Advertisement

Minimizing Conversion in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: From Preoperative Risk Assessment to Intraoperative Strategies

  • John Byrn
  • Heather YeoEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Since its first description in 1991, the use of laparoscopy for colorectal surgery has increased from 22.7% in 2005 to 49.8% in 2014. Increased adoption of laparoscopy is multifactorial and largely due to improved instrumentation and training and supported by demonstration of clinical benefits as well as level I evidence in support of oncologic safety when applied to colon cancer. Conversion rates have remained variable based on case volume but can be reduced with training and increased familiarity with surgical techniques described throughout this colorectal textbook. This chapter will review risk factors for conversion and discuss tips and tricks on how to avoid conversion during laparoscopic colorectal resections.

Keywords

Conversion Laparoscopic Colon and rectal surgery 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The chapter authors would like to thank Yuko Tonohira for creating the three illustrations in this chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    Fingar KR, Stocks C, Weiss AJ, Steiner CA. Most frequent operating room procedures performed in U.S. hospitals, 2003–2012. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014. HCUP Statistical Brief #186.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davis CH, Shirkey BA, Moore LW, Gaglani T, Du XL, Bailey HR, et al. Trends in laparoscopic colorectal surgery over time from 2005-2014 using the NSQIP database. J Surg Res. 2018;223:16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand HS, Fleshman J, Anvari M, et al. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(20):2050–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Crawshaw BP, Chien HL, Augestad KM, Delaney CP. Effect of laparoscopic surgery on health care utilization and costs in patients who undergo colectomy. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(5):410–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Massarotti H, Rodrigues F, O'Rourke C, Chadi SA, Wexner S. Impact of surgeon laparoscopic training and case volume of laparoscopic surgery on conversion during elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Color Dis. 2017;19(1):76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Masoomi H, Mills SD, Carmichael JC, Pigazzi A, Nguyen NT, et al. Outcomes of conversion of laparoscopic colorectal surgery to open surgery. JSLS. 2014;18(4):e2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MHGM, de Lange-de Klerk ESM, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1324–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bhama AR, Charlton ME, Schmitt MB, Cromwell JW, Byrn JC. Factors associated with conversion from laparoscopic to open colectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Color Dis. 2015;17(3):257–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thorpe H, Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Copeland J, Brown JM, et al. Patient factors influencing conversion from laparoscopically assisted to open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2018;95(2):199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Masoomi H, Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Mills S, Carmichael JC, Pigazzi A, Stamos MJ. Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic colorectal surgery to open surgery: does conversion worsen outcome? World J Surg. 2015;39(5):1240–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cameron IC. Management of acute cholecystitis in UK hospitals: time for a change. Postgrad Med J. 2004;80(943):292–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Csikesz NG, Singla A, Murphy MM, Tseng JF, Shah SA. Surgeon volume metrics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55(8):2398–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Midura EF, Jung AD, Hanseman DJ, Dhar V, Shah SA, Rafferty JF, et al. Combination oral and mechanical bowel preparations decreases complications in both right and left colectomy. Surgery. 2018;163(3):528–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hashizume M, Sugimachi K. Needle and trocar injury during laparoscopic surgery in Japan. Surg Endosc. 1997;11(12):1198–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, Quirke P, Guillou P, Jayne DG, et al. Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100(1):75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST study group trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246(4):655–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clancy C, O'Leary DP, Burke JP, Redmond HP, Coffey JC, Kerin MJ, et al. A meta-analysis to determine the oncological implications of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Color Dis. 2015;17(6):482–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW. Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg. 2005;242(1):83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97(11):1638–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang SB, Lim SB, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(7):767–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George V, Abbas M, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(13):1346–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, Hewett P, Clouston AD, Gebski VJ, et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(13):1356–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(7):477–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Lacy AM, Castells A, et al. Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2007;142(3):298–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M. Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg. 2008;247(5):819–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Siddiqui MR, Sajid MS, Khatri K, Cheek E, Baiq MK. Elective open versus laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: a meta-analysis with the Sigma trial. World J Surg. 2010;34(12):2883–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McCombie AM, Frizelle F, Bagshaw PF, Framptom CM, Hewett PJ, McMurrick PJ, et al. The ALCCaS trial: a randomized controlled trial comparing quality of life following laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61(10):1156–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.New York Presbyterian – Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of SurgeryNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations