Advertisement

Introduction

  • Adina Staicov
Chapter

Abstract

Staicov highlights the necessity to investigate linguistics practices and ethnic identity construction in Chinese Americans. This community and Asian Americans, in general, have received little scholarly attention—a striking fact considering the long history of Asian and Chinese immigrants in the United States. After a short introduction to San Francisco Chinatown, Staicov discusses how language use in the community can correlate with factors such as ethnicity, identity, or transnationalism. Focussing on first- and second-generation Chinese Americans, Staicov outlines how linguistic variation on the morphosyntactic level is used to index belonging to Chinatown, American mainstream society, or both.

References

  1. Bell, Allan. 2002. Back in style: Reworking audience design. In Style and sociolinguistic variation, ed. Penelope Eckert and John R. Rickford, 139–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Block, David. 2013. Issues in language and identity research in applied linguistics. ELIA 13: 11–46.Google Scholar
  3. Brubaker, Rogers. 2005. The ‘diaspora’ diaspora. Ethnic and Racial Studies 28 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2004. Language and identity. In A companion to linguistic anthropology, ed. Alessandro Duranti, 369–394. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2005. Identity in interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7 (4–5): 585–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. 2008. Finding identity: Theory and data. Multilingua 27: 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clifford, James. 1997. Routes: Travel and translation in the late twentieth century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Duff, Patricia A. 2015. Transnationalism, multilingualism, and identity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 35: 577–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edwards, John. 2009. Language and identity. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Espiritu, Yen Le, and Thom Tran. 2002. Viêt Nam, Nu’óc Tôi (Vietnam, My Country): Vietnamese Americans and transnationalism. In The changing face of home: The transnational lives of the second generation, ed. Peggy Levitt and Mary C. Waters, 367–398. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  12. Giles, Howard. 1978. Linguistic differentiation in ethnic groups. In Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations, ed. Henri Tajfel, 361–393. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Glick Schiller, Nina, Linda Basch, and Cristina Blanc-Szanton. 1992. Transnationalism: A new analytic framework for understanding migration. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 645: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Isurin, Ludmila. 2011. Russian diaspora: Culture, identity, and language change. New York: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Joseph, John E. 2004. Language and identity: National, ethnic, religious. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Labov, William. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Centre for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 1972. Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2000. The language war. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mayer, Ruth. 2005. Diaspora: Eine kritische Begriffsbestimmung. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  21. Milroy, Lesley. 1987. Language and social networks. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Milroy, Lesley, and James Milroy. 1992. Social network and social class: Toward an integrated sociolinguistic model. Language in Society 21: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. OED Online. 2016. Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/52085?redirectedFrom=diaspora#eid. Accessed 26 July 2016.
  24. Ong, Aihwa. 1993. On the edge of empires: Flexible citizenship among Chinese in diaspora. Positions 1 (3): 745–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. ———. 1999. Flexible citizenship: The cultural logics of transnationality. Durham/London: Duke.Google Scholar
  26. Padilla, Amado M., and William Perez. 2003. Acculturation, social identity, and social cognition: A new perspective. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 25 (1): 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Safran, William. 1991. Diasporas in modern societies: Myths of homeland and return. Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies 1 (1): 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stets, Jan E., and Peter J. Burke. 2000. Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly 63 (3): 224–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tabouret-Keller, Andrée. 1998. Language and identity. In The handbook of sociolinguistics, ed. Florian Coulmas, 315–326. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Tajfel, Henri. 1978a. Interindividual behaviour and intergroup behaviour. In Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations, ed. Henri Tajfel, 27–60. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 1978b. Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations, ed. Henri Tajfel, 61–76. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Tannen, Deborah. 1990. You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
  33. Trudgill, Peter. 1972. Sex, covert prestige, and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1: 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vertovec, Steven. 2001. Transnationalism and identity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 27 (4): 573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ———. 2005. The political importance of diasporas, Centre on Migration, Policy and Society Working Paper 13. Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  36. Williams, Ashley M. 2008. Brought-along identities and the dynamics of ideology: Accomplishing bivalent stances in a multilingual interaction. Multilingua 27: 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wong, Amy Wing-Mei. 2010. New York City English and second generation Chinese Americans. English Today 26 (3): 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wong, Amy Wing-mei, and Lauren Hall-Lew. 2014. Regional variability and ethnic identity: Chinese Americans in New York City and San Francisco. Language and Communication 35: 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zong, Jie, and Jeanne Batalova. 2017. Chinese immigrants in the United States. Migrationpolicy.org, 29 September 2017. http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/chinese-immigrants-united-states. Accessed 24 June 2019.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adina Staicov
    • 1
  1. 1.Writing CenterHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations