Advertisement

Fields of Practice: Theorising Partnership

  • Nicola Sim
Chapter
Part of the New Directions in Cultural Policy Research book series (NDCPR)

Abstract

Using the principles of multi-sited ethnography and Pierre Bourdieu’s theoretical writings, this chapter describes a methodological approach for researching and analysing spaces of partnership between galleries and youth organisations. The advantages and drawbacks of using multi-sited ethnography in geographically dispersed partnership programmes are outlined and discussed. The chapter also provides a step-by-step guide to utilising Bourdieu’s theory of fields and linked concepts of capitals and habitus to assess how professional worlds embed certain traditions, dispositions and practices. This framework is designed to highlight the different forces at play on the sectors, on organisations and individuals, which all have a bearing on partnership working. The chapter also looks to expand the limits of Bourdieu’s theoretical toolkit in order to interrogate programmes that bring fields together.

Keywords

Multi-sited ethnography Bourdieu Fields Capitals Doxa Symbolic violence Habitus Partnership 

References

  1. Baillie, Robin. 2015. The UNTITLED: The difference between young people and contemporary art. Presented by Richie Cumming at Youth work, informal learning and the arts: Exploring the research and practice agenda, The University of Nottingham, 18 April 2015.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, Tony. 2010. Introduction to the Routledge Classics edition. Pierre Bourdieu, 1984. In Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2013. Making culture, changing society. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1985. The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society 14 (6): 723–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 1993. Sociology in question. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loïc Wacquant. 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press in association with Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, Pierre, et al. 1999. The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society. Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, Elizabeth, and Luke Eric Lassiter. 2015. Doing ethnography today: Theories, methods, exercises. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Charmaz, Kathy. 2014. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Circuit. 2013. A guide to the Circuit evaluation framework. London: Tate.Google Scholar
  13. Clifford, James, and George E. Marcus. 1986. Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cooper, Charlie. 2012. Imagining ‘radical’ youth work possibilities—Challenging the ‘symbolic violence’ within the mainstream tradition in contemporary state-led youth work practice in England. Journal of Youth Studies 15 (1): 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cousins, Mark. 2014. Middle-class rules deaden too many arts venues. Let’s fill them with life and noise. The Guardian, August 10.Google Scholar
  16. Decoteau, Claire Laurier. 2016. The reflexive habitus: Critical realist and Bourdieusian social action. European Journal of Social Theory 19 (3): 303–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Delgado, Natalia Aguilar, and Luciano Barin Cruz. 2014. Multi-event ethnography: Doing research in pluralistic settings. Journal of Organizational Ethnography 3 (1): 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Denzin, Norman K. 1997. Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Down, Simon. 2012. A historiographical account of workplace and organizational ethnography. Journal of Organizational Ethnography 1 (1): 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Falzon, Mark-Anthony. 2009. Multi-sited ethnography: Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research. Oxon: Ashgate Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  21. Fitzsimons, Annette, Max Hope, Charlie Cooper, and Keith Russell. 2011. Empowerment and participation in youth work. Exeter: Learning Matters.Google Scholar
  22. France, Alan, Dorothy Bottrell, and Edward Haddon. 2013. Managing everyday life: The conceptualisation and value of cultural capital in navigating everyday life for working-class youth. Journal of Youth Studies 16 (5): 597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glass, Michael R., and Reuben Rose-Redwood. 2014. Introduction: Geographies of performativity. In Performativity, politics and the production of social space, ed. Michael R. Glass and Reuben Rose-Redwood. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grenfell, Michael. 2012. Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grenfell, Michael, and Cheryl Hardy. 2007. Art rules: Pierre Bourdieu and the visual arts. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  26. Hanley, Lynsey. 2016. Respectable: The experience of class. London: Penguin Random House UK.Google Scholar
  27. Hannerz, Ulf. 2003. Being there… and there… and there!: Reflections on multi-site ethnography. Ethnography 4 (2): 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haraway, Donna J. 1999. Modest witness@secondmillenium: Femaleman meets oncomouse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Hickey-Moody, Anna. 2013. Youth, arts and education: Reassembling subjectivity through affect. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ingold, Tim. 2008. Bindings against boundaries: Entanglements of life in an open world. Environment and Planning A 40 (8): 1796–1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lingard, Bob, and Shaun Rawolle. 2004. Mediatizing educational policy: The journalistic field, science policy, and cross-field effects. Journal of Education Policy 19 (3): 361–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marcus, George E. 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Massey, Doreen. 2005. For space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. McKenzie, Lisa. 2015. Getting by: Estates, class and culture in austerity Britain. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Neyland, Daniel. 2008. Organizational ethnography. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nicolini, Davide. 2009. Zooming in and zooming out: A package of method and theory to study work practices. In Organizational ethnography: Studying the complexities of everyday life, ed. Sierk Ybema, Dvora Yanow, Harry Wels, and Frans H. Kamsteeg. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Pink, Sarah, ed. 2012. Advances in visual methodology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Pringle, Emily. 2008. The artist as educator: An examination of the relationship between artistic practice and pedagogy within contemporary gallery education. Thesis, Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2014. Exploring the ‘Cs’: Cultural capital, critical race theory and Circuit. Circuit. Accessed 2 September 2014. https://circuit.tate.org.uk/2014/09/exploring-the-cs-cultural-capital-critical-race-theory-and-circuit/
  40. Rawolle, Shaun. 2005. Cross-field effects and temporary social fields: A case study of the mediatisation of recent Australian knowledge economy policies. Journal of Education Policy 20 (6): 705–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sayers, Esther. 2014. Making ‘culture vultures’: An investigation into the socio-cultural factors that determine what and how young people learn in the art gallery. Thesis, Goldsmiths, University of London.Google Scholar
  42. Silva, Elizabeth. 2008. Cultural capital and visual art in the contemporary UK. Cultural Trends 17 (4): 267–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Taylor, Tony. 2014. IDYW statement 2014. In Defence of Youth Work. Accessed 5 October 2015. https://indefenceofyouthwork.com/idyw-statement-2014/
  44. Thomson, Pat. 2017. Educational leadership and Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Willis, Paul. 1990. Common culture. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Yosso, Tara J. 2005. Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education 8 (1): 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zilber, Tammar B. 2014. Beyond a single organisation: Challenges and opportunities in doing field level ethnography. Journal of Organizational Ethnography 3 (1): 96–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicola Sim
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations