Attitudes About Privatization and the Shadow of Communism: 25 Years of Anti-market Scepticism
The authors investigate changing attitudes towards privatization of land and enterprises in Ukraine. The support of privatization declined dramatically in Ukraine from 1992 to 2018. Such a reversal of initial positive attitudes towards privatization has been observed in some transition countries. The literature suggests two hypotheses to explain this reversal. According to the shadow of communism hypothesis, people who were socialized during the period of communist regimes internalized specific ideas critical to privatization. The second one implies that people in social strata who have been disadvantaged by transition hold more negative views toward privatization. The authors review the previous literature and present new data from the Ukrainian Society survey. The data suggest that the shadow of communism hypothesis explains the case of Ukraine quite well.
KeywordsEconomic transition Economic attitudes Socialization Shadow of communism
- Åslund, A. (2009). How Ukraine became a market economy and democracy. Washington, DC: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar
- Braithwaite, J., Grootaert, C., & Milanovic, B. (2016). Poverty and social assistance in transition countries. New York: Springer. Google Scholar
- Denisova, I. (2016). Institutions and the support for market reforms. IZA World of Labor.Google Scholar
- Fukuyama, F. (2006). The end of history and the last man. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Gatskova, K., & Gatskov, M. (2016). Third sector in Ukraine: Civic engagement before and after the “Euromaidan”. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(2), 673–694.Google Scholar
- Guriev, S. (2018). Fairness and support for the reforms: Lessons from the transition economies (No. 24). SUERF Policy Note.Google Scholar
- Havlik, P., & Astrov, V. (2014). Economic consequences of the Ukraine conflict (Policy Notes and Reports 14). WIIW.Google Scholar
- Kohn, M. L., Slomczynski, K. M., Janicka, K., Khmelko, V., Mach, B. W., Paniotto, V., … & Heyman, C. (1997). Social structure and personality under conditions of radical social change: A comparative analysis of Poland and Ukraine. American Sociological Review, 62, 614–638. Google Scholar
- Milanovic, B. (1998). Income, inequality, and poverty during the transition from planned to market economy. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
- Mirimanova, N. (2017). Economic connectivity across the line of contact in Donbas (Working paper). Ukraine.Google Scholar
- North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Peisakhin, L. (2010). Living historical legacies: The “why” and “how” of institutional persistence—“The case of Ukraine.” Paper prepared for presentation at the 15th Annual World Convention of the Association for the Study of the Nationalities (pp. 15–17), Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
- Pop-Eleches, G., & Tucker, J. A. (2017). Communism’s shadow: Historical legacies and contemporary political attitudes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Restrepo Cadavid, P., Quintero Escobar, L. E., Stewart, B., McWilliams, K. L., Zhukova, S., Timofeev, A., … & Hamilton, D. A. (2015). Ukraine—Urbanization review. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
- Sutela, P. (2012). The underachiever: Ukraine’s economy since 1991. Retrieved March 31, 2019 from https://carnegieendowment.org/2012/03/09/underachiever-ukraine-s-economy-since-1991-pub-47451.
- Svolik, M. W. (2012). The politics of authoritarian rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- World Bank. (2019). Ukraine economic update. Retrieved July 22, 2019 from http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/677701558601578072/Ukraine-Economic-Update-Spring-2019-en.pdf.