• Billur Aslan Ozgul
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Young People and Politics book series (PSYPP)


This chapter begins by introducing the research and discusses how the organisation and mobilisation of social movements have changed and continue to do so in the digital age. It reviews the works of social movement and communications scholars who analysed the recent Occupy Protests and Arab Uprisings and urge a shift in the discussion about the opportunities that ICTs present to certain movements to the real capabilities of the technology. The chapter contains detailed descriptions of the methodology conducted for this study and the main arguments of the book, which are centred around the three themes of repertoires, leadership and resources. I also give details of the outline of the book.


  1. Abaza, J., & Youssef, A. (2011, January 28). 28 January 2011: Egypt’s Bastille Day. Retrieved from
  2. Alaoui, H. (2016, April 12). Is the Arab world better off, five years after the Arab Spring? [Web log post]. Retrieved from
  3. Alvarez-Ossorio, I. (2012). Syria’s struggling civil society. Middle East Quarterly, 19(2), 23–32.Google Scholar
  4. Anckar, C. (2008). On the applicability of the most similar systems design and the most different systems design in comparative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(5), 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aouragh, M., & Alexander, A. (2011). The Arab Spring: The Egyptian experience: Sense and nonsense of the Internet revolution. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1344–1358.Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bimber, B., Flanagin, A., & Stohl, C. (2005, November). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory, 15(4). Scholar
  8. Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cole, J. (2014). The new Arabs: How the millennial generation is changing the Middle East. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  12. Edwards, B., & McCarthy, J. (2004). Resources and social movement mobilization. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 116–153). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Eltantawy, N., & Wiest, J. (2011). Social media in the Egyptian revolution: Reconsidering resource mobilization theory. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1207–1224.Google Scholar
  14. Faris, D. (2013). Dissent and revolution in the digital age. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. New York, NY: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gerbaudo, P. (2014). The persistence of collectivity in digital protest. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 264–268. Scholar
  17. Gladwell, M. (2010, October 4). Small change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted. The New Yorker. Retrieved from
  18. Goldstone, A. J. (2011). Understanding the revolutions of 2011. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from
  19. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heaven, W. (2009, July 8). Iran’s crackdown proves that the ‘Twitter revolution’ has made things worse [Web log post]. Retrieved from
  21. Herrera, L. (2014). Revolution in the age of social media. London, UK: Verso.Google Scholar
  22. Howard, P., & Hussain, M. (2013). Democracy’s fourth wave? Digital media and the Arab Spring. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Howard, P., & Parks, M. (2012). Social media and political change: Capacity, constraint, and consequence. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 359–362. Scholar
  24. Jenkins, J. C. (1983). Resource mobilisation theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 527–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leverett, F. (2005). Inheriting Syria: Bashar’s trial by fire. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lijphart, A. (1975). The comparable cases strategy in comparative research. Comparative Political Studies, 8(2), 158–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lim, M. (2012). Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004–2011. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 231–248. Scholar
  28. McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morozov, E. (2012). The net delusion: How not to liberate the world. London, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
  30. Papacharissi, Z., & Oliveira, M. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling in Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 266–282. Scholar
  31. Phillips, C. (2015). Sectarianism and conflict in Syria. Third World Quarterly, 36(2): 357–376. Scholar
  32. Poell, T., Abdulla, R., Rider, B., Woltering, R., & Liesbeth, Z. (2015). Protest leadership in the age of social media. Information, Communication and Society, 19(7), 994–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rihoux, B. (2006). Qualitative comparative analysis and related systematic comparative methods. International Sociology, 21(5), 679–706. Scholar
  34. Rosen, J. (2011, February 13). The Twitter can’t topple dictators. Press Think. Retrieved from
  35. Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shirky, C. (2009, December 11). The net advantage. Prospect Magazine. Retrieved from
  37. Stacher, J. (2012). Adaptable autocrats: Regime power in Egypt and Syria. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tilly, C. (2006). Regimes and repertoires. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Weeden, L. (2002). Conceptualizing culture: Possibilities for political science. The American Political Science Review, 96(4): 713–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Billur Aslan Ozgul
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Social and Political SciencesBrunel University LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations