Advertisement

Standardizing Surgical Education: Implications for Quality of Care

  • Michael Phillip Choi
  • Alfons PompEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Surgical education in the USA has dramatically improved over the last century in large part due to the standardization of surgical training that was instituted after the Flexner Report and the formation of regulatory organizations in surgery such as the American Board of Surgery (ABS) and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). In the era of the 80-h resident work week, it is more imperative than ever those surgical training programs implement standardized and validated curricula that can adequately train and assess residents and fellows for their future roles as independent surgeons. This chapter will discuss the development of the standardized curriculum required of all trainees who are board certified in general surgery as well as the bariatric surgery fellowship curriculum and will outline their implications on quality of care in the field of bariatric surgery.

Keywords

Competency-based medical education (CBME) Entrustable professional activity (EPA) Surgical education Curriculum General surgery residency Standardization Bariatric surgery Fellowship ASMBS SAGES ABS Fellowship council 

References

  1. 1.
    Flexner A, Pritchet H, Henry S. Medical education in the United States and Canada bulletin number four (the Flexner report). New York: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1910.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cooke M, Irby DM, Sullivan W, Ludmerer KM. American medical education 100 years after the Flexner report. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(13):1339–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beck AH. The Flexner report and the standardization of American medical education. JAMA. 2004;291(17):2139–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carter BN. The fruition of Halsted’s concept of surgical training. Surgery. 1952;32(3):518–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buyske J. Standardizing surgical education: implications for quality of care. In: The SAGES manual of quality, outcomes and patient safety. Boston: Springer; 2012. p. 407–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Absurgery.org. About Us | American Board of Surgery. [online]. 2018. Available at: http://www.absurgery.org/default.jsp?abouthome. Accessed 25 Mar 2018.
  7. 7.
    Surgicalcore.org. SCORE | About SCORE. [online]. 2018. Available at: http://www.surgicalcore.org/public/aboutscore. Accessed 25 Mar 2018.
  8. 8.
    Absurgery.org. [online] .2018. Available at: http://www.absurgery.org/xfer/BookletofInfo-Surgery.pdf .Accessed 25 Mar 2018.
  9. 9.
    Absurgery.org. FAQs – New Assessment | American Board of Surgery. [online] 2018. Available at: http://www.absurgery.org/default.jsp?cc_faqs. Accessed 25 Mar 2018.
  10. 10.
    Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, Laycock R, Tesfay ST, Valentine RJ, Euhus DM, Jeyarajah DR, Thompson WM, Jones DB. Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? 1. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191(3):272–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peters JH, Fried GM, Swanstrom LL, Soper NJ, Sillin LF, Schirmer B, Hoffman K. Sages FLS Committee. Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery. 2004;135(1):21–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Korndorffer JR, Dunne JB, Sierra R, Stefanidis D, Touchard CL, Scott DJ. Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201(1):23–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Fayez R, Fried GM. Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room—a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg. 2010;199(1):115–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Borman KR, Vick LR, Biester TW, Mitchell ME. Changing demographics of residents choosing fellowships: longterm data from the American Board of Surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(5):782–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    The Fellowship Council and The American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Advanced GI surgery curriculum for bariatric surgery fellowship: 10.04.07 [cited 2018 Mar 23]. Available from: https://fellowshipcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Bariatric-Surgery.pdf.
  16. 16.
    Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, Bergman S, Leffondré K, Stanbridge D, Fried GM. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg. 2005;190(1):107–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mattar SG, Alseidi AA, Jones DB, Jeyarajah DR, Swanstrom LL, Aye RW, Wexner SD, Martinez JM, Ross SB, Awad MM, Franklin ME. General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors. Ann Surg. 2013;258(3):440–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McBride CL, Rosenthal RJ, Brethauer S, DeMaria E, Kelly JJ, Morton JM, Menzo EL, Moore R, Pomp A, Nguyen NT. Constructing a competency-based bariatric surgery fellowship training curriculum. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(3):437–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    ten Cate O, Scheele F. Competency-based postgraduate training: can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice? Acad Med. 2007;82(6):542–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell MedicineNew York Presbyterian HospitalNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations