Advertisement

Video Installation and the Agency of the Viewer

  • Diane CharlesonEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Video installation as a medium offers filmmakers a means to explore nonlinear approaches to filmmaking that break away from the more traditional viewing and presentation of a film that has linear storytelling at its core. This medium offers its viewers new forms of experience. The viewer, I suggest, can be likened to a flaneur, as featured in Walter Benjamin’s, “Arcades,” but whom I imbue with particular qualities. I draw on Actor Network theory to investigate this new relationship between the viewer and the viewed and suggest that video installation can help create a new balance of power, where the viewer can become meaning-maker rather than merely meaning-taker. This I suggest can happen when the images are viewed in an immersive environment. In order to illustrate this, I discuss my video installation “Dancing with Mrs. Dale,” a two-screen installation based on found Super 8 home movies. This installation was part of an exhibition I created “Digital remembering” and I discuss my work in relation to this.

Bibliography

  1. Andrea, S. Screening the Museum Aesthetic: Auteurs in Transnational Heritage Film. PhD, University of Washington, USA, 2016 [Online]. Available at https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/bitstream/handle/1773/38102/Schmidt_washington_0250E_16646.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed May 2019.
  2. Baudelaire, C., and P. E. Charvet. Selected Writings on Art and Artists [of] Baudelaire. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972.Google Scholar
  3. Bishop, C. Installation Art: A Critical History. New York: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
  4. Charleson, D. Digital Remembering. Melbourne: RMIT University, 2007. Available at https://www.intersect.rmit.edu.au/-ps-sr-/digital-remembering. Accessed April 2018.
  5. Charleson, D. “Video Installation, Memory and Storytelling: The Viewer as Narrator.” Image and Narrative 12, no. 2 (2011): 17–30.Google Scholar
  6. Charleson, D. “Video Installation, Memory and Storytelling: The Viewer as Narrator.” Image and Narrative: Online Magazine of the Visual Narrative 12 (2011): 17–30.Google Scholar
  7. Charleson, D. “Reading Between the Frames: Creating Digital Memories.” The International Journal of New Media, Technology and the Arts 7, no. 4 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coulter-Smith, G. Deconstructing Installation Art: Fine Art and Media Art, 1986–2006. Southampton, UK: CASIAD, 2006.Google Scholar
  9. Elwes, C. Installation and the Moving Image. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  10. Gibson, R. Remembrance and the Moving Image. Melbourne: Australian Centre for the Moving Image, 2002.Google Scholar
  11. Gibson, R. Remembrance + The Moving Image/Editor: Ross Gibson. ACMI Collections. Melbourne, VIC: Australian Centre for the Moving Image, 2013.Google Scholar
  12. Gottschall, J. The Storytelling Animal: How Stories Make Us Human. Boston and New York: Mariner Books Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2013.Google Scholar
  13. Harris, M. P. “Thought, Object and Experience in Film/Video Installation Art.” In Human Creation Between Reality and Illusion, edited by A.-T. Tymieniecka, 185–197. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2005.Google Scholar
  14. Hoffmann, J. Arcades. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
  15. Jenkins, H. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  16. Livingstone, J., and L. Gyarkye. Death to the Flâneur, 2017. Available at https://newrepublic.com/article/141623/death-flaneur. Accessed April 2018.
  17. Norman, D. The Transmedia Design Challenge: Co Creation. ACM Interaction, 2010. Available at https://jnd.org/the_transmedia_design_challenge_co-creation/. Accessed March 28, 2019.
  18. Oren, B. Expanded Spectatorship: Cinema in the Post-proscenium Era. Master of Arts Masters San Francisco State University, San Francisco, 2017 [Online]. Available at https://sfsu-dspace.calstate.edu/bitstream/handle/10211.3/196008/AS362017FILMB66.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed March 2019.
  19. Paôni, D. “Le retour du flâneur.” Art Press (2000): 33–41.Google Scholar
  20. Usher, R., and R. G. Edwards. “Subjects, Networks and Positions: Thinking Educational Guidance Differently.” British Journal of Guidance & Counselling 33, no. 3 (2005): 397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Utterback, C. Designing Systems for Human Interaction, Not Human-Computer Interaction, 2018. Available at http://www.core77.com/reactor/utterback.html. Accessed April 29, 2018.
  22. Viola, B. The Raft, 2004.Google Scholar
  23. Walter, B. The Arcades Project. New York: Belknap Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Arts (Media)Australian Catholic UniversityFitzroyAustralia

Personalised recommendations