Advertisement

Data Ownership in the Data Economy: A European Dilemma

  • Francesco Banterle
Chapter

Abstract

To unleash the potential of new data-driven opportunities, players in the data market need to have access to large and diverse datasets. Access in relation to data is therefore a crucial factor. However, the new data economy raises unsolved issues. Where a multitude of actors interact in the elaboration of data, it is often questioned: who owns the data? As part of its Digital Single Market strategy, the European Commission has started a series of initiatives aimed at addressing the data ownership issue. They culminated with the idea of introducing a novel right in raw machine-generated data.

This chapter briefly summarizes the European Commission’s strategy. It recalls the main characteristics of the data value chain. It then elaborates on the existing EU acquis on data ownership, deriving from intellectual property rights (namely copyright and database right), trade secrets, traditional property, and factual control situations derived by data protection laws. These ownership mechanisms are powerful although difficulty extend to raw data. Despite this, gaps in law have been filled through contractual schemes and technological access restrictions that enhance the ability to control data.

The chapter further explores the position of those that support the idea of a new property right in data and elaborates on the new right proposed by the European Commission. This paper concludes that creating new monopolies capable of restricting open access to data, may result in a threat to development of an EU data market. Further, economic evidence is needed before discussing the introduction of such a new right. Indeed, we should learn from past lessons, as it happened with the Database Directive: new rights are here to stay. Other suggested approaches seem more able to fit the needs of the data-economy. In particular, sector-based access against remuneration can be an option to investigate. However, also in this case, this must come together with economic evidence and in dept analysis of possible market failures.

References

  1. Banterle F (2018) The interface between data protection and IP law: the case of trade secrets and the database sui generis right in marketing operations, and the ownership of raw data in big data analysis. In: Bakhoum et al (eds) Personal data in competition, consumer protection and intellectual property law. MPI Stud. Intellec. Property, vol 28. Springer, pp 411–443Google Scholar
  2. Banterle F, Ghidini G (2018) A critical view on the European Commission’s Proposal for a Directive on copyright in the Digital Single Market. Giur Comm 6:921–957Google Scholar
  3. Bird & Bird (2017) White Paper - data ownership in the context of the European data economy: proposal for a new right. https://sites-twobirds.vuture.net/1/773/landing-pages/white-paper-form.asp
  4. De Franceschi A, Lehmann M (2015) Data as tradable commodity and new measures for their protection. Ital Law J:51–72Google Scholar
  5. Drexl J (2016) Designing competitive markets for industrial data – between propertisation and access. Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Research, Paper No. 16-13Google Scholar
  6. Drexl J, Hilty R et al (2016) Position statement of the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition on the current debate on exclusive rights and access rights to data at the European level. GRUR Int 65(10):914–918Google Scholar
  7. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (Duch-Brown N, Martins B, Mueller-Langer F) (2017) The economics of ownership, access and trade in digital data. JRC Digital Economy Working Paper 2017-01Google Scholar
  8. Ginsburg JC (2018) People not machines: authorship and what it means in the Berne Convention. IIC 49:131–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoeren T (2014) Big data and the ownership in data: recent developments in Europe. EIPR 36(12):751–754Google Scholar
  10. Hugenholtz P (2018) Against ‘Data Property’. In: Ullrich H, Drahos P, Ghidini G (eds) Kritika: essays on intellectual property, vol 3. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 48–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kerber W (2016) A new (intellectual) property right for non-personal data? An economic analysis. GRUR Int 989Google Scholar
  12. Malgieri G (2016) Property and (intellectual) ownership of consumers’ information: a new taxonomy for personal data. PinG 4:133Google Scholar
  13. Mattioli M (2014) Disclosing big data. Minn Law Rev:535–583Google Scholar
  14. Metzger A, Efroni Z, Mischau L, Metzger J (2018) Data-related aspects of the digital content directive. JIPITEC. https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-9-1-2018/4682
  15. OECD (2015) Data-driven innovation: big data for growth and well-being. OECD PublishingGoogle Scholar
  16. Osborne Clarke (2016) Legal study on ownership and access to data. European Union BookshopGoogle Scholar
  17. Ottolia A (2017) Big data e innovazione computazionale. Giappichelli, TurinGoogle Scholar
  18. Perry M, Margoni T (2010) From music tracks to Google maps: who owns computer-generated works? Comput Law Secur Rev 26:621–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Purtova N (2015) The illusion of personal data as no one’s property. Law Innov Technol 7(1):83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ramalho A (2017) Will robots rule the (artistic) world? A proposed model for the legal status of creations by artificial intelligence systems. J Internet Law 21(1):12–25Google Scholar
  21. Rees C (2014) Who owns our data? Comput Law Secur Rev 30(1):75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Resta G (2011) Nuovi beni immateriali e numerus clausus dei diritti esclusivi. In: Resta (ed) Diritti esclusivi e nuovi beni immateriali. UtetGoogle Scholar
  23. Sholtz P (2001) Transaction costs and the social costs of online privacy. First Monday 6(5). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/issue/view/133
  24. Specht L, Zerbst J (2018) Considering the relationship between the civil law treatment of data and data protection law in Germany. JIPLP 13(6):504–512Google Scholar
  25. Surblyte G (2016) Data as a digital resource. Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Research Paper No. 16-22Google Scholar
  26. Ubertazzi LC (2014) Proprietà intellettuale e privacy. Foro it.: 3-16Google Scholar
  27. Van Erp S (2009) From ‘classical’ to modern European property law? In: Sakkoulas, Bruylant (eds) Essays in honour of Konstantinos D. Kerameus, pp 1517–1533 (also available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1372166)
  28. Van Erp S (2017) Ownership of digital assets and the numerus clausus of legal objects. Maastricht European Private Law Institute Working Paper No. 2017/6. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3046402
  29. Victor JM (2013) The EU general data protection regulation: toward a property regime for protecting data privacy. Yale Law J 123(2):266Google Scholar
  30. Wiebe A (2016) Protection of industrial data: a new property right for the digital economy? JIPLP 12(1):62–77Google Scholar
  31. Zech H (2015) Information as property. JIPITEC 6:192Google Scholar
  32. Zech H (2016a) Data as a tradable commodity. In: De Franceschi (ed) European contract law and the Digital Single Market. Intersentia, pp 51–79Google Scholar
  33. Zech H (2016b) A legal framework for a data economy in the European Digital Single Market: rights to use data. J Intellect Prop Law Pract 11:460–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zech H (2017) Data as a tradeable commodity – implications for contract law. In: Drexl (ed) Proceedings of the 18th EIPIN congress: the new data economy between data ownership, privacy and safeguarding competition. Edward Elgar Publishing, forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3063153
  35. Zeno-Zencovich V (1989) Cosa. In: Digesto delle discipline privatistiche. Utet, vol IV, p 438Google Scholar
  36. Zeno-Zencovich V (2018) Dati, grandi dati, dati granulari e la nuova epistemologia del giurista. Medialaws, 2Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco Banterle
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Milan and Hogan Lovells Studio LegaleMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations