Advertisement

The ‘West’ versus ‘the Rest’? Festival Curators as Gatekeepers for Sociocultural Diversity

  • Lisa GauppEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Sociology of the Arts book series (SOA)

Abstract

Gaupp analyses how sociocultural diversity is being standardized through conventions at renowned international performing arts festivals where a variety of performances from contemporary theatre, dance, music or visual arts are presented. Sociocultural diversity in these festivals refers preferentially to artists and audiences with different sociocultural backgrounds and different art forms, yet in ways that further marginalize their work as well as their status as artists. The chapter focuses on the role of the ‘festival curator’, understood both as a cultural broker, cultural intermediary as well as a gatekeeper who is embedded in a complex field of ‘the curatorial’. As postcolonial critique, the chapter shows how curatorial practice is deeply influenced by power relations and conventions, as well as network structures and processes. By doing so the chapter proposes that a transcultural perspective on diversity may provide a way to decolonize international arts management in general and curatorial practices more specifically.

References

  1. Amīn, K. (2014). Postcolonial modernity. Theatre in Morocco and the interweaving loop. In E. Fischer-Lichte, T. Jost, & S. I. Jain (Eds.), The politics of interweaving performance cultures: Beyond postcolonialism (Routledge Advances in Theatre and Performance Studies, Vol. 33) (pp. 25–41). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Amīn, K., & Laamiri, M. (2010). Performing cultural diversity: Critiquing postcolonialism (Series: Conderences and Colloquia) (1st ed.). Tetouan: Université Abdelmalek Essaâdi, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Research Group of Performance Studies.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance (Social Theory). London: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, H. S. (2008). Art worlds. Berkeley, CA; London; Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, A., Taylor, J., & Woodward, I. (Eds.). (2014). The festivalization of culture. Surrey and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  6. Beyes, T. (2007). Organisationstheorien von Agamben bis Žižek. Auf dem Basar der Organization Studies. In T. Eberle, E. Walter-Busch, & A. Sousa-Poza (Eds.), Fokus Organisation. Sozialwissenschaftliche Perspektiven und Analysen (pp. 65–86). Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
  7. Beyes, T. (2016). Art, aesthetics and organization. In B. Czarniawska (Ed.), A research agenda for management and organization studies (Elgar Research Agendas) (pp. 115–125). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beyes, T. (2018). Curating. In T. Beyes & J. Metelmann (Eds.), The creativity complex. A companion to contemporary culture (Kulturen der Gesellschaft) (1st ed., pp. 109–113). Bielefeld: Transcript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boltanski, L. & Chiapello, È. (2007). The new spirit of capitalism (1st Publ.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Burt, R. S. (2004). Strucural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Büscher-Ulbrich, D., Kadenbach, S., & Kindermann, M. (2013). Einleitung: “The more things change”. In D. Büscher-Ulbrich, S. Kadenbach, & M. Kindermann (Eds.), Innovation—Konvention. Transdisziplinäre Beiträge zu einem kulturellen Spannungsfeld (Kultur- und Medientheorie) (1st ed., pp. 7–20). Bielefeld: Transcript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Case, S.-E. (1990). Performing feminisms. Feminist critical theory and theatre. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Danto, A. C. (1964). The artworld. The Journal of Philosophy, 61(19), 571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Derrida, J. (2004). Die différance. Ausgewählte Texte. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
  17. Diaz-Bone, R. (2011). Einführung in die Soziologie der Konventionen. In R. Diaz-Bone (Ed.), Soziologie der Konventionen: Grundlagen einer pragmatischen Anthropologie (Theorie und Gesellschaft, Vol. 73) (pp. 9–41). Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  18. Dollereder, L. (2018). Netzwerkbildung im Musiksektor von Niedersachsen. Funktionsweisen und Mechanismen Sozialer Formationen. Lüneburg: Leuphana University of Lüneburg.Google Scholar
  19. Durkheim, É. (1973). Moral education. A study in the theory and application of the sociology of education (1, Free Press paperback ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Elfert, J. (2009). Theaterfestivals. Geschichte und Kritik eines kulturellen Organisationsmodells (Vol. 16). Bielefeld: Transcript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Featherstone, M. (2007). Consumer culture and postmodernism (Theory, Culture & Society). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Fischer-Lichte, E., & Roselt, J. (2001). Attraktion des Augenblicks—Aufführung, Performance, performativ und Performativität als theaterwissenschaftliche Begriffe. In Theorien des Performativen (pp. 237–253). Berlin: Akad.-Verl.Google Scholar
  23. Foucault, M. (1978). Dispositive der Macht. Über Sexualität, Wissen und Wahrheit (Merve titel, Vol. 77). Berlin: Merve.Google Scholar
  24. Gaupp, L. (2016). Die exotisierte Stadt. Kulturpolitik und Musikvermittlung im postmigrantischen Prozess (Studies in Music, Vol. 1). Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
  25. Gaupp, L. (2020). Epistemologies of diversity and otherness. In L. Gaupp & G. Pelillo-Hestermeyer (Eds.), Diversity and otherness—Transcultural insights into norms, practices and negotiations. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  26. Gaupp, L., & Kirchberg, V. (2017). Kulturelle Diversität in den Künsten zwischen Tradition und Zeitgenossenschaft. In L. Hieber (Ed.), Gesellschaftsepochen und ihre Kunstwelten (Kunst und Gesellschaft, Vol. 9) (pp. 377–388). Wiesbaden: VS Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Hall, S. (1994). The West and the rest: Discourse and power. In S. Hall & B. Gieben (Eds.), The formations of modernity (Introduction to Sociology) (pp. 275–331). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Helin, J., Hernes, T., Hjorth, D., & Holt, R. (2014). The Oxford handbook of process philosophy and organization studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hracs, B. J. (2013). Cultural intermediaries in the digital age: The case of independent musicians and managers in Toronto. Regional Studies, 49(3), 461–475.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.750425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Husemann, P. (2012). A curator’s reality check: Conditions of curating performing arts. In B. von Bismarck, J. Schafaff, & T. Weski (Eds.), Cultures of the curatorial (pp. 268–286). Berlin: Sternberg.Google Scholar
  31. Ismaiel-Wendt, J. (2011). Tracks’n’treks. Populäre Musik und postkoloniale Analyse. Münster: Unrast.Google Scholar
  32. Kadushin, C. (2012). Understanding social networks. Theories, concepts, and findings. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kaup-Hasler, V. (2012). NXT.STP. Documentation 2007–2012. Retrieved January 21, 2019, from https://www.nxtstp.eu/files/NXTSTP_5_years.pdf
  34. Langley, A., & Tsukas, C. K. (Eds.). (2017). The SAGE handbook of process organization studies. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Latour, B. (2013). ‘What’s the story?’ Organizing as a mode of existence. In D. Robichaud & F. Cooren (Eds.), Organization and organizing: Materiality, agency and discourse (pp. 37–51). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Lind, M. (2012). Performing the curatorial: An introduction. In M. Lind (Ed.), Performing the curatorial: Within and beyond art (pp. 9–22). Berlin: Sternberg Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lizé, W. (2016). Artistic work intermediaries as value producers: Agents, managers, tourneurs and the acquisition of symbolic capital in popular music. Poetics, 59, 35–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Luzina, S. (2015, July 2). Angélica Liddell bei “Foreign Affairs”. Die Bühnenmesse der Porno-Queen. Retrieved January 21, 2019, from https://www.tagesspiegel.de/kultur/angelica-liddell-bei-foreign-affairs-die-buehnenmesse-der-porno-queen/11997268.html
  39. O’Neill, P. (2012). The culture of curating and the curating of culture(s). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Peres da Silva, G., & Hondros, K. (Eds.). (2019). Music practices across borders: (E)Valuating space, diversity and exchange (Music and Sound Culture). Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  41. Raithel, J. (2002). Ethnisch-kulturelle Konfliktpotenziale unter Jugendlichen im (groß)städtischen Raum. Ein Vergleich zwischen deutschen und türkischen Jugendlichen. Soziale Probleme, 13(1), 54–79.Google Scholar
  42. Reckwitz, A. (2012). Die Erfindung der Kreativität. Zum Prozess gesellschaftlicher Ästhetisierung. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  43. Reed, M. I. (1992). The sociology of organizations. Themes, perspectives and prospects (Studies in Sociology, 1st Publ.). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  44. Rogoff, I., & von Bismarck, B. (2012). Curating/curatorial: A conversation between Irit Rogoff and Beatrice von Bismarck. In B. von Bismarck, J. Schafaff, & T. Weski (Eds.), Cultures of the curatorial (pp. 20–38). Berlin: Sternberg.Google Scholar
  45. Said, E. W. (1991). Orientalism (Penguin Books: Penguin History). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  46. Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices. A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schlagenwerth, M. (2015, Juni 29). Angelíca Liddell. Schreiben ist meine Rache. Retrieved January 21, 2019, from https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/kultur/angel%C3%ADca-liddell%2D%2Dschreiben-ist-meine-rache%2D%2D1299316
  48. Sierz, A. (2001). In-yer-face theatre: British drama today. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  49. Smith Maguire, J., & Matthews, J. (2014). Introduction: Thinking with cultural intermediaries. In J. Smith Maguire & J. Matthews (Eds.), The cultural intermediaries reader (S. 1–11). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Timm, T. (2011, Mai 5). Die Macht der Geschmacksverstärker, ZEIT online. Kunst. Retrieved December 6, 2012, from https://www.zeit.de/2011/19/Kunst-Kuratoren
  51. von Bismarck, B. (2003). Kuratorisches Handeln. Immaterielle Arbeit zwischen Kunst und Managementmodellen. In M. von Osten (Ed.), Norm der Abweichung (Theorie: Gestaltung) (pp. 81–98). Wien: Springer.Google Scholar
  52. von Bismarck, B., Schafaff, J., & Weski, T. (2012). Introduction. In B. von Bismarck, J. Schafaff, & T. Weski (Eds.), Cultures of the curatorial (pp. 7–16). Berlin: Sternberg.Google Scholar
  53. von Osten, M. (2003). Einleitung. In M. von Osten (Ed.), Norm der Abweichung (Theorie: Gestaltung) (pp. 7–17). Wien: Springer.Google Scholar
  54. Wallerstein, I. (1990). Culture as the ideological battleground of the modern world-system. In M. Featherstone (Ed.), Global culture: Nationalism, globalization, and modernity (Theory, Culture & Society) (pp. 31–55). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  55. Westen, M. (2012). How many nations are inside you? On cultural diversity, global art and art museums. In M. T. Horst & G. Schwartz (Eds.), Changing perspectives. Dealing with globalisation in the presentation and collection of contemporary art (pp. 76–85). Amsterdam: KIT.Google Scholar
  56. White, H. C. (1992). Identity and control. A structural theory of social action (Princeton Paperbacks: Sociology). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Willnauer, F. (2007). Musikfestspiele und Festivals. In Deutscher Musikrat (Ed.), Musik Almanach 2007/08. Daten und Fakten zum Musikleben in Deutschland (p. 63). Regensburg: Deutscher Musikrat.Google Scholar
  58. Yıldız, E. (2013). Postmigrantische Verortungspraktiken. Ethnische Mythen irritieren. In P. Mecheril (Ed.), Migrationsforschung als Kritik? Spielräume kritischer Migrationsforschung (pp. 139–156). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leuphana University of LüneburgLüneburgGermany

Personalised recommendations