Advertisement

The Ethics of Postgraduate Supervision: A View from Cultural Studies

  • Liam GrealyEmail author
  • Timothy LaurieEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

What does good supervision, or advising, of higher degree research (HDR) look like? What implications have historical transformations in higher degree training had for conceptions of good or effective supervision? Are models of good supervision generalisable and, if not, what institutional and demographic factors might impede their uptake? This chapter considers these questions from the view of cultural studies, both for the critical tools the discipline offers to interrogate claims for the promotion of normative social models and for how such supervision models bear on HDR training within the discipline itself. In three parts, this chapter links the development of teaching skills around HDR supervision to broader institutional issues of working conditions and knowledge production. The chapter begins by comparing critical approaches to HDR supervision, including the recent turn towards supervisors’ ethical responsibilities in relation to what Christine Halse and Peter Bansel (Oxford Review of Education, 38(4), 377–392, 2012) call ‘learning alliances’. While endorsing conceptions of learning as a collective practice, we foreground instances where the language of moral obligation can risk displacing important conversations about affective labour and contractual precarity in an increasingly casualised tertiary sector. Building on these observations, we argue for critical engagement with the value- and community-making functions that HDR supervisors perform. Finally, specific challenges are identified for postgraduate (a.k.a. ‘graduate’) students working in cultural studies, especially when faced with interdisciplinary restlessness and methodological experimentation. Throughout, the chapter does not make strong prescriptions about what best practice supervision should look like, because the diversity of institutional circumstances makes the ‘actionable quality’ of such prescriptions somewhat negligible (Morris, Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 14, 433–450, 2008, p. 433). Nevertheless, we do identify points of tension between what good supervision practices hope to achieve and the changing institutional contexts within which these practices take place.

Works Cited

  1. Ahmed, S. (2012). On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Durham/London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amundsen, C., & McAlpine, L. (2009). “Learning Supervision”: Trial by Fire. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(3), 331–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ariès, P. (1962). Centuries of Childhood: A Social History of Family Life (Robert Baldick, Trans.). New York: Afred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Government Department of Education and Training. (2017). Key findings from the ‘Completion Rates of Higher Education Students – Cohort Analysis, 2005–2015’ report. URL https://docs.education.gov.au/node/46121. Last Accessed 1 Apr 2018.
  5. Barcan, R. (2013). Academic Life and Labour in the New University: Hope and Other Choices. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  6. Barcan, R. (2015). Learning to be an Academic: Tacit and Explicit Pedagogies. In G. Noble, M. Watkins, & C. Driscoll (Eds.), Cultural Pedagogies and Human Conduct (pp. 129–143). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Bartlett, A., & Mercer, G. (2000). Reconceptualising Discourses of Power in Postgraduate Pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(2), 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett, T. (2013). The Multiplication of Cultural Studies’ Utility. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 14(3), 438–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bennett, T. (2015). Cultural Studies and the Culture Concept. Cultural Studies, 29(4), 546–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boud, D., & Lee, A. (2005). “Peer Learning” as Pedagogic Discourse for Research Education. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 501–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Conclusion: Classes and Classifications. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (R. Nice, Trans.). (pp. 466–481). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1997). The Forms of Capital. In A. H. Halsey et al. (Eds.), Education: Culture, Economy, and Society (pp. 46–58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, T., Goodman, J., & Yasukawa, K. (2010). Academic Casualisation in Australia: Class Divisions in the University. Journal of Industrial Relations, 52(2), 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Connell, R. W. (1985). How to Supervise a PhD. Vestes, 2, 38–40.Google Scholar
  15. Connell, R. W. (2007). Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  16. Connell, R. W., & Manathunga, C. (2012). On Doctoral Education: How to Supervise a PhD, 1985–2011. Australian Universities’ Review, 54(1), 5–9.Google Scholar
  17. Coughlan, S. (2014, October 12). Labour’s Hunt Urges “Hippocratic Oath” for Teachers. BBC News. URL http://www.bbc.com/news/education-29482160
  18. De Certeau, M. (1988 [1974]). The Practice of Everyday Life (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Deleuze, G. (1972 [1964]). Proust and Signs (R. Howard, Trans.). New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
  20. Devlin, M. (2013). Bridging Socio-Cultural Incongruity: Conceptualising the Success of Students from Low Socio-Economic Status Backgrounds in Australian Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(6), 939–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Devlin, M., et al. (2012). Effective Teaching and Support of Students from Low Socioeconomic Status Backgrounds: Practical Advice for Teaching Staff. Sydney: Office for Teaching and Learning, Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education.Google Scholar
  22. Dewey, J. (1997 [1938]). Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  23. Durden, E., Govender, E., & Reddy, S. (2014). Higher Degree (Un)Consciousness. In A. Wardrop & D. Withers (Eds.), The Para-Academic Handbook: A Toolkit for Making, Learning, Creating, Acting (pp. 140–163). Bristol: HammerOn Press.Google Scholar
  24. Frow, J. (1988). Discipline and Discipleship. Textual Practice, 2(3), 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frow, J. (1995). Cultural Studies and Cultural Value. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  26. Frow, J. (2007). Australian Cultural Studies: Theory, Story History. Postcolonial Studies, 10(1), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frow, J. (2013). On Knowing and Mattering. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 14(3), 447–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gidley, J., et al. (2010). From Access to Success: An Integrated Approach to Quality Higher Education Informed by Social Inclusion Theory and Practice. Higher Education Policy, 23(1), 123–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gill, R. (2014). Academics, Cultural Workers and Critical Labour Studies. Journal of Cultural Economy, 7(1), 12–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gilroy, P. (1993). The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grealy, L. (2016). Cliché, Gossip, and Anecdote as Supervision Training. The Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 38(4), 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grealy, L., & Laurie, T. (2017). Higher Degree Research by Numbers: Beyond the Critiques of Neoliberalism. Higher Degree Research and Development, 36(3), 458–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Green, B. (2005). Unfinished Business: Subjectivity and Supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(2), 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Green, P., & Usher, R. (2003). Fast Supervision: Changing Supervisory Practice in Changing Times. Studies in Continuing Education, 25(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gregg, M. (2010). Working with Affect in the Corporate University. In M. Liljeström & S. Paasonen (Eds.), Working with Affect in Feminist Readings: Disturbing Differences (pp. 182–192). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Grossberg, L. (2010). Cultural Studies in the Future Tense. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Grossberg, L., Nelson, C., & Treichler, P. (1992). Cultural Studies: An Introduction. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural Studies (pp. 1–16). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Gunew, S. (1988). Authenticity and the Writing Cure: Reading Some Migrant Women’s Writing. Poetics, 17(1), 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hall, S. (1996). The Problem of Ideology: Marxism Without Guarantees. In K.-H. Chen & D. Morley (Eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies (pp. 24–45). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Halse, C. (2011). “Becoming a Supervisor”: The Impact of Doctoral Supervision on Supervisors’ Learning. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 557–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Halse, C., & Bansel, P. (2012). The Learning Alliance: Ethics in Doctoral Supervision. Oxford Review of Education, 38(4), 377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Halse, C., & Malfroy, J. (2010). Retheorising Doctoral Supervision as Professional Work. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Harris, A., & Lemon, A. (2012). Bodies that Shatter: Creativity, Culture and the New Pedagogical Imaginary. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 20(3), 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Harrison, N., Trudgett, M., & Page, S. (2017). The Dissertation Examination: Identifying Critical Factors in the Success of Indigenous Australian Doctoral Students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(1), 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kopytoff, I. (1984). The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (pp. 64–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lee, A. (2008). How Are Doctoral Students Supervised? Concepts of Doctoral Research Supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Low, R. Y. S. (2013). Can the “Under-Represented” Student Speak? Discerning the Subjects Amongst the Objects of Widening Participation in Higher Education. Australasian Journal of University-Community Engagement, 8(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  49. Mayhew, M. (2014). Marginal Inquiries. In A. Wardrop & D. Withers (Eds.), The Para-Academic Handbook: A Toolkit for Making, Learning, Creating, Acting (pp. 263–290). Bristol: HammerOn Press.Google Scholar
  50. McCallin, A., & Nayar, S. (2012). Postgraduate Research Supervision: A Critical Review of Current Practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Morris, M. (1988). The Pirate’s Fiancée: Feminism, Reading, Postmodernism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  52. Morris, M. (2008). Teaching Versus Research? Cultural Studies and the New Class Politics of Knowledge. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 14(3), 433–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Morris, M. (2011). Commentary: Coping with Cynicism. Cultural Studies, 25(1), 123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Morris, M. (2013). On the Power of Exhilaration. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 14(3), 449–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Muhs, G. G., Niemann, Y. F., González, C. G., & Harris, A. P. (Eds.). (2012). Presumed Incompetent: The Intersections of Race and Class for Women in Academia. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
  56. Pearson, M., & Brew, A. (2002). Research Training and Supervision Development. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pearson, M., Evans, T., & Macauley, P. (2008). Growth and Diversity in Doctoral Education: Assessing the Australian Experience. Higher Education, 55(3), 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rodman, G. B. (2014). Why Cultural Studies? West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sedgwick, E. K. (2003). Teaching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. New York: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Taylor, Y. (2013). Queer Encounters of Sexuality and Class: Navigating Emotional Landscapes of Academia. Emotion, Space and Society, 8, 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Trudgett, M. (2011). Western Places, Academic Spaces and Indigenous Faces: Supervising Indigenous Australian Postgraduate Students. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(4), 389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tsai, E. (2008). Learning to Labor: Thesis Supervision and Academic Work in the Graduate School. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 9(3), 451–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Turner, G. (2011). What’s Become of Cultural Studies? London: Sage.Google Scholar
  64. Turner, G. (2013). Practising Cultural Studies Today. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 14(3), 463–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Walpole, M. (2003). Socioeconomic Status and College: How SES Affects College Experiences and Outcomes. The Review of Higher Education, 27(1), 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zambrana, R. E., et al. (2015). “Don’t Leave us Behind” the Importance of Mentoring for Underrepresented Minority Faculty. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 40–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zweigenhaft, R. L. (1993). Prep School and Public School Graduates of Harvard: A Longitudinal Study of the Accumulation of Social and Cultural Capital. Journal of Higher Education, 64(2), 211–225.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of SydneyCamperdownAustralia
  2. 2.The University of Technology SydneyUltimoAustralia

Personalised recommendations