Advertisement

Personality, Dissociation and Organic-Psychic Latency in Pierre Janet’s Account of Hysterical Symptoms

  • Edmundo Balsemão PiresEmail author
Chapter
  • 85 Downloads
Part of the Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress book series (NAHP, volume 11)

Abstract

A definition of virtual or virtuality is not an easy task. Both words are of recent application in Philosophy, even if the concept of virtual comes from a respectable Latin tradition. Today’s meaning brings together the notions of potentiality, latency, imaginary representations, VR, and the forms of communication in digital media. This contagious, and spontaneous synonymy fails to identify a common vein and erases memory as a central notion. In the present essay, I’ll try to explain essential features of the concept of virtual, taking the investigation of memory troubles in Pierre Janet’s work as an exemplification. Pierre Janet’s work represents a rare combination of medical observation and description of symptoms of mental illnesses, therapeutic guidance in hypnosis and philosophical writing about the main psychological themes of an epoch in transition from a Metaphysics of the Soul to the modern Experimental Psychology. Pierre Janet’s intellectual evolution since the 1880s until the end of his life (1947) is dominated by the philosophical project of a theory of the psychic system supported by three basic pillars: a concept of personality, a theory of memory and a sketch of a general theory of conduct. Such complex endeavour cannot be abstracted from the initial connections with Jean-Martin Charcot’s school at La Salpêtrière which meant a turning point in the tradition of the “animal magnetism” concerning the treatment of epileptic-hysterical symptoms along with the contributions of Hyppolite Bernheim’s “Nancy School” of hypnotism. J.-M. Charcot’s or H. Bernheim’s theorising about the organic and psychological aspects of the hypnotic treatment of the hysterical symptoms was already aware of the difficulty in dealing with the extent of the dissimulation of the patients regarding the symptoms of the illness, under hypnotic suggestion, even if Charcot insisted in the identification and cataloguing of the organic expressions, such as contractures or the posture of the body in arc during the attacks. The precise location of the “great hysteria” in the organic-psychic corridor was itself a riddle. If a symptom is a special type of sign, in the case of the “great hysteria” nobody knew for sure what it stood for. The clinical symptom of the attack stood for an organic trouble with cerebral causes, a psychological interruption of the normal sensorial and muscular movements or a disguise of the female desire? Pierre Janet described many hysterical patients, somnambulism and multiple personality since his articles in La Revue Philosophique de la France et l’ Étranger, a Journal founded by the philosopher, experimental psychologist and his intellectual predecessor Théodule-Armand Ribot. The description of the case of the “great hysterical” Lucie, treated by him, is an example of a theoretical hypothesising on multiple personality and discontinuity of memories fragments. There are more cases revealing the same relation between hysteria, somnambulism, personality dissociation and “alternating memory”. Decisively inspired by and corroborating P. Janet’s ideas, S. Freud conceived also the essential of the hysterical sicknesses as disorders of memory. The theme of memory came even more to the foreground in the dissertation L’Automatisme Psychologique (1889). Here, the strange world of somnambulism was scrutinised along with hysterical contractures and convulsions, anaesthesia, the compulsion to repetition, obsessions, “automatic writing” in hysterical patients, multiple personality and “alternating memories”. In the depicted cases memory could not be taken as a homogenous series of remembrances or as a stock of disposable information but as a variable of the depth of the personalities’ inner formation. The so-called “seconde existence” of some somnambulists referred not only unconscious representations and unconscious thoughts but complete or inceptive latent personalities provided with multiple virtual existences and multiple memories. Hypnosis was the privileged technique to access to such multiple memories ignored by the official personality. Later and after the writing of his M.D. Dissertation, Contribution à l’ Étude des Accidents Mentaux chez les Hystériques (1893), P. Janet addressed again the themes of memory and alternating memories in a series of lectures at the Collège de France (1927–28) but now according to the larger framework of a general theory of conduct which included a description of the social actions participating in the narrative construction of personal memories, and the role of social memory.

References

  1. Arnaud, Sabine. 2015. On Hysteria: The Invention of a Medical Category between 1670 and 1820. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balsemão Pires, Edmundo. 2018. Uma Estética do Movimento (1870–1930). In Revista Filosófica de Coimbra, vol. 53, 9–48.Google Scholar
  3. Bergson, Henri. 1889. Essai sur les Données Immédiates de la Conscience. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
  4. Bergson, Henri. 1896, 1939. Matière et Mémoire. Essai sur la Relation du Corps à l’ Esprit. Paris: P. U. F.Google Scholar
  5. Bernheim, Hyppolite. 1884. De la Suggestion dans L’ État Hypnotique et dans L’ État de Veille. Paris: Octave Doin, Éditeur.Google Scholar
  6. Bernheim, Hyppolite. 1891. Hypnotisme, Suggestion, Psychothérapie. Paris: Octave Doin, Éditeur.Google Scholar
  7. Charcot, J.-Martin, and Paul Richer. 1887. Les Démoniaques dans L’Art. Paris: Adrien Delahaye et Émile Lecrosnier, Éditeurs.Google Scholar
  8. Freud, Sigmund, and J. Breuer. 1955. Studies on Hysteria. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. II, ed. S. Freud. London: The Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gillund, Gary, and Richard M. Shiffrin. 1984. A Retrieval Model for both Recognition and Recall. Psychological Review 91 (1): 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. James, William. 1890. 1950. The Principles of Psychology, 2 vols. New York: Dover Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Janet, Pierre. 1886a. Note sur quelques phénomènes de somnambulisme. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Etranger 21: 190–198.Google Scholar
  12. Janet, Pierre. 1886b. Les actes inconscients et le dédoublement de la personnalité pendant le somnambulisme provoqué. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Etranger 22: 577–592.Google Scholar
  13. Janet, Pierre. 1886c. Deuxième Note sur le Sommeil Provoqué à Distance et la Suggestion Mentale pendant l’ État Somnambulique (séance du 31 Mai 1886). Revue Philosophique de la France et de l´Étranger 22: 212–223.Google Scholar
  14. Janet, Pierre. 1887. L’ Anesthésie Systematisée et la Dissociation des Phénomènes Psychologiques. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l´Étranger 23: 449–472.Google Scholar
  15. Janet, Pierre. 1888. Les Actes inconscients et la Mémoire pendant le Somnambulisme. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l´Étranger 25: 238–279.Google Scholar
  16. Janet, Pierre. 1889. L’Automatisme Psychologique. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
  17. Janet, Pierre. 1890. Une Altération de la Faculté de Localiser les Sensations. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l´Étranger 29: 659–664.Google Scholar
  18. Janet, Pierre. 1892. Étude sur Quelques Cas d’ Amnésie Antérograde dans la Maladie de la Désagrégation Psychologique. In International Congress of Experimental Psychology, London. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
  19. Janet, Pierre. 1897. L’ Influence Somnambulique et le Besoin de Direction. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l´Étranger 43: 113–143.Google Scholar
  20. Janet, Pierre. 1911. L’ État Mentale des Hystériques. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
  21. Janet, Pierre. 1923. La Médicine Psychologique. Paris: E. Flammarion Éditeur.Google Scholar
  22. Janet, Pierre. 1929. L’ Évolution Psychologique de la Personnalité. Paris: Éditions Chahine.Google Scholar
  23. Janet, Pierre. 1938. Les Conduites Sociales. In Onzième Congrès Internationale de Psychologie, ed. Henri Piéron and Ignace Meyerson, 138–149. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
  24. Janet, Pierre. 2006. L’ Évolution de la Mémoire et la Notion du Temps. Leçons au Collège de France (1927–28). Paris: l’ Harmattan.Google Scholar
  25. Kintsch, Walter. 1988. The Role of Knowledge in Discourse Comprehension: A Construction-Integration Model. Psychotocical Review 95 (2): 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kintsch, Walter, David Welsch, Franz Schmalhofer, and Susan Zimny. 1990. Sentence Memory: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Memory and Language 29: 133–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Murdock, Bennett B. 1999. The Buffer 30 Years Later: Working Memory in a Theory of Distributed Associative Model (TODAM). In On Human Memory: Evolution, Progress, and Reflections on the 30th Anniversary of the Atkinson-Shiffrin Model, ed. Chizuko Izawa, 35–58. New York/London: Taylor and Francis Group, Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  28. Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1998. The Essential Peirce, Selected Philosophical Writings, 1893–1913, vol. 2. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Piéron, Henri. 1910. L’ Évolution de la Mémoire. Paris: Ernest Flammarion Éditeur.Google Scholar
  30. Ribot, Théodule-Armand. 1885. Les Maladies de la Personnalité. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
  31. Ribot, Théodule-Armand. 1914. La Vie Inconsciente et les Mouvements. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
  32. Richer, Paul. 1885. Études Cliniques sur la Grande Hystérie ou Hystéro-Épilepsie. Paris: Adrien Delahaye et Émile Lecrosnier, Éditeurs.Google Scholar
  33. Semon, Richard. 1921. The Mneme. London/New York: George Allen and Unwin, The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  34. Thornton, E.M. 1976. Hypnotism, Hysteria and Epilepsy. An historical Synthesis. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  35. Van Dijk, Teun A., and Walter Kintsch. 1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. Wundt, Wilhelm M. 1892. Hypnotismus und Suggestion. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculdade de LetrasUniversidade de CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations