Advertisement

Transforming Meta-design from Paradigm to Working Theory

  • Daniel TetterooEmail author
Conference paper
  • 188 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11553)

Abstract

In a traditional product lifecycle, the design of the product typically predates its use. Meta-design is a paradigm rooted in end-user development research that aims to address this issue, by proposing a shift from the traditional design-time vs. use-time separation, towards a model where designers meta-design open ended systems that allow for future changes by end-users.

Meta-design has existed as a paradigm for almost 20 years, but is still not widely adopted in practice. The application and study of meta-design has been mostly limited to retrospective analyses, rendering the paradigm descriptive instead of prescriptive. The challenge remains in understanding the factors impacting the adoption of meta-design, and in predicting and explaining the factors that determine successful meta-designed environments. This paper proposes an approach towards building this understanding, in order to connect conceptual notions related to meta-design with knowledge obtained from studying its implementation.

Keywords

Meta-design Theory building 

References

  1. 1.
    Norman, D.A.: The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bødker, S., Iversen, O.S.: Staging a professional participatory design practice: moving PD beyond the initial fascination of user involvement. In: Proceeding of NordiCHI 2002, pp. 11–18. ACM, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maceli, M., Atwood, M.E.: From human crafters to human factors to human actors and back again: bridging the design time – use time divide. In: Costabile, M.F., Dittrich, Y., Fischer, G., Piccinno, A. (eds.) IS-EUD 2011. LNCS, vol. 6654, pp. 76–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21530-8_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fischer, G., Scharff, E.: Meta-design: design for designers. In: Proceeding of DIS 2000, pp. 396–405. ACM, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fischer, G., Fogli, D., Piccinno, A.: Revisiting and broadening the meta-design framework for end-user development. In: Paternò, F., Wulf, V. (eds.) New Perspectives in End-User Development, pp. 61–97. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60291-2_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E.: Meta-design: a framework for the future of end-user development. In: Lieberman, H., Paternò, F., Wulf, V. (eds.) End User Development. Human-Computer Interaction Series, vol. 9, pp. 427–457. Springer, Dordrecht (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5386-X_19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Souza, C.S.: Semiotic engineering: a cohering theory to connect EUD with HCI, CMC and more. In: Paternò, F., Wulf, V. (eds.) New Perspectives in End-User Development, pp. 269–305. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60291-2_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhu, L., Mussio, P., Barricelli, B.R.: Hive-mind space model for creative, collaborative design. In: Proceedings of the 1st DESIRE Network Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design, pp. 121–130. Desire Network, Lancaster (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Costabile, M.F., Fogli, D., Mussio, P., Piccinno, A.: End-user development: the software shaping workshop approach. Informatica 9, 1–23 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tetteroo, D., Markopoulos, P.: EUD survival “in the wild”: evaluation challenges for field deployments and how to address them. In: Paternò, F., Wulf, V. (eds.) New Perspectives in End-User Development, pp. 207–229. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60291-2_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Latour, B.: Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations