Trending Interconnectedness: The Value of Comparative Analysis

  • Sharon H. MastracciEmail author
  • Ian Tyler Adams


Global public administration represents an under-studied current within public administration scholarship, and the experiences of those who work within organizations which span international boundaries remain under studied as well. As challenges become increasingly global in nature—migration, environmental degradation, and cybersecurity threats—so must the policies to confront those challenges have international foci. International policy is administered by public servants, which in this context are international civil servants, whose work-life is governed by unique display rules. Managing the demands of those rules requires emotional labor, and in order to understand how it is experienced by international civil servants, an expanded comparative public administration must delve into both the home cultures of civil servants and the meta-culture of international public administration. “Boundary spanning” employees must balance national and subnational differences in both display rules and emotive demands. Yet, theories of emotional labor were primarily crafted within Western cultures, and scholarship has been slow to explore how the framework of emotional labor may differ around the globe. It is imperative that scholars investigate if and where differences exist in order to provide tools to international civil servants for managing their work in a diverse, global environment.


  1. Alimi, Deborah. 2015. “‘Going Global’: Policy Entrepreneurship of the Global Commission on Drug Policy.” Public Administration 93 (4): 874–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett, Michael N., and Martha Finnemore. 1999. “The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations.” International Organization 53 (4): 699–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauder, Harald. 2017. “Sanctuary Cities: Policies and Practices in International Perspective.” International Migration 55 (2): 174–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauer, Michael W. 2012. “Tolerant, If Personal Goals Remain Unharmed: Explaining Supranational Bureaucrats’ Attitudes to Organizational Change.” Governance 25 (3): 485–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broome, André, and Leonard Seabrooke. 2015. “Shaping Policy Curves: Cognitive Authority in Transnational Capacity Building.” Public Administration 93 (4): 956–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Busch, Per-Olof. 2014. “Independent Influence of International Public Administrations: Contours and Future Directions of an Emerging Research Strand.” In Public Administration in the Context of Global Governance, edited by Soonhee Kim, Shena Ashley Shena, and W. Henry Lambright, 45–62. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Carlson, Dawn, Merideth Ferguson, Emily Hunter, and Dwayne Whitten. 2012. “Abusive Supervision and Work–Family Conflict: The Path through Emotional Labor and Burnout.” The Leadership Quarterly 23 (5): 849–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carr, Adrian N. 1994. “The ‘Emotional Fallout’ of the New Efficiency Movement in Public Administration in Australia: A Case Study.” Administration & Society 26 (3): 344–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chatzea, Vasiliki-Eirini, Dimitra Sifaki-Pistolla, Sofia-Aikaterini Vlachaki, Evangelos Melidoniotis, and Georgia Pistolla. 2018. “PTSD, Burnout and Well-Being Among Rescue Workers: Seeking to Understand the Impact of the European Refugee Crisis on Rescuers.” Psychiatry Research 262: 446–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheung, Anthony B. L. 2012. “Public Administration in East Asia: Legacies, Trajectories and Lessons.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 78 (2): 209–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dahl, Robert A. 1947. “The Science of Public Administration: Three Problems.” Public Administration Review 7 (1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duncan, Magdaline. 2018. “Half of Aquarius Rescue Boat Migrants Want to Seek Asylum in France.” POLITICO, June 18.
  13. Eckhard, Steffen, and Jörn Ege. 2016. “International Bureaucracies and Their Influence on Policy-Making: A Review of Empirical Evidence.” Journal of European Public Policy 23 (7): 960–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edwards, Adrian. 2018. “Forced Displacement at Record 68.5 Million.” UN Refugee Agency, June 19.
  15. Ege, Jörn. 2017. “Comparing the Autonomy of International Public Administrations: An Ideal-Type Approach.” Public Administration 95 (3): 555–70. Scholar
  16. Eid, Michael, and Ed Diener. 2001. “Norms for Experiencing Emotions in Different Cultures: Inter- and Intranational Differences.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (5): 869–85. Scholar
  17. European Union. 2015. “EUR-Lex—01962R0031-20140501—EN—EUR-Lex.” EUR-Lex Access to European Union Law.
  18. Finkelstein, Lawrence S. 1995. “What Is Global Governance.” Global Governance 1: 367.Google Scholar
  19. Fitzpatrick, Jody, Malcolm Goggin, Tanya Heikkila, Donald Klingner, Jason Machado, and Christine Martell. 2011. “A New Look at Comparative Public Administration: Trends in Research and an Agenda for the Future.” Public Administration Review 71 (6): 821–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gore, Albert. 1993. Creating a Government That Works Better & Costs Less: Executive Summary. Report of the National Performance Review. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  21. Gökçen, Elif, Adrian Furnham, Stella Mavroveli, and K. V. Petrides. 2014. “A Cross-Cultural Investigation of Trait Emotional Intelligence in Hong Kong and the UK.” Personality and Individual Differences 65: 30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grandey, Alicia A. 2003. “When ‘the Show Must Go on’: Surface Acting and Deep Acting as Determinants of Emotional Exhaustion and Peer-Rated Service Delivery.” Academy of Management Journal 46 (1): 86–96.Google Scholar
  23. Gray, Andrew, and Bill Jenkins. 2006. “From Public Administration to Public Management: Reassessing a Revolution?” In Comparative Public Administration, edited by Eric E. Otenyo and Nancy S. Lind, 543–72. West Yorkshire, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Gulrajani, Nilima, and Kim Moloney. 2012. “Globalizing Public Administration: Today’s Research and Tomorrow’s Agenda.” Public Administration Review 72 (1): 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gunkel, Marjaana, Christopher Schlägel, and Robert L. Engle. 2014. “Culture’s Influence on Emotional Intelligence: An Empirical Study of Nine Countries.” Journal of International Management 20 (2): 256–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guy, Mary E., and Hyun Jung Lee. 2015. “Emotional Intelligence and Emotional Labor: How Related Are They?” Review of Public Personnel Administration 35 (3): 261–77.Google Scholar
  27. Guy, Mary E., Meredith A. Newman, and Sharon H. Mastracci. 2008. Emotional Labor: Putting the Service in Public Service. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  28. Heidbreder, Eva G. 2015. “Multilevel Policy Enforcement: Innovations in How to Administer Liberalized Global Markets.” Public Administration 93 (4): 940–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hensell, Stephan. 2016. “Staff and Status in International Bureaucracies: A Weberian Perspective on the EU Civil Service.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29 (4): 1486–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hochschild, A. R. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hofstede, G, G. J. Hofstede, and M. Minkov. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  32. Hooghe, Liesbet. 2005. “Several Roads Lead to International Norms, but Few via International Socialization: A Case Study of the European Commission.” International Organization 59 (4): 861–98.Google Scholar
  33. International Civil Service Advisory Board, United Nations. 2002. International Standards of Conduct for the International Civil Service. Accessed February 17, 2019.
  34. Johnston, Allanah, and Jörgen Sandberg. 2008. “Controlling Service Work: An Ambiguous Accomplishment Between Employees, Management and Customers.” Journal of Consumer Culture 8 (3): 389–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones, Lawrence R., and Donald F. Kettl. 2006. “Assessing Public Management Reform Strategy in an International Context.” In Comparative Public Administration, edited by Eric E. Otenyo and Nancy S. Lind, 883–904. West Yorkshire, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. Jreisat, Jamil E. 2005. “Comparative Public Administration Is Back in, Prudently.” Public Administration Review 65 (2): 231–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jreisat, Jamil E. 2014. “Public Administration in a Changing Context.” In Public Administration in the Context of Global Governance, edited by Soonhee Kim, Shena Ashley, and W. Henry Lambright, 22–27. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  38. Juncos, Ana E., and Karolina Pomorska. 2013. “‘In the Face of Adversity’: Explaining the Attitudes of EEAS Officials Vis-à-Vis the New Service.” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (9): 1332–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim, Soonhee, Shena Ashley, and W. Henry Lambright. 2014. Public Administration in the Context of Global Governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Kütting, Gabriela, and Philip G. Cerny. 2015. “Rethinking Global Environmental Policy: From Global Governance to Transnational Neopluralism.” Public Administration 93 (4): 907–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. La Palombara, Joseph. 2006. “An Overview of Bureaucracy and Political Development.” In Comparative Public Administration, edited by Eric E. Otenyo and Nancy S. Lind, 193–220. West Yorkshire, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Lambright, W. Henry. 2014. “Transboundary Leadership in Science and Technology: The International Space Station.” In Public Administration in the Context of Global Governance, edited by Soonhee Kim, Shena Ashley, and W. Henry Lambright, 28–34. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Lauer, Josh. 2008. “Alienation in the Information Economy: Toward a Marxist Critique of Consumer Surveillance.” In Participation and Media Production: Critical Reflections on Content Creation, edited by Nico Carpentier and Benjamin De Cleen, 41–53. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
  44. LeGrand, Tim. 2015. “Transgovernmental Policy Networks in the Anglosphere.” Public Administration 93 (4): 973–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lodge, Martin. 2014. “Regulation in Crisis: Reputation, Capacity and Limitations.” In Public Administration in the Context of Global Governance, edited by Soonhee Kim, Shena Ashley, and W. Henry Lambright, 96–115. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  46. Lynn, Laurence E. 2006. “The New Public Management as an International Phenomenon: A Skeptical View.” In Comparative Public Administration, edited by Eric E. Otenyo and Nancy S. Lind, 573–91. West Yorkshire, England: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  47. Mamudu, Hadii, Paul Cairney, and Donley Studlar. 2015. “Global Public Policy: Does the New Venue for Transnational Tobacco Control Challenge the Old Way of Doing Things?” Public Administration 93 (4): 856–73. Scholar
  48. Mao, Xiaorong, Olivia Wai Man Fung, Xiuying Hu, and Alice Yuen Loke. 2018. “Psychological Impacts of Disaster on Rescue Workers: A Review of the Literature.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 27: 602–17. Scholar
  49. Martin, Joanne. 1992. Cultures in Organizations: Three Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Mastracci, Sharon H., and Ian Adams. 2019. “Is Emotional Labor Easier in Collectivist or Individualist Cultures? An East-West Comparison.” Public Personnel Management 48 (3): 325–344. Scholar
  51. Mastracci, Sharon H., Mary E. Guy, and Meredith A. Newman. 2012. Emotional Labor and Crisis Response: Working on the Razor’s Edge: Working on the Razor’s Edge. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. McLaren, Robert I. 1997. “Organizational Culture in a Multicultural Organization.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 63 (1): 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Miller, Chris, Paul Hoggett, and Marjorie Mayo. 2006. “The Obsession with Outputs: Over Regulation and the Impact on the Emotional Identities of Public Service Professionals.” International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion 1 (4): 366–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mollah, Tooba Noor, Josefine Antoniades, Fathima Ijaza Lafeer, and Bianca Brijnath. 2018. “How Do Mental Health Practitioners Operationalise Cultural Competency in Everyday Practice? A Qualitative Analysis.” BMC Health Services Research 18 (1): 480.Google Scholar
  55. Moloney, Kim, James S. Bowman, and Jonathan P. West. 2018. “Challenges Confronting Whistleblowing and the International Civil Servant.” Review of Public Personnel Administration.
  56. Needham, Catherine, Sharon Mastracci, and Catherine Mangan. 2017. “The Emotional Labour of Boundary Spanning.” Journal of Integrated Care 25 (4): 288–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. O’Leary, Rosemary. 2014. “Toward an Open Systems Perspective of Global Public Administration Citizenship.” In Public Administration in the Context of Global Governance, edited by Soonhee Kim, Shena Ashley, and W. Henry Lambright, 9–14. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  58. Otenyo, Eric E., and Nancy S. Lind. 2006. “Comparative Public Administration: Growth, Method, and Ecology.” In Comparative Public Administration, edited by Eric E. Otenyo and Nancy S. Lind, 1–7. West Yorkshire, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  59. Papataxiarchis, Evthymios. 2016. “Being ‘There’: At the Front Line of the ‘European Refugee Crisis’.” Anthropology Today 32 (2): 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Putman, Nathan F., F. Alberto Abreu-Grobois, Inaky Iturbe-Darkistade, Emily M. Putman, Paul M. Richards, and Philippe Verley. 2015. “Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Impacts on Sea Turtles Could Span the Atlantic.” Biology Letters 11 (12): 20150596. Scholar
  61. Ratner, Carl. 2000. “A Cultural-Psychological Analysis of Emotions.” Culture & Psychology 6 (1): 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rayner, Julie, and Alan Lawton. 2018. “Are We Being Served? Emotional Labour in Local Government in Victoria, Australia.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 77 (3): 360–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Riggs, Fred W. 2006. “Conclusion: Impact of Globalization on the Study and Practice of Public Administration.” In Comparative Public Administration, edited by Eric E. Otenyo and Nancy S. Lind, 917–967. West Yorkshire, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  64. Rozakou, Katerina. 2017. “Nonrecording the ‘European Refugee Crisis’ in Greece: Navigating Through Irregular Bureaucracy.” Focaal (77): 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Savoie, Donald J. 2006. “What Is Wrong with the New Public Management?” In Comparative Public Administration, edited by Eric E. Otenyo and Nancy S. Lind, 593–602. West Yorkshire, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  66. Seabrooke, Leonard. 2014. “Identity Switching and Transnational Professionals.” International Political Sociology 8 (3): 335–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Spence, David. 2012. “The Early Days of the European External Action Service: A Practitioner’s View.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 7 (1): 115–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Steinberg, Ronnie J., and Deborah M. Figart. 1999. “Emotional Demands at Work: A Job Content Analysis.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 561 (1): 177–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stone, Diane, and Stella Ladi. 2015. “Global Public Policy and Transnational Administration.” Public Administration 93 (4): 839–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Suvarierol, Semin. 2008. “Beyond the Myth of Nationality: Analysing Networks Within the European Commission.” West European Politics 31 (4): 701–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Taras, Vas, Bradley L. Kirkman, and Piers Steel. 2010. “Examining the Impact of Culture’s Consequences: A Three-Decade, Multilevel, Meta-Analytic Review of Hofstede’s Cultural Value Dimensions.” Journal of Applied Psychology 95 (3): 405–39. Scholar
  72. Thomas, John Clayton. 2013. “Citizen, Customer, Partner: Rethinking the Place of the Public in Public Management.” Public Administration Review 73 (6): 786–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Triandis, Harry C. 2002. “Individualism—Collectivism and Personality.” Personality 69 (6): 907–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. UNHCR. 2018. “IOM, UNHCR Appeal for Region-Wide Action by EU Countries over Mediterranean Tragedies.” UN Refugee Agency, June 27.
  75. United Nations. 1945. “Charter of the United Nations.”
  76. Van Gelderen, Benjamin R., Arnold B. Bakker, Elly A. Konijn, and Evangelia Demerouti. 2011. “Daily Suppression of Discrete Emotions During the Work of Police Service Workers and Criminal Investigation Officers.” Anxiety, Stress & Coping 24 (5): 515–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Van Wart, Montgomery, and Joseph Cayer. 1990. “Comparative Public Administration: Defunct, Dispersed, or Redefined?” Public Administration Review 50 (2): 238–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vickers, Margaret H., and Alexander Kouzmin. 2001. “‘Resilience’ in Organizational Actors and Rearticulating ‘Voice’: Towards a Humanistic Critique of New Public Management.” Public Management Review 3 (1): 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Weber, Max. 1921/1968. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Translated and Edited by G. Roth and C. Wittich. New York: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar
  80. Winfield, Nicole, and Aritz Parra. 2018. “Spain Offers to Accept Migrant Ship after Italy, Malta Refuse.” Christian Science Monitor, June 11.
  81. Wolff, Sarah. 2015. “EU Budget Support as a Transnational Policy Instrument: Above and Beyond the State?” Public Administration 93 (4): 922–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Xu, Yi-Chong, and Patrick Weller. 2008. “‘To Be, But Not to Be Seen’: Exploring the Impact of International Civil Servants.” Public Administration 86 (1): 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ziring, Lawrence, Robert E. Riggs, and Jack C. Plano. 2005. The United Nations: International Organization and World Politics. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations