Advertisement

Metropolitan Revolution or Metropolitan Evolution? The (Dis)continuities in Metropolitan Institutional Reforms

  • Mariona TomàsEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The development and change of metropolitan institutions have been at the heart of political and theoretical debates for decades. However, given the widespread path dependency of institutional development, we may ask what has really changed over time? The aim of this chapter is to evaluate recent institutional developments that have come to be seen as emblematic of a ‘metropolitan revolution’ in governance. Based on the description of current and the past developments, the chapter will question the nomenclature of institutional ideas on metropolitan governance that is also often used to distinguish different periods if not paradigms of metropolitan governance. Our focus—though not exclusively—will be on developments in Europe where we will analyse recent reforms to reveal how allegedly broad, universal trends and phases of metropolitan institutional reform are, in fact, occurring at different paces, in different ways, at different times, and with different degrees of institutionalisation across space. The chapter concludes with the assertion that current processes of change pertaining to metropolitan institutions are actually part of an evolution rather than of a revolution.

Keywords

Metropolitan governance Institutional reforms Institutional change Europe 

References

  1. Baraize, F., & Négrier, E. (2001). L’Invention Politique de l’Agglomération [The political invention of the agglomeration]. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  2. Beauregard, R. (2006). Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Urban Affairs Review, 41(3), 416–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brenner, N. (1999). Globalisation as reterritorialisation: The re-scaling of urban governance in the European Union. Urban Studies, 36(3), 431–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brenner, N. (2002). Decoding the newest ‘metropolitan regionalism’ in the USA: A critical overview. Cities, 19(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brenner, N. (2004). Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in Western Europe, 1960–2000. Review of International Political Economy, 11(3), 447–488.Google Scholar
  6. Collin, J.-P., Léveillée, J., & Poitras, C. (2002). New challenges but old solutions: Metropolitan reorganization in Canadian and U.S. city-regions—A comparative perspective. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(2), 317–332.Google Scholar
  7. Copus, C. (2004). Directly elected mayors: A tonic for local governance or old wine in new bottles? Local Government Studies, 30(4), 576–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crivello, S., & Staricco, L. (2017). Institutionalising metropolitan cities in Italy: Success and limits of a centralistic, simplifying approach. Urban Research & Practice, 10(2), 228–238.Google Scholar
  9. Demazière, C. (2018). Le sacre des métropoles? L’institution d’un nouveau palier de gouvernement local dans trois pays Européens [The coronation of the metropolis? The establishment of a new level of local government in three European countries]. Bulletin de la Société de Géographie de Liège, 71(2), 37–56.Google Scholar
  10. Demazière, C. (2020). The multiple agencies of metropolitan institutions: Is there convergence? In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 41–58). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Dlabac, O., Medir, L, Tomàs, M. & Lackowska, M. (2018). Metropolitan challenges and reform pressures across Europe—The perspectives of city mayors. Local Government Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1411811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fedeli, V. (2017). Metropolitan governance and metropolitan cities in Italy: Outdated solutions for processes of urban regionalisation? Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 75(3), 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galland, D. (2012). Is regional planning dead or just coping? The transformation of a state sociospatial project into growth-oriented strategies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(3), 536–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galland, D., & Harrison, J. (2020). Conceptualising metropolitan regions: How institutions, policies, spatial imaginaries and planning are influencing metropolitan development. In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 1–23). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Hackworth, J. (2007). The neoliberal city: Governance, ideology, and development in American urbanism. Cornell: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  17. Heinelt, H., & Kübler, D. (Eds.). (2005). Metropolitan governance: Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Heinelt, H., & Zimmermann, K. (2011). How can we explain diversity in metropolitan governance within a country? Some reflections on recent developments in Germany. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(6), 1175–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krukowska, M., & Lackowska, M. (2017). Metropolitan colours of Europeanization: Institutionalisation of integrated territorial investment structures in the context of past cooperation in metropolitan regions. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 75(3), 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lackowska, M., & Mikuła, L. (2018). How metropolitan can you go? Citizenship in Polish city-regions. Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(1), 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Le Galès, P. (2006). New state space in Western Europe? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(3), 717–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lefèvre, C. (1998). Metropolitan government and governance in western countries: A critical review. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22(1), 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lidström, A., & Schaap, L. (Eds.). (2018). The citizens in city-regions. Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  24. Lowndes, V. (2005). Something old, something new, something borrowed: How institutions change (and stay the same) in local governance. Policy Studies, 26(3/4), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Magre, J., & Bertrana, X. (2007). Exploring the limits of institutional change: The direct election of mayors in Western Europe. Local Government Studies, 33(2), 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martí-Costa, M., & Tomàs, M. (2017). Urban governance in Spain: From democratic transition to austerity policies. Urban Studies 54(9), 2107–2122.Google Scholar
  27. Medir, L., Magre, J., & Tomàs, M. (2018). Mayors’ perceptions on local government reforms and decentralisation in Spain. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 46(1), 129–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moisio, S., & Luukkonen, J. (2015). European spatial planning as governmentality: An inquiry into rationalities, techniques, and manifestations. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 33(4), 828–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Norris, D. F. (2001). Prospects for regional governance under the new regionalism: Economic imperatives versus political impediments. Journal of Urban Affairs, 21(5), 557–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. North, D. (1995). The new institutional economics and third world development. In J. Harriss, J. Hunter, & C. Lewis (Eds.), The new institutional economics and third world development (pp. 17–26). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. OECD. (2015). Governing the city. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pelkonen, A. (2008). The Finnish competition state and entrepreneurial policies in the Helsinki region. Research Reports, 254, Department of Sociology, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
  33. Pyka, R. (2011). La métropolisation en Pologne: Le fonctionnement et l’avenir des espaces métropolitains polonaise [Metropolisation in Poland: The functioning and future of Polish metropolitan areas]. Métropoles, 10. http://metropoles.revues.org/4515.
  34. Region Hannover. (2014). Wahlen 2014 in der region Hannover. Hannover.Google Scholar
  35. Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Salet, W. (2018). Public norms and aspirations: The turn to institutions in action. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sandford, M. (2017). Directly-elected mayors. House of Commons Library Briefing Paper, 5000.Google Scholar
  38. Sharpe, L. J. (1995). The government of world cities: The future of the metro model. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Savitch, H., & Vogel, R. (2009). Regionalism and urban politics. In J. Davies, & D. Imbroscio (Eds.), Theories of urban politics (pp. 106–124). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shaw, K., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2017). ‘Disorganised devolution’: Reshaping metropolitan governance in England in a period of austerity. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 75(3), 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Slack, E. (2018). Financing metropolitan public policies and services. Issue Paper 6, Metropolis Observatory.Google Scholar
  42. Swanstrom, T. (2001). What we argue about when we argue about regionalism. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23(5), 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sweeting, D. (Ed.). (2017). Directly elected mayors in urban governance. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  44. Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tomàs, M. (2012). Exploring the metropolitan trap: The case of Montreal. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(3), 554–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tomàs, M. (2016). Metropolitan trends in the world. Issue Paper 1, Metropolis Observatory.Google Scholar
  47. Tomàs, M. (2017). Explaining metropolitan governance: The case of Spain. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 75(3), 243–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tomàs, M. (2018). Els governs metropolitans d’elecció directa. Reflexions per a l’Àrea Metropolitana de Barcelona [The metropolitan governments of direct election. Reflections for the metropolitan area of Barcelona]. Revista Papers, 61(1), 52–59.Google Scholar
  49. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2018). World urbanization prospects 2018. https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/. Accessed January 29, 2019.
  50. Wright, F. (Ed.). (1928). A symposium of opinion on the borough system of government for Greater Montreal. Montréal: Municipal Service Bureau.Google Scholar
  51. Zimmermann, K. (2017). Re-scaling of metropolitan governance in Germany. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 75(3), 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zimmermann, K., & Feiertag, P. (2018). Return of the metro-model? Governance and planning in metropolitan regions under change—An international comparison of France, Italy and Germany. Revista Papers, 61(1), 16–26.Google Scholar
  53. Zimmermann, K., & Getimis, P. (2017). Rescaling of metropolitan governance and spatial planning in Europe: An introduction to the special issue. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 75(3), 203–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zimmermann, K. (2020). What is at stake for metropolitan regions and their governance institutions? In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 59–74). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations