Advertisement

The Merits of Transparent Models

  • Konstantinos V. KatsikopoulosEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Models offer many services, of which ‘intermediate services’ are often neglected but nevertheless, we will argue, very useful for Operational Research. Examples of intermediate services of models are to provide insights, platforms for further discussion, and coherent stories, all of which allow practical and theoretical work to accumulate and continue. We argue that models which are transparent are more likely to deliver useful intermediate services than models which appear to be black boxes to practitioners or academics. The argument entails two points: (1) a definition of model transparency in behavioral sciences such as economics and psychology and its adjustment for Operational Research and (2) a discussion of some particular applications of behavioral models in Operational Research, which reveals the merits of transparency.

References

  1. Bond, M. (2009). Decision-making: Risk school. Nature, 461(7268), 1189–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Breiman, L. (2001). Statistical modeling: The two cultures. Statistical Science, 16, 199–231.Google Scholar
  3. Breiman L., Friedman J. H., Olshen R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Bruner, J. S. (1973). Beyond the Information Given: Studies in the Psychology of Knowing. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  5. Cutting, J. E. (2000). Accuracy, scope, and flexibility of models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee. (2018). Disinformation and ‘Fake News’: Interim Report. House of Commons.Google Scholar
  7. Franco, L. A., & Montibeller, G. (2010). Facilitated modelling in operational research. European Journal of Operational Research, 205(3), 489–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hertwig, R., & Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2017). Nudging and boosting: Steering or empowering good decisions? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 973–986.Google Scholar
  9. Jackson, P. (1998). Introduction to Expert Systems. Boston: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  10. Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2011). How to model it? Review of “cognitive modeling” (J. R. Busemeyer and A. Diederich). Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55(2), 198–201.Google Scholar
  11. Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2014). Bounded rationality: The two cultures. Journal of Economic Methodology, 21, 361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Katsikopoulos, K. V., Durbach, I. N., & Stewart, T. J. (2018). When should we use simple decision models? A synthesis of various research strands. Omega—The International Journal of Management Science, 81, 17–25.Google Scholar
  13. Katsikopoulos, K. V., Simsek, O., Buckmann, M., & Gigerenzer, G. (in press). Classification in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  14. Keller, N., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2016). On the role of psychological heuristics in operational research; and a demonstration in military stability operations. European Journal of Operational Research, 249, 1063–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kunc, M., Malpass, J., & White, L. (Eds.) (2016). Behavioral Operational Research: Theory, Methodology and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
  16. Lichtman, A. J. (2016). Predicting the Next President: The Keys to the White House. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  17. Liptak, A. (2017, May 1). Sent to prison by a software program’s secret algorithms. The New York Times.Google Scholar
  18. Lipton, Z. C. (2016). The mythos of model interpretability. ICML Workshop on Human Interpretability in Machine Learning.Google Scholar
  19. Luan, S., Schooler, L. J., & Gigerenzer, G. (2011). A signal-detection analysis of fast-and-frugal trees. Psychological Review, 118(2), 316–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ma, A. (2018, October 29). China has started ranking citizens with a creepy ‘social credit’ system—Here’s what you can do wrong, and the embarrassing, demeaning ways they can punish you. UK Business Insider.Google Scholar
  21. Martignon, L., Katsikopoulos, K. V., & Woike, J. K. (2008). Categorization with limited resources: A family of simple heuristics. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52(6), 352–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morgan, M. S., & Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2013). Modeling practices in the social and human sciences: An interdisciplinary exchange. Perspectives on Science, 21, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rubinstein, A. S. 1998. Modeling Bounded Rationality. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Super, G. (Ed.). (1984). Start: A Triage Training Module. Austin: Texas Department of Health.Google Scholar
  25. Transatlantic Commission on Election Integrity. (2018). July 2018 Inter-Parliamentary Meeting at the Atlantic Council. Last accessed on November 6, 2018. http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/images/publications/Recommendations-from-the-July-16-Inter-Parliamentary-Meeting-at-the-Atlantic-Council.pdf.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southampton Business SchoolUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations