Advertisement

Civil Society in Ukraine

  • Maxim Gatskov
  • Kseniia Gatskova
Chapter

Abstract

On the eve of 2004/2005 and 2013/2014, Ukrainian citizens demonstrated a high—democratic, as it appeared—level of civil disobedience. Yet a sociological analysis shows that both “revolutionary” events had little impact on the development of the third sector organizations as well as attitudes that are associated with “civic culture”. The weakness of civil society in Ukraine can be explained by an adversarial relationship between the state and the third sector organizations, poor economic conditions in the country and a post-totalitarian psychological legacy. Nonetheless, even a weak third sector fulfils important functions, such as filling gaps of state administration (for example, in managing the refugee crisis), lobbying for reforms and supporting nation-building.

Keywords

Civil society Third sector CSO Volunteers Post-Soviet transformation Political culture 

References

  1. Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Åslund, A. (2009). How Ukraine became a market economy and democracy. Washington, DC: PIIE.Google Scholar
  3. Beissinger, M. R. (2013). The semblance of democratic revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine’s Orange Revolution. American Political Science Review, 107(3), 581–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burlyuk, O., Shapovalova, N., & Zarembo, K. (2017). Introduction to the Special Issue. Civil society in Ukraine: Building on Euromaidan legacy. Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal, 3, 1–22.Google Scholar
  5. Casanova, J. (1998). Between nation and civil society: Ethnolinguistic and religious pluralism in independent Ukraine. In R. W. Hefner (Ed.), Democratic civility: The history and cross-cultural possibility of a modern political ideal (pp. 203–228). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1992). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dalton, R. J., & Welzel, C. (Eds.). (2014). The civic culture transformed: From allegiant to assertive citizens. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. D’Anieri, P. (Ed.). (2010). Orange Revolution and aftermath: Mobilization, apathy, and the state in Ukraine. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
  9. Falsini, S. (2018). The Euromaidan’s effect on civil society: Why and how Ukrainian social capital increased after the Revolution of Dignity. Stuttgart, Germany: Ibidem Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gatskov, M. (2015). Political orientations and state crises in Ukraine in 2004/05 and 2013/14. In E. Bakalova, T. Endrich, K. Shlyakhtovska, & G. Spodarets (Eds.), Ukraine. Krisen. Perspektiven: Interdisziplinäre Betrachtungen eines Landes im Umbruch (pp. 119–140). Berlin, Germany: wvb.Google Scholar
  11. Gatskov, M., & Gatskova, K. (2015). Zum Anstieg der Religiosität in der postsowjetischen Ukraine: Empirische Befunde und theoretische Erklärungsansätze. In K. Boeckh & O. Turij (Eds.), Religiöse Pluralität als Faktor des Politischen in der Ukraine (pp. 153–187). München, Germany: Kubon & Sagner.Google Scholar
  12. Gatskova, K., & Gatskov, M. (2016). Third sector in Ukraine: Civic engagement before and after the “Euromaidan”. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27, 673–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghosh, M. (2014). In search of sustainability: Civil society in Ukraine. Berlin, Germany: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
  14. Glasius, M. (2010). Uncivil society. In H. K. Anheier & S. Toepler (Eds.), International encyclopedia of civil society (pp. 1583–1588). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Golovakha, E., & Panina, N. (1994). The development of a democratic political identity in contemporary Ukrainian political culture. In R. F. Farnen (Ed.), Nationalism, ethnicity, and identity (pp. 403–422). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Gromadzki, G., Movchan, V., Riabchuk, M., Solonenko, I., Stewart, S., Sushko, O., & Wolczuk, K. (2010). Beyond colours: Assets and liabilities of “post-orange” Ukraine. Kyiv: International Renaissance Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Hedström, P. (2005). Dissecting the social: On the principles of analytical sociology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Howard, M. M. (2003). The weakness of civil society in post-communist Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kappeler, A. (2014). Kleine Geschichte der Ukraine (4th ed.). München, Germany: C.H. Beck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keane, J. (1998). Civil society: Old images, new visions. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kolodii, A. (2009). Temporary post-communist authoritarianism and democracy: Ukraine 1990–1994. In J. Maćków (Ed.), Autoritarismus in Mittel- und Osteuropa (pp. 138–164). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krasynska, S., & Martin, E. (2017). The formality of informal civil society: Ukraine’s Euromaidan. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(1), 420–449.Google Scholar
  25. Kuzio, T. (2000). The national factor in Ukraine’s quadruple transition. Contemporary Politics, 6(2), 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewada, J. (1993). Die Sowjetmenschen 1989–1991. Soziogramm eines Zerfalls. München, Germany: dtv.Google Scholar
  27. Mitrokhin, N. (2001). Aspects of the religious situation in Ukraine. Religion, State & Society, 29(3), 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oleinik, A. (2018). Volunteers in Ukraine: From provision of services to state- and nation-building. Journal of Civil Society, 14(4), 364–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Onuch, O. (2014). Who were the protesters? Journal of Democracy, 25(3), 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Palyvoda, L., Vinnikov, O., & Kupriy, V. (2016). Defining civil society for Ukraine (Research report). Kyiv, Ukraine: CCC Creative Center.Google Scholar
  31. Parandii, C., & Jaráblik, B. (2018). Civil society and Ukraine’s reforms: Mission exhausted? In N. Shapovalova & O. Burlyuk (Eds.), Civil society in post-Euromaidan Ukraine: From revolution to consolidation (pp. 41–68). Stuttgart, Germany: ibidem Press.Google Scholar
  32. Petryna, A. (2002). Life exposed: Biological citizens after Chernobyl. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Pishchikova, K. (2018). How open is the civic space in post-Euromaidan Ukraine? In N. Shapovalova, & O. Burlyuk (Eds.), Civil society in post-Euromaidan Ukraine: From revolution to consolidation (pp. 41–68). Stuttgart, Germany: ibidem Press.Google Scholar
  34. Riabchuk, M. (2009). Dubious strength of a “weak state”: The post-Soviet Ukraine in the nineties. In J. Maćków (Ed.), Autoritarismus in Mittel- und Osteuropa (pp. 262–274). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. Shapovalova, N., & Burlyuk, O. (Eds.). (2018). Civil society in post-Euromaidan Ukraine: From revolution to consolidation. Stuttgart, Germany: ibidem Press.Google Scholar
  37. Stegnij, O. (2016). Die Umweltbewegung in der Ukraine nach Tschernobyl: Retrospektive und aktueller Stand. In M. Arndt (Ed.), Politik und Gesellschaft nach Tschernobyl: (Ost-) Europäische Perspektiven (pp. 53–77). Berlin, Germany: Ch. Links.Google Scholar
  38. Stepanenko, V. (2006). Civil society in post-Soviet Ukraine: Civic ethos in the framework of corrupted sociality? East European Politics and Societies, 20(4), 571–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stewart, S. (2009). NGO development in Ukraine since the Orange Revolution. In J. Bester-Dilgers (Ed.), Ukraine on its way to Europe (pp. 177–194). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Lang.Google Scholar
  40. Stewart, S., & Dollbaum, M. (2017). Civil society development in Russia and Ukraine: Diverging paths. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 50, 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. USAID. (2010/2011/2017/2018). The CSO sustainability index for central and eastern Europe and Eurasia. Retrieved March 1, 2019 from http://www.usaid.gov.
  42. Way, L. (2014). The Maidan and beyond: Civil society and democratization. Journal of Democracy, 25(3), 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilson, A. (2015). The Ukrainians: Unexpected nation (4th ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Worschech, S. (2017). New civic activism in Ukraine: Building society from scratch? Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal, 3, 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maxim Gatskov
    • 1
  • Kseniia Gatskova
    • 2
  1. 1.University of RegensburgRegensburgGermany
  2. 2.Leibniz Institute for East and Southeast European StudiesRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations