Advertisement

What Is at Stake for Metropolitan Regions and Their Governance Institutions?

  • Karsten ZimmermannEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter asks what drives contemporary institutional change in metropolitan regions. On the one hand, the rise of metropolitan regions as competitive territories par excellence is generating increasing interest in the question of how best to plan and govern the modern metropolis. Indeed, widespread metropolitan institutional reforms are held up by many urbanists as evidence that metropolitan regions matter and that they increasingly have the institutional capacity to set free from the regulatory control of the nation-state. On the other hand, many are currently questioning the capacity that these institutions really must (re)act. From arguments that the state is actually devolving austerity rather than empowering metropolitan regions, to the imposition of metropolitan reforms and certain types of institutional models (e.g. the growing prominence of deal-making, the mayoral model), there is a growing body of work contending that the perceived institutional power of metropolitan regions vis-à-vis a declining role for state-level institutions is a matter of myth rather than reality. With this as a point of departure, this chapter addresses a series of key questions holding both intellectual and practical implications: What are the current issues faced by metro regions? What is currently being proposed—and critically by whom—for the next stage(s) of metropolitan reform? Where does metropolitan governance reform sit within current developments and debates around governance per se? What are the implications of current initiatives? In the final section, these questions are used to outline the likely future direction(s) through which metropolitan governance will/should develop and what the implications of recent changes might be.

Keywords

Regionalisation Decentralisation Metropolitan governance Polarisation Citizenship 

References

  1. Addie, J.-P., & Keil, R. (2015). Real existing regionalism: The region between talk, territory and technology. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(2), 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barron, G. F., & Frug, G. E. (2005). Defensive localism: A view of the field from the field. Journal of Law and Politics, 21(2–3), 261–291.Google Scholar
  3. Blotevogel, H. H., & Schmitt, P. (2006). ‘European Metropolitan Regions’ as a new discursive frame in strategic spatial planning and policies in German. Erde, 137(1–2), 55–74.Google Scholar
  4. Bolgherini, S., Lippi, A., & Maset, S. (2016). In mezzo al guado La governance subregionale tra «vecchie» province e «nuove» aree vaste [In the midst of subregional governance between ‘old’ provinces and ‘new’ vast areas]. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 3, 341–372.Google Scholar
  5. Bontje, M. (2004). From suburbia to post-suburbia in the Netherlands: Potentials and threats for sustainable urban development. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19(1), 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christmann, A. (2014). Von government zu governance? Acht europäische metropolregionen im vergleich [From government to governance? Eight European metropolitan regions in comparison]. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 8(1), 141–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crouch, C., & Le Galès, P. (2012). Cities as national champions. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(3), 405–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Demazière, C. (2020). The multiple agencies of metropolitan institutions: Is there convergence? In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 41–57). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Dembski, S., Schulze Bäing, A., & Sykes, O. (2017). What about the urban periphery? The effects of the urban renaissance in the Mersey belt. Comparative Population Studies, 42(2), 219–244.Google Scholar
  10. Eurocities. (2013). Metropolitan areas in action—concluding report. Brussels: Eurocities.Google Scholar
  11. Fedeli, V. (2017). Metropolitan governance and metropolitan cities in Italy: Outdated solutions for processes of urban regionalisation? Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 75(3), 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harding, A. (2007). Taking city regions seriously? Response to debate on ‘city-regions’: New geographies of governance, democracy and social reproduction. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(2), 443–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heinelt, H., & Kübler, D. (Eds.). (2005). Metropolitan governance: Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Heinelt, H., Razin, E., & Zimmermann, K. (2011). Metropolitan governance: Different paths in contrasting contexts: Germany and Israel. Frankfurt am Main: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Herrschel, T., & Dierwechter, Y. (2018). Smart transitions in city regionalism. Territory, politics and the quest for competitiveness and sustainability. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hochstenbach, C., & Musterd, S. (2018). Gentrification and the suburbanization of poverty: Changing urban geographies through boom and bust periods. Urban Geography, 39(1), 26–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2009). Urban ecological security: A new urban paradigm? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(1), 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jonas, A. E. G. (2012). City-regionalism: Questions of distributions and politics. Progress in Human Geography, 36(6), 822–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kantor, P., Lefèvre, C., Saito, A., Savitch, H. V., & Thornley, A. (2012). Struggling giants: City region governance in London, New York, Paris, and Tokyo. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  20. Keil, R., & Hamel, P. (Eds.). (2015). Suburban governance—A global view. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  21. Keil, R., Hamel, P., Boudreau, J.-A., & Kipfer, S. (Eds.). (2017). Governing cities through regions: Canadian and European perspectives. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Klink, J. (2014). The hollowing out of Brazilian metropolitan governance as we know it: Restructuring and rescaling the developmental state in metropolitan space. Antipode, 46(3), 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kneebone, E., & Garr, E. (2010). The suburbanization of poverty: Trends in metropolitan America, 2000 to 2008. Brookings metropolitan opportunity series. Washington DC: Brooking Institute.Google Scholar
  24. Kübler, D. (2012). Governing the metropolis: Towards kinder, gentler democracies. European Political Science, 11(3), 430–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kübler, D., & Heinelt, H. (2005). Metropolitan governance, democracy and the dynamics of place. In H. Heinelt, & D. Kübler (Eds.), Metropolitan governance: Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place (pp. 8–28). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Kübler, D., & Lefèvre, C. (2017). Megacity governance and the state. Urban Research & Practice, 11(4), 378–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuhlmann, S., & Bouckaert, G. (Eds.). (2016). Local public sector reforms in times of crisis: National trajectories and international comparison. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Kuhlmann, S., & Wayenberg, E. (2016). Institutional impact assessment in multi-level-systems: Conceptualizing decentralization effects from a comparative perspective. International Review of Administrative Science, 82(2), 233–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Le Galès, P. (2016). Neoliberalism and urban change: Stretching a good idea too far? Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(2), 154–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Le Galès, P., & Borraz, O. (2005). France: The intermunicipal revolution. In L. Rose, & B. Denters (Eds.), Local government in Europe (pp. 12–28). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Le Galès, P., & Vitale, T. (2013). Governing the large metropolis: A research agenda. Working Papers du Programme ‘Cities are back in town’, 2013-8. Paris: Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  32. Lidström, A. (2013). Citizens in the city-regions: Political orientations across municipal borders. Urban Affairs Review, 49(2), 282–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lidström, A., & Schaap, L. (2018). The citizen in city-regions: Patterns and variations. Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Loughlin, J. (2007). Reconfiguring the state: Trends in territorial governance in European states. Regional and Federal Studies, 17(4), 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. METROPOLIS. (2017). Action plan 2018–2020. Barcelona: Metropolis.Google Scholar
  36. METREX. (2014). The complete works. 2010 onwards. Glasgow: Metrex.Google Scholar
  37. Phelps, N., & Wood, A. (2011). The new post-suburban politics? Urban Studies, 48(12), 2591–2610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Phelps, N., Wood, A., & Valler, D. (2010). A postsuburban world? An outline of a research agenda. Environment and Planning A, 42(2), 366–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pucher, J., & Lefèvre, C. (1998). The urban transport crisis in Europe and North America. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. Raudla, R., & Tavares, A. F. (2018). Inter-municipal cooperation and austerity policies: Obstacles or opportunities? In F. Teles, & P. Swianiewicz (Eds.), Inter-municipal cooperation in Europe: Institutions and governance (pp. 17–41). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Robinson, J., & Roy, A. (2015). Global urbanisms and the nature of urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(1), 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rousseau, M. (2015). Many rivers to cross. Suburban densification and the social status quo in Greater Lyon. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(3), 622–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sager, F. (2006). Policy coordination in the European metropolis: A meta-analysis. West European Politics, 29(3), 433–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Salet, W., & Thornley, A. (2007). Institutional influences on the integration of multilevel governance and spatial policy in European city-regions. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27(2), 188–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Savini, F. (2014). What happens to the urban periphery? The political tensions of postindustrial redevelopment in Milan. Urban Affairs Review, 50(2), 180–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Savini, F., Majoor, S., & Salet, W. (2015). Urban peripheries: Reflecting on politics and projects in Amsterdam, Milan, and Paris. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(3), 457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scott, A. J. (2019). City-regions reconsidered. Environment and Planning A, 51, 554–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sellers, J. M. (2017). Metropolitan inequality and governance: A framework for global comparison. In J. M. Sellers, D. Kübler, M. Arretche, & E. Razin (Eds.), Inequality and governance in the metropolis: Place equality regimes and fiscal choices in eleven countries (pp. 1–23). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. Sellers, J. M., & Hoffmann-Martinot, V. (2009). Metropolitan governance. In: UCLG (Ed.), World report on decentralization and local democracy (pp. 255–279). Barcelona: UCLG.Google Scholar
  50. Sellers, J. M., & Walks, A. (2013). Introduction—the metropolitanisation of politics. In J. M. Sellers, D. Kübler, R. A. Walks, & M. Walter-Rogg, (Eds.), The political ecology of the metropolis (pp. 4–35). Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  51. Sellers, J. M., Kübler, D., Walks, R. A., & Walter-Rogg, M. (2013). The political ecology of the metropolis. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  52. Sellers, J. M., Kübler, D., Arretche, M., & Razin, E. (2017). Inequality and governance in the metropolis: Place equality regimes and fiscal choices in eleven countries. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sharpe, J. J. (Ed.). (1995). The government of world cities: The future of the metro model. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  54. Shaw, K., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2017). ‘Disorganised devolution’: Reshaping metropolitan governance in England in a period of austerity. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 75(3), 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Strebel, M. A. (2018). Who supports metropolitan reform? Citizens’ attitudes in four west European countries. Paper Prepared for Presentation at the EURA Annual Conference, Tilburg, 21–23 June.Google Scholar
  56. Streeck, W. (2017). A new regime: The consolidation state. In D. King, & P. Le Galès (Eds.), Reconfiguring European states in crisis (pp. 139–157). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tomàs, M. (2020). Metropolitan revolution or metropolitan evolution? The (dis)continuities in metropolitan institutional reforms. In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 25–39). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  58. Walks, A. R. (2006). The causes of city-suburban political polarization? A Canadian case study. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(2), 390–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ward, K., & Jonas, A. E. G. (2004). Competitive city regionalism as a politics of space: A critical reinterpretation of the ‘new regionalism’. Environment and Planning A, 36(12), 2119–2139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Watson, V. (2016). Shifting approaches to planning theory: Global North and South. Urban Planning, 1(4), 32–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zimmermann, K. (2014). Democratic metropolitan governance: Experiences in five German metropolitan regions. Urban Research and Practice, 7(2), 182–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zimmermann, K. (2017). Re-scaling of metropolitan governance in Germany. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 75(3), 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zimmermann, K. (2018). Politicising the regional scale? The politics of metropolitan governance in Germany, Canada and Brazil. In A. Eraydin, & K. Frey (Eds.), Politics and conflict in governance and planning: Theory and practice (pp. 151–168). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Zimmermann, K., & Feiertag, P. (2019). Return of the metro-model: Governance and planning in metropolitan regions under change. An international comparison of France, Italy and Germany (pp. 16–26). IRMB Papers no. 61, Special Issue Metropolitan Governance. Barcelona: Barcelona Institute of Regional and Metropolitan Studies.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dortmund Technical UniversityDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations