Skip to main content

Laparoscopic and Robotic Hartmann’s Reversal: Strategies to Avoid Complications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The SAGES Manual of Colorectal Surgery

Abstract

Patients with complicated diverticulitis treated with emergent sigmoid colectomy and end-colostomy creation often never have the colostomy reversed. Patients undergoing reversal of the colostomy often have this performed in open fashion. In selected patients otherwise suitable for minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic or robotic-assisted Hartmann’s reversal can be considered. Minimally invasive Hartmann’s reversal can be a challenging procedure. Particular attention to preoperative planning can help carefully select appropriate patients, maximize chances of success, and minimize intraoperative complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Comparato G, Fanigliulo L, Aragona G, Cavestro GM, Cavallaro LG, Leandro G, et al. Quality of life in uncomplicated symptomatic diverticular disease: is it another good reason for treatment? Dig Dis. 2007;25(3):252–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Feingold D, Steele SR, Lee S, Kaiser A, Boushey R, Buie WD, et al. Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(3):284–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bailey MB, Davenport DL, Procter L, McKenzie S, Vargas HD. Morbid obesity and diverticulitis: results from the ACS NSQIP dataset. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(5):874–80 e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Steinemann DC, Stierle T, Zerz A, Lamm SH, Limani P, Nocito A. Hartmann’s procedure and laparoscopic reversal versus primary anastomosis and ileostomy closure for left colonic perforation. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015;400(5):609–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Royo-Aznar A, Moro-Valdezate D, Martín-Arévalo J, Pla-Martí V, García-Botello S, Espín-Basany E, et al. Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: a single-centre experience of 533 consecutive cases. Colorectal Dis. 2018;20(7):631–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kwak HD, Kim J, Kang DW, Baek SJ, Kwak JM, Kim SH. Hartmann’s reversal: a comparative study between laparoscopic and open approaches. ANZ J Surg. 2018;88(5):450–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin F, Boutros M, Da Silva GM, Weiss EG, Lu XR, Wexner SD. Hartmann reversal: obesity adversely impacts outcome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Park W, Park WC, Kim KY, Lee SY. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic Hartmann colostomy reversal. Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):306–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pei KY, Davis KA, Zhang Y. Assessing trends in laparoscopic colostomy reversal and evaluating outcomes when compared to open procedures. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:695–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brathwaite S, Latchana N, Esemuede I, Harzman A, Husain S. Risk factors for surgical site infection in open and laparoscopic Hartmann closure: a multivariate analysis. Surg Laparosc Percutan Tech. 2017;27(1):51–3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Horesh N, Lessing Y, Rudnicki Y, Kent I, Kammar H, Ben-Yaacov A, et al. Considerations for Hartmann’s reversal and Hartmann’s reversal outcomes-a multicenter study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32(11):1577–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arkenbosch J, Miyagaki H, Kumara HM, Yan X, Cekic V, Whelan RL. Efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted approach for reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: results from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2109–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Richards CH, Roxburgh CS, Scottish Surgical Research Group (SSRG). Surgical outcome in patients undergoing reversal of Hartmann’s procedures: a multicentre study. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17(3):242–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Horesh N, Lessing Y, Rudnicki Y, Kent I, Kammar H, Ben-Yaacov A, et al. Comparison between laparoscopic and open Hartmann's reversal: results of a decade-long multicenter retrospective study. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:4780–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang PF, Morgan MJ. Laparoscopic versus open reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: a retrospective review. ANZ J Surg. 2014;84:965–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. de’Angelis N, Brunetti F, Memeo R, Batista da Costa J, Schneck AS, Carra MC, et al. Comparison between open and laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s procedure for diverticulitis. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;5(8):245–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven A. Lee-Kong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kleiman, D.A., Lee-Kong, S.A. (2020). Laparoscopic and Robotic Hartmann’s Reversal: Strategies to Avoid Complications. In: Sylla, P., Kaiser, A., Popowich, D. (eds) The SAGES Manual of Colorectal Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24812-3_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24812-3_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24811-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24812-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics