Advertisement

Surveying Syrians in Diaspora: Methodological Aspects for Planning and Implementing Longitudinal Studies

  • Judith KohlenbergerEmail author
  • Isabella Buber-Ennser
  • Bernhard Rengs
  • Roland Hosner
Chapter
Part of the European Studies of Population book series (ESPO, volume 20)

Abstract

This chapter provides insights on social surveys among refuge seeking persons carried out in Austria between 2015 and 2017. The methodological approach of the data collection, questionnaire preparation, experiences from the surveys, as well as insights from the field phases from wave 1 and 2 of the surveys are presented. Findings address several key challenges faced by surveys of the highly mobile and vulnerable group of asylum seekers and refugees, including contact and response rates, language barriers, and ethical considerations. In addition, we provide input for planning and implementing longitudinal studies to track the economic, social and cultural integration of Syrian migrants in the labor market and society of the host country. We discuss concrete solutions and recommendations for similar (inter)national, cross-cultural surveys on the Syrian population that recently arrived in Europe.

Keywords

Refugees Asylum seekers Panel survey Methodology Field phase Sampling Research ethics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This chapter was partially funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): Z171-G11. The FIMAS project was kindly funded and supported by the Austrian Ministry of Europe, Integration and Foreign Affairs, the federal states of Tyrol and Salzburg, the city of Vienna, the city of Salzburg, the city of Graz, the city of Wels, the Austrian Association of Cities and Towns, and the labor market service of Upper Austria, Vienna and Tyrol. The FIMAS project was coordinated by ICMPD and co-implemented with the refugee service of the Protestant Church (Diakonie Flüchtlingsdienst) and the Centre for Social Innovation. The FIMAS+INTEGRATION project was implemented in cooperation with the Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies and the Karl-Franzens-University Graz, and realized through grants from by the Jubilee Fund of the Austrian National Bank. Special thanks go to Golschan Khun Jush, ICMPD, for comments on drafts of this chapter.

References

  1. AMS. (2017a). Arbeitsmarktintegration geflüchteter Menschen: Bilanz und Ausblick. Pressekonferenz [Labour market integration of refugees: Balance and outlook. Press conference]. Vienna: Public Employment Service Austria (AMS).Google Scholar
  2. AMS. (2017b). Sonderauswertung zum Bestand anerkannte Flüchtlinge und subsidiär Schutzberechtigte, arbeitslos vorgemerkt oder in Schulung. August 2017 [Special evaluation regarding the stock of refugees and persons under subsidiary protection, registered as unemployed or enrolled in training. August 2017]. Vienna: Public Employment Service Austria (AMS).Google Scholar
  3. Bachleitner, R., Weichbold, M., Aschauer, W., & Pausch, M. (2013). Methodik und Methodologie interkultureller Umfrageforschung: zur Mehrdimensionalität der funktionalen Äquivalenz [Methods and methodology of intercultural survey research: On the multidemensionality of functional equivalence]. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, U. (2004). Der kosmopolitische Blick [The cosmopolitical view]. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  5. Black, R., Koser, K., Munk, K., Atfield, G., D’Onofrio, L., & Tiemoko, R. (2004). Understanding voluntary return. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  6. Bloch, A. (2004). Survey research with refugees. Policy Studies, 25(2), 139–151.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0144287042000262215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bloch, A. (2007). Methodological challenges for national and multi-sited comparative survey research. Journal of Refugee Studies, 20(2), 230–247.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fem002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Block, K., Warr, D., Gibbs, L., & Riggs, E. (2013). Addressing ethical and methodological challenges in research with refugee-background young people: Reflections from the field. Journal of Refugee Studies, 26(1), 69–87.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fes002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. BMEIA. (2015). 50 Punkte Plan zur Integration von Asylberechtigten und subsidiär Schutzberechtigten in Österreich [50 point plan for the integration of persons granted asylum and subsidiary protection in Austria]. Vienna: Austrian Federal Ministry for Europe, Integration and Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
  10. BMI. (2016). Asylstatistik 2015 [Asylum statistics 2015]. Vienna: Austrian Federal Ministry of the Interior.Google Scholar
  11. BMI. (2017). Asylstatistik 2016 [Asylum statistics 2016]. Vienna: Austrian Federal Ministry of the Interior.Google Scholar
  12. BMI. (2018). Asylstatistik 2017 [Asylum statistics 2017]. Vienna: Austrian Federal Ministry of the Interior.Google Scholar
  13. Brekke, J.-P., & Aarset, M. F. (2009). Why Norway? Understanding asylum destinations. Oslo: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  14. Briggs, C. L. (1986). Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brücker, H., Rother, N., & Schupp, J. (eds.). (2016). IAB-BAMF-SOEP-Befragung von Geflüchteten: Überblick und erste Ergebnisse [IAB-BAMF-SOEP-Survey on refugees: Overview and first results]. Research Report 14/2016, Nürnberg: Institute of Employment Research (IAB).Google Scholar
  16. Buber-Ennser, I., Kohlenberger, J., Rengs, B., Al Zalak, Z., Goujon, A., Striessnig, E., Potančoková, M., Gisser, R., Testa, M. R., & Lutz, W. (2016). Human capital, values, and attitudes of persons seeking refuge in Austria in 2015. PLoS ONE, 11(9), e0163481.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen, S.-H. (2011). Power relations between the researcher and the researched: An analysis of native and nonnative ethnographic interviews. Field Methods, 23(2), 119–135.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x10387575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Decker, S. E., Naugle, A. E., Carter-Visscher, R., Bell, K., & Seifert, A. (2011). Ethical issues in research on sensitive topics: Participants’ experiences of distress and benefit. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 6(3), 55–64.  https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2011.6.3.55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eurostat. (2016). Eurostat: Your Key to European Statistics. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/asylum-and-managed-migration/data/database.
  20. Fahie, D. (2014). Doing sensitive research sensitively: Ethical and methodological issues in researching workplace bullying. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13(1), 19–36.  https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691401300108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Faugier, J., & Sargeant, M. (1997). Sampling hard to reach populations. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(4), 790–797.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.00371.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feskens, R., Hox, J., Lensvelt-Mulders, G., & Schmeets, H. (2006). Collecting data among ethnic minorities in an international perspective. Field Methods, 18(3), 284–304.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X06288756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Font, J., & Méndez, M. (Eds.). (2013). Immigrant populations. Methodological challenges and research strategies. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ghattas, H., Sassine, A. J., Seyfert, K., Nord, M., & Sahyoun, N. R. (2015). Prevalence and correlates of food insecurity among Palestinian refugees in Lebanon: Data from a household survey. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0130724.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gilroy, P. (2004). After empire. Melancholia or convivial culture? Oxfordshire: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Habib, R. R., Hojeij, S., Elzein, K., Chaaban, J., & Seyfert, K. (2014). Associations between life conditions and multi-morbidity in marginalized populations: The case of Palestinian refugees. The European Journal of Public Health, 24(5), 727–733.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hall, S. (1992). The question of cultural identity. In S. Hall, D. Held, & A. McGrew (Eds.), Modernity and its futures (pp. 274–316). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London/Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Harkness, J., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Mohler, P. P. (2003). Cross-cultural survey methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Harkness, J., Pennell, B.-E., & Schoua-Glusberg, A. (2004). Survey questionnaire translation and assessment. In S. Presser, J. M. Rothgeb, M. P. Couper, J. T. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin, & E. Singer (Eds.), Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires (pp. 453–473). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hochwarter, C., & Zeglovits, E. (2016). Unbegleitete minderjährige Flüchtlinge in Österreich. Forschungsbericht im Auftrag der Österreichischen Bundesjugendvertretung [Unaccomagnied minor refugees in Austria. Research report on behalf of the Austrian youth association]. Vienna: IFES.Google Scholar
  32. Hosner, R., Vana, I., & Khun Jush, G. (2017) Integrationsmaßnahmen und Arbeitsmarkterfolg von Flüchtlingen und subsidiär Schutzberechtigen in Österreich. Forschungsbericht des FIMAS-Projekts [Integration measures and success on the labor market of refugees and persons granted subsidiary protection in Austria. Research report of the FIMAS-Project]. Vienna: ICMPD.Google Scholar
  33. Hynes, P. (2003). The issue of “trust” or “mistrust” in research with refugees: Choices, caveats and considerations for researchers. Geneva: UNHCR.Google Scholar
  34. ICMPD. (2017). FIMAS Survey 2016/2017, Wave 1. Research Data Set. Vienna.Google Scholar
  35. ICMPD. (2018). FIMAS Survey 2018, Wave 2. Version 1.6. Research Data Set. Vienna.Google Scholar
  36. Jacobsen, K., & Landau, L. B. (2003). The dual imperative in refugee research: Some methodological and ethical considerations in social science research on forced migration. Disasters, 27(3), 185–206.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kalton, G., & Anderson, D. W. (1986). Sampling rare populations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 149(1), 65–82.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2981886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaufmann, K. (2018). Navigating a new life: Syrian refugees and their smartphones in Vienna. Information, Communication & Society, 21(6), 882–898.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1437205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kohlbacher, J., & Schiocchet, L. (2017). From destination to integration: Afghan, Syrian and Iraqi refugees in Vienna. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  40. Kohlbacher, J., Rasuly-Paleczek, G., Hackl, A., & Bauer, S. (2017). Wertehaltungen und Erwartungen von Flüchtlingen in Österreich. Endbericht [Attitudes and expectations of refugees in Austria. Final report]. Vienna: Federal Ministry for Europe, Integration and Foreign Affairs (BMEIA).Google Scholar
  41. Kohlenberger, J., Buber-Ennser, I., Rengs, B., & Al Zalak, Z. (2017). A social survey on asylum seekers in and around Vienna in fall 2015: Methodological approach and field observations. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 36(4), 90–109.  https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdx012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. MacDonald, A. (2015). Review of selected surveys of refugee populations, 2000–2014. Paper Commissioned by the UNHCR, presented at the International Conference on Refugee Statistics, 7–9 October. Antalya, Turkey.Google Scholar
  44. Maitland, C., & Xu, Y. (2015). A social informatics analysis of refugee mobile phone use: A case study of Za’atari Syrian refugee camp. Paper presented at the TPRC 43: The 43rd Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy Paper.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2588300.
  45. McMichael, C., Nunn, C., Gifford, S. M., & Correa-Velez, I. (2015). Studying refugee settlement through longitudinal research: Methodological and ethical insights from the Good Starts Study. Journal of Refugee Studies, 28(2), 238–257.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feu017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mendola, D., Busetta, A., Cetorelli, V., & Wilson, B. (2017). Asylum seekers and refugees in informal settlements in Italy: A multidimensional vulnerability assessment. Paper presented at the Euro-Mediterranean Migration Congress (EXOMED), April 2017, University of Alcalá, Madrid.Google Scholar
  47. MLD. (2008). Muslim Life in Germany. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5244 Data file Version 1.0.0.  https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12023.
  48. Myrberg, G. (2013). Surveying migrants and migrants’ associations in Stockholm. In J. Font & M. Méndez (Eds.), Surveying ethnic minorities and immigrant populations: Methodological challenges and research strategies (pp. 131–146). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Naroll, R. (1962). Data quality control: A new research technique. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  50. OECD. (2016). Making integration work: Refugees and others in need of protection. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  51. Pasick, R. J., Stewart, S. L., Bird, J. A., & D’Onofrio, C. N. (2001). Quality of data in multiethnic health surveys. Public Health Reports, 116(Suppl 1), 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Polzer Ngwato, T. (2013). Collecting data on migrants through service provider NGOs: Towards data use and advocacy. Journal of Refugee Studies, 26(1), 144–154.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fes034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Renzetti, C. M., & Lee, R. M. (1993). Researching sensitive topics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Ruiz, I., Siegel, M., & Vargas-Silva, C. (2015). Forced up or down? The impact of forced migration on social status. Journal of Refugee Studies, 28(2), 183–201.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feu035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ruzek, J. I., & Zatzick, D. F. (2000). Ethical considerations in research participation among acutely injured trauma survivors: An empirical investigation. General Hospital Psychiatry, 22(1), 27–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-8343(99)00041-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sirin, S. R., & Rogers-Sirin, L. (2015). The educational and mental health needs of Syrian refugee children. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  57. Strand, A., Akbari, A., Wimpelmann Chaudhary, T., Berg Harpviken, K., Sarwari, A., & Suhrke, A. (2008). Return in dignity, return to what? Review of the voluntary return programme to Afghanistan. Bergen: Christian Michelsen Institute.Google Scholar
  58. Sulaiman-Hill, C., & Thompson, S. C. (2011). Sampling challenges in a study examining refugee resettlement. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 11(1), 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-698x-11-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Syrian Central Bureau of Statistics. (2016). Manpower survey 2010. http://www.cbssyr.sy/work/2010/Questionnaire2010-semi2.htm
  60. Tangermann, J., & Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, P. (2018). Unbegleitete Minderjährige in Deutschland. Herausforderungen und Maßnahmen nach der Klärung des aufenthaltsrechtlichen Status. Studie der deutschen nationalen Kontaktstelle für das Europäische Migrationsnetzwerk (EMN) [Unaccompagnied minors in Germany. Challenges and measures after clarifying residence status. Study of the German national contact centre for the Euopean migration network (EMN)]. Nürnberg: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge.Google Scholar
  61. UNHCR. (2013). A new beginning: Refugee integration in Europe. In The UN Refugee Agency. Geneva.Google Scholar
  62. UNHCR. (2015). Syrian refugee arrivals in Greece, April–September 2015, preliminary questionnaire findings. Geneva: UNHCR.Google Scholar
  63. van der Velden, P. G., Bosmans, M. W. G., & Scherpenzeel, A. C. (2013). The burden of research on trauma for respondents: A prospective and comparative study on respondents evaluations and predictors. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e77266.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701599465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vertovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vigneswaran, D., & Quirk, J. (2013). Quantitative methodological dilemmas in urban refugee research: A case study of Johannesburg. Journal of Refugee Studies, 26(1), 110–116.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fes035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wall, M., Otis Campbell, M., & Janbek, D. (2015). Syrian refugees and information precarity. New Media & Society.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815591967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Warfa, N., Curtis, S., Watters, C., Carswell, K., Ingleby, D., & Bhui, K. (2012). Migration experiences, employment status and psychological distress among Somali immigrants: A mixed-method international study. BMC Public Health, 12(749), 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wilson, B., Busetta, A., Cetorelli, V., & Mendola, D. (2018, April). The vulnerability of asylum seekers and refugees in Italy. Paper presented at the Population Association of America (PAA), Denver.Google Scholar
  70. Winchatz, M. R. (2006). Fieldworker or foreigner? Ethnographic interviewing in nonnative languages. Field Methods, 18(1), 83–97.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith Kohlenberger
    • 1
    Email author
  • Isabella Buber-Ennser
    • 2
  • Bernhard Rengs
    • 2
  • Roland Hosner
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Social Policy, Vienna University of Economics and BusinessViennaAustria
  2. 2.Wittgenstein Centre (IIASA, VID/ÖAW, WU), Vienna Institute of Demography/Austrian Academy of SciencesViennaAustria
  3. 3.International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD)ViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations