Advertisement

Generosity, Peer-Support, and Positive Development in Youth

  • Christoph SteinebachEmail author
  • Marcel Schaer
  • Imke Knafla
Chapter

Abstract

In adolescence, many physical, emotional, and cognitive changes bring along their own problems and risks. But they also offer the chance to develop new skills, including those connected with mindfulness, compassion, or generosity. Social relationships can support positive developments. Even in adolescence, family remains important, contributing to the satisfaction of basic needs. Peers can also support positive development and become particularly important in adolescence. With them, young people’s radius widens into a more comprehensive and differentiated social and physical environment. The newly acquired competences also promote the acceptance of responsibility. The social and physical environments become relevant learning fields for the integration of identity, values, and norms. Generosity as part of one’s own identity becomes a touchstone for positive development. In this paper, we discuss several forms and conditions of prosocial behavior as well as of generosity. We assign different internal conditions to “prosocial personality”, ranging from genetic or biological factors to self-efficacy. External factors for prosocial behavior and generosity are described. In everyday life, young people must feel needed and require places to show their new autonomous generosity skills. Being generous not only helps others: it also satisfies one’s own basic needs and thus contributes to positive development and well-being.

Keywords

Developmental tasks Structures of peer relations Environmental systems Definition of generosity Citizenship 

References

  1. Albanesi, C., Cicognani, E., & Zani, B. (2007). Sense of community, civic engagement and social well-being in Italian adolescents. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17(5), 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderman, E. M. (2012). Adolescence. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Vol. 3. Application to learning and teaching (pp. 43–61). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  3. Blakemore, S.-J., & Mills, K. L. (2014). Is Adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing? Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1999). Environments in developmental perspective: Theoretical and operational models. In S. L. Friedman & T. D. Wachs (Eds.), Measuring environment across the life span (pp. 3–28). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, B. B., & Braun, M. T. (2013). Peer relations. In C. Proctor & P. A. Linley (Eds.), Research, applications, and interventions for children and adolescents: A positive psychology perspective (pp. 149–164). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Camara, M., Bacigalupe, G., & Padilla, P. (2014). The role of social support in adolescents: Are you helping me or stressing me out? International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 1–14.Google Scholar
  8. Campos, B., Schoebi, D., Gonzaga, G. C., Gable, S. L., & Keltner, D. (2015). Attuned to the positive? Awareness and responsiveness to others’ positive emotion experience and display. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 780–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S., & Randall, B. A. (2003). Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 23, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collett, J. L., & Morrissey, C. A. (2007). The social psychology of generosity: The state of current interdisciplinary research. USA: University of Notre Dame. https://generosityresearch.nd.edu/assets/17634/social_psychology_of_generosity_final.pdf. Accessed January 12, 2019.
  12. Damon, W. (2008). The path to purpose: How young people find their calling in life. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dijkstra, J. K., & Veenstra, R. (2011). Peer relations. In B. B. Brown & M. Prinstein (Eds.), Encyclopedia of adolescence (Vol. 2, pp. 255–259). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donlan, A. E., Lynch, A. D., & Lerner, R. M. (2015). Peer relationships and positive youth development. In E. P. Bowers, G. J. Geldhof, S. K. Johnson, L. J. Hilliard, R. M. Hershberg, J. V. Lerner, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Promoting positive youth development. Advancing responsible adolescent development (pp. 121–136). New York: Springer International.Google Scholar
  15. Dreher, E., & Dreher, M. (2008). Kognitive Entwicklung im Jugendalter. In R. K. Silbereisen & M. Hasselhorn (Eds.), Entwicklungspsychologie des Jugendalters. Enzyklopädie für Psychologie, Themenbereich C: Theorie und Forschung, Serie V: Entwicklungspsychologie (pp. 55–107). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  16. Gantman, A. P., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2014). Mindful Mindlessness in Goal Pursuit. In A. Ie, C. T. Ngnoumen, & E. J. Langer (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of mindfulness (pp. 237–257). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Giedd, J. N. (2015). The “teen brain” is often ridiculed as an oxymoron—An example of biology gone wrong. Scientific American, 312, 32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Giedd, J. N., Raznahan, A., Alexander-Bloch, A., Schmitt, E., Gogtay, N., & Rapoport, J. L. (2015). Child psychiatry branch of the National Institute of Mental Health longitudinal structural magnetic resonance imaging study of human brain development. Neuropsychopharmacology, 40, 43–49.Google Scholar
  19. Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental psychology matters. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 541–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greater Goods Science Center. (o.J.). The science of generosity. White paper prepared for the John Templeton Foundation by the Greater Good Science Center at UC Berkeley. https://www.templeton.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Generosity_White_Paper-FinalJTF.pdf. Accessed January 12, 2019.
  21. Grönlund, H., Nortomaa, A., Aramburuzabala, P., McIlrath, L., Opazo, H., Altenburger, R., et al. (2017). Guidelines for institutionalization of service-learning. https://europeengagedotorg.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/guidelines-euengage-2.pdf. Accessed January 12, 2018.
  22. Gunzenhauser, C., Heikamp, T., Gerbino, M., Alessandri, G., von Suchodoletz, A., Di Giunta, L., et al. (2013). Self-efficacy in regulating positive and negative emotions. A validation study in Germany. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29(3), 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Güroğlu, B., Woutervanden, B., & Crone, E. A. (2014). Sharing and giving across adolescence: An experimental study examining the development of prosocial behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(291), 1–13.Google Scholar
  24. Hahn, K. (1959). Dr. Kurt Hahn at the forty-eighth annual dinner of Old Centralians. http://www.kurthahn.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/2017-oldcentral.pdf. Accessed January 12, 2019.
  25. Haidt, J. (2003). Elevation and the positive psychology of morality. In C. L. M. Keyes & J. E. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 275–289). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  26. Hurrelmann, K. (2012). Das Modell der produktiven Realitätsverarbeitung. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 33, 127–138.Google Scholar
  27. Komter, A. (2010). The evolutionary origins of human generosity. International Sociology, 25(3), 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Knafla, I., Schaer, M., & Steinebach, C. (2016). Jugendliche stärken. Wirkfaktoren in Beratung und Therapie. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  29. Kroger, J. (2015). Identity in childhood and adolescence. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 11, pp. 537–542). Bellingham, WA: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller, C. B. (2018). Generosity. A preliminary account of a surprisingly neglected virtue. Metaphilosophy, 49(3), 216–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Newman, B. M., & Newman, P. R. (2011). Theories of adolescence. In R. J. R. Levesque (Ed.), Encyclopedia of adolescence (Vol. 1, pp. 20–29). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oarga, C., Stavrova, O., & Fetchenhauer, D. (2015). When and why is helping others good for well-being? The role of belief in reciprocity and conformity to society’s expectations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oishi, S. (2014). Socioecological psychology. Annual Review Psychology, 65, 581–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Padilla-Walker, L. M., Dyer, W. J., Yorgason, J. B., Fraser, A. M., & Coyne, S. M. (2013). Adolescents’ prosocial behavior toward family, friends, and strangers: A person-centered approach. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(1), 135–150.Google Scholar
  35. Piaget, J. (1973). Einführung in die genetische Erkenntnistheorie. Frankfurt. M.: Fischer.Google Scholar
  36. Przepiorka, W., & Liebe, U. (2016). Generosity is a sign of trustworthiness—The punishment of selfishness is not. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Raffel, S. (2001). On generosity. History of the Human Sciences, 14(4), 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sahdra, B. K., Ciarrochi, J., Parker, P. D., Marshalland, S., & Heaven, P. (2015). Empathy and non attachment independently predict peer nominations of prosocial behavior of adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(263), 1–12.Google Scholar
  39. Sales, J. M., & Irwin, C. E. (2013). A biopsychosocial perspective of adolescent health and disease. In W. T. O’Donohue, L. T. Benuto, & L. Woodward Tolle (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent health psychology (pp. 13–29). New-York: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Schaer, M., & Studer, A. (2013). Familie. Gelungene Balance zwischen Nähe und Distanz. In C. Steinebach & K. Gharabaghi (Eds.), Resilienzförderung im Jugendalter. Praxis und Perspektiven (pp. 69–81). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  41. Silbereisen, R. K., & Weichold, K. (2012). Jugend (12–19 Jahre). In W. Schneider & U. Lindenberger (Eds.), Entwicklungspsychologie (7th ed., pp. 235–258). Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  42. Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Steinebach, C. (2015). Resilience. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 20, pp. 555–560). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Steinebach, C., & Gharabaghi, K. (2018). Resilienz. In B. Gniewosz & P. F. Titzmann (Eds.), Handbuch Jugend (pp. 508–525). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  45. Steinebach, C., Schrenk, A., Steinebach, U., & Brendtro, L. K. (2018). Positive Peer Culture. Ein Manual für starke Gruppengespräche. Weinheim: Beltz-Juventa.Google Scholar
  46. Steinebach, C., & Steinebach, U. (2013). Gleichaltrige. Peers als Ressource. In C. Steinebach & K. Gharabahi (Eds.), Resilienzförderung im Jugendalter. Praxis und Perspektiven (pp. 93–109). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  47. Trommsdorff, G. (2015). Cultural roots of values, morals, and religious orientations in adolescent development. In L. A. Jensen (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human development and culture: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 377–395). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Uhls, G. E., Greenfield, P., Subrahmanyam, K., & Šmahel, D. (2011). Internet and other interactive media. In R. J. R. Levesque (Ed.), Encyclopedia of adolescence (Vol. 2, pp. 160–168). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ungar, M., Ghazinour, M., & Richter, J. (2013). Annual research review: What is resilience within the social ecology of human development? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(4), 348–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsmana, G., & de Hollander, A. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being. Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; A literature study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vohs, K. D., Redden, J. P., & Rahinel, R. (2013). Physical order produces healthy choices, generosity, and conventionality, whereas disorder produces creativity. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1860–1867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Warneken, F. (2016). Insights into the biological foundation of human altruistic sentiments. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weinstein, N., Przybylski, A. K., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Can nature make us more caring? Effects of immersion in nature on intrinsic aspirations and generosity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(10), 1315–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Worthman, C. M. (2011). Hormones and behavior. In B. B. Brown & M. J. Prinstein (Eds.), Encyclopedia of adolescence. Normative processes and development (Vol. 1, pp. 177–186). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  55. Zhang, J. W., Piff, P. K., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Keltner, D. (2014). An occasion for unselfing: Beautiful nature leads to prosociality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christoph Steinebach
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marcel Schaer
    • 1
  • Imke Knafla
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Applied Psychology, ZHAW Zürich University of Applied SciencesZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations