Advertisement

The Normative Framework of (Mobile) Time: Chrononormativity, Power-Chronography, and Mobilities

  • Maren HartmannEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter weaves together two existing concepts problematizing the power and norms implied in and enacted through time and temporalities: the first concept is Freeman’s chrononormativity; the second is Sharma’s power-chronography. At the same time, the chapter adopts a third, less time-oriented paradigm: motilities. This combination of approaches is used to problematise the social inequalities inscribed in time in relation to (mobile) media use. This multiplication of norms underlines the increase in both social pressure (to use time wisely), while it simultaneously opens up the question of how far temporal regimes can be resisted. An introduction to these theoretical frameworks and their interlinkage will be slowly woven together with time- and media-biographical interview material from a recently completed research project.

References

  1. Arztmann, D. (2017). K_eine Zeit. Cripmagazine, 2, 12. http://cripmagazine.evaegermann.com/article/k_eine-zeit/. Accessed 15 Mar 2019.
  2. Boyd, D. (2012). Participating in the always-on lifestyle. In M. Mandiberg (Ed.), The social media reader (pp. 71–76). New York/London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ernst, W. (2013). From media history to Zeitkritik. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(6), 132–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Freeman, E. (2005). Time binds, or, erotohistoriography. Social Text, 84–85, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Freeman, E. (2010). Time binds: Queer temporalities, queer histories. Durham/London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grabham, E. (2014). The strange temporalities of work-life balance law. feminists@law, 4(1). https://journals.kent.ac.uk/index.php/feministsatlaw/rt/printerFriendly/101/262. Accessed 15 Mar 2019.
  7. Hartmann, M. (2016). Soziale Medien, Raum und Zeit. In M. Taddicken & J. Schmidt (Eds.), Handbuch Soziale Medien (pp. 367–387). Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Hartmann, M. (2018). Mobilising the homeless? A proposal for the concept of banal mobilisation. In S. Foellmer, M. Lünenborg, & C. Raetzsch (Eds.), Media practices, social movements, and performativity: Transdisciplinary approaches (pp. 59–80). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Hasse, M. (2014, April 22). Fast ständig online—Was macht das mit uns? Hamburger Abendblatt. https://www.abendblatt.de/ratgeber/wissen/article125101823/Fast-staendig-online-was-macht-das-mit-uns.html. Accessed 15 Mar 2019.
  10. Kaufmann, V. (2002). Re-thinking mobility. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  11. Kaufmann, V., Bergman, M. M., & Joye, D. (2004). Motility: Mobility as capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(4), 745–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  13. Morley, D. (2009). For a materialist, non media-centric media studies. Television & New Media, 10(1), 114–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ohlheiser, A. (2018, August 22). Parents worry about their teens’ smartphone habits. But what about their own? Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2018/08/22/parents-worry-about-their-teens-smartphone-habits-but-what-about-their-own/?utm_term=.6c5bd01fa1cd. Accessed 15 Mar 2019.
  15. Rosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosa, H. (2017). De-synchronization, dynamic stabilization, dispositional squeeze: The problem of temporal mismatch. In J. Wajcman & N. Dodd (Eds.), The sociology of speed: Digital, organizational, and social temporalities (pp. 25–41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sharma, S. (2012). It changes space and time. Introducing power-chronography. In J. Packer & S. B. C. Wiley (Eds.), Communication matters: Materialist approaches to media, mobility and networks (pp. 66–77). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Sharma, S. (2014). In the meantime. Temporality and cultural politics. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Sheller, M. (2018). Mobility justice. The politics of movement in an age of extremes. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  20. Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38, 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Spiegel Online. (2014). Immer erreichbar, immer erschöpft. http://www.spiegel.de/karriere/zwei-drittel-aller-angestellten-checkt-e-mails-nach-feierabend-a-1007983.html. Accessed 15 Mar 2019.
  22. Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  23. Vorderer, P. (2015). Der mediatisierte Lebenswandel. Permanently online, permanently connected. Publizistik, 60(3), 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wajcman, J. (2016). Pressed for time: The acceleration of life in digital capitalism. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Weber, M. (2005 [1930]). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Berlin University of the ArtsBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations