Advertisement

The Unity Game Engine and the Circuits of Cultural Software

  • Benjamin Nicoll
  • Brendan Keogh
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes the ‘circuits of cultural software’ as a framework that guides the book and its analysis; offers a preliminary definition of game engines; and introduces the Unity game engine as the book’s core case study. It also discusses key terms such as cultural software, proprietary and commercial game engines, workflow, grain, literacy, and governance, and situates the book in relation to existing research on videogame production, game engines, and software culture. It briefly discusses Unity’s place in Australia’s videogame industry—which is where the research for the book was conducted—and provides a chapter outline.

Keywords

Cultural software Unity game engine Circuit of culture Game engine Software studies Platform studies 

References

  1. Adorno, Theodor, and Horkheimer, Max. 2002 (1947). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Apperley, Thomas H., and Daniel Golding. 2015. “Australia.” In Video Games Around the World, edited by Mark J. P. Wolf and Toru Iwatani. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Apperely, Thomas H., Darshana Jayemanne, and Bjorn Nansen. 2016. “Postdigital Literacies: Materiality, Mobility and the Aesthetics of Recruitment.” In Literacy, Media and Technology: Past, Present and Future, edited by Becky Parry, Cathy Burnett, and Guy Merchant, 203–218. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  4. Ash, James. 2015. The Interface Envelope: Gaming, Technology, Power. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  5. Banks, John. 2013. Co-creating Videogames. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  6. Banks, John, and Stuart Cunningham. 2016. “Creative Destruction in the Australian Videogames Industry.” Media International Australia 160 (1): 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry, David M., and Michael Dieter, eds. 2015. Postdigital Aesthetics: Art, Computation and Design. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Bogost, Ian. 2006. Unit Operations: An Approach to Videogame Criticism. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bratton, Benjamin H. 2015. The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brodkin, Jon. 2013. “How Unity3D Became a Game-Development Beast.” Dice, June 3. https://insights.dice.com/2013/06/03/how-unity3d-become-a-game-development-beast/.
  11. Bucher, Taina, and Anne Helmond. 2017. “The Affordances of Social Media Platforms.” In SAGE Handbook of Social Media, edited by Jean Burgess, Thomas Poell, and Alice Marwick, 234–253. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. 2011. Programmed Visions: Software and Memory. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Darchen, Sébastien. 2015. “‘Clusters’ or ‘Communities’? Analysing the Spatial Agglomeration of Video Game Companies in Australia.” Urban Geography 23 (2): 202–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dillet, Romain. 2018. “Unity CEO Says Half of All Games Are Built on Unity.” Techcrunch, September 5. https://techcrunch.com/2018/09/05/unity-ceo-says-half-of-all-games-are-built-on-unity/.
  15. du Gay, Paul, Stuart Hall, Linda Janes, Hugh Mackay, and Keight Negus. 1997. Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony Walkman. London: Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, Michel. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–79. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Freedman, Eric. 2018a. “Engineering Queerness in the Game Development Pipeline.” Game Studies 18 (3). http://gamestudies.org/1803/articles/ericfreedman.
  18. Freedman, Eric. 2018b. “Software.” In The Craft of Criticism: Critical Media Studies in Practice, edited by Michael Kackman and Mary Celeste Kearney, 318–330. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Game Developers’ Association of Australia. 2018. “What Game Engines Are Companies Using?” https://www.facebook.com/GameDevAssocAus/photos/a.1943622552593569/2062766267345863/?type=3&theater.
  20. Grayson, Nathan. 2018. “No, PUBG Is Not an ‘Asset Flip’.” Kotaku, 18 June. https://kotaku.com/no-pubg-is-not-an-asset-flip-1826935848.
  21. Grossberg, Lawrence. 1995. “Cultural Studies: What’s in a Name (One More Time).” Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education 1: 1–37.Google Scholar
  22. Grossberg, Lawrence. 1997. Bringing It All Back Home: Essays on Cultural Studies. Durham: Durham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grossberg, Lawrence. 2010. Cultural Studies in the Future Tense. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haas, John. 2014. “A History of the Unity Game Engine.” Interactive Qualifying Project. Worcester Polytechnic Institute. https://web.wpi.edu/Pubs/E-project/Available/E-project-030614-143124/.
  25. Harvey, Alison. 2014. “Twine’ Revolution: Democratization, Depoliticization, and the Queering of Game Design.” Game 3: 95–107.Google Scholar
  26. Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence Culture: When Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Keogh, Brendan. 2019. “From Aggressively Formalised to Intensely In/Formalised: Accounting for a Wider Range of Videogame Development Practices.” Creative Industries Journal 12 (1): 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kerr, Aphra. 2017. Global Games: Production, Circulation and Policy in the Networked Era. Routledge: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kirkpatrick, Graeme. 2013. Computer Games and the Social Imaginary. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kirschenbaum, Matthew G. 2016. Track Changes: A Literary History of Word Processing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kline, Stephen, Dyer-Witheford, Nick, and de Peuter, Greig. 2003. Digital Play: The Interaction of Technology, Culture and Marketing. Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lévy, Pierre. 1997. Collective Intelligence: Mankind’s Emerging World in Cyberspace. Cambridge: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
  33. Lobato, Ramon, and Julian Thomas. 2015. The Informal Media Economy. ‎Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Manovich, Lev. 2013. Software Takes Command. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  35. McCrea, Christian. 2013. “Australian Video Games: The Collapse and Reconstruction of an Industry.” Gaming Globally, edited by Nina B. Huntsman and Ben Aslinger, 203–207. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McRobbie, Angela. 2016. Be Creative: Making a Living in the New Culture Industries. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  37. Nieborg, David B., and Shenja van der Graaf. 2008. “The Mod Industries? The Industrial Logic of Non-market Game Production.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 11 (2): 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nieborg, David B., and Thomas Poell. 2018. “The Platformization of Cultural Production: Theorizing the Contingent Cultural Commodity.” New Media & Society 20 (11): 4275–4292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Donnell, Casey. 2014. Developer’s Dilemma. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Pedercini, Paolo. 2017. “Indiepocalypse Now: MadMaxing Attention Economies in the Age of Cultural Overproduction.” Molleindustria. http://molleindustria.org/indiepocalypse/.
  41. Qiu, Jack Linchuan, Melissa Gregg, and Kate Crawford. 2014. “Circuits of Labour: A Labour Theory of the iPhone Era.” tripleC 12 (2): 564–581.Google Scholar
  42. Srnicek, Nick. 2016. Platform Capitalism. Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  43. Unity. 2018. “Unity at GDC Keynote—March 19, 2018.” YouTube, March 19. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmRSkHl-Gv0.
  44. Whitson, Jennifer R. 2018a. “Voodoo Software and Boundary Objects in Game Development: How Developers Collaborate and Conflict with Game Engines and Art Tools.” New Media & Society 20 (7): 2315–2332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Whitson, Jennifer R. 2018b. “What Can We Learn From Studio Studies Ethnographies? A ‘Messy’ Account of Game Development, Materiality, Learning, and Expertise.” Games and Culture (OnlineFirst).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412018783320.
  46. Young, Christopher J. 2018. “Game Changers: Everyday Gamemakers and the Development of the Video Game Industry.” PhD diss., University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  47. Zhao, Sumin, Emilia Djonov, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2014. “Semiotic Technology and Practice: A Multimodal Social Semiotic Approach to PowerPoint.” Text&Talk 34 (3): 349–375.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin Nicoll
    • 1
  • Brendan Keogh
    • 1
  1. 1.Digital Media Research Centre, School of CommunicationQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations