Advertisement

Envisioning a Solution for a Runaway Object: A Formative Intervention in a Child Labor Combat Network

  • Sandra DonatelliEmail author
  • Rodolfo Andrade de Gouveia Vilela
  • Marco Antonio Pereira Querol
  • Sandra Francisca Bezerra Gemma
Chapter

Abstract

Technological changes and increasing international competition in jewelry and semiprecious jewelry manufacturing, which took place in recent decades, led manufacturers in Limeira, São Paulo, Brazil, to implement outsourcing strategies which promote child exploitation. Despite the efforts of regulatory agencies, child labor could not be eradicated to this day. As a fact, the pattern of spread of child labor makes it uncontrollable and thus what Engeström calls a runaway object. Such objects pose a considerable challenge, because they lack a center for control, but combat depends on the cooperation of various interdependent activities. The aim of the present chapter is to analyze Change Laboratory (CL) sessions to describe the learning trajectory of Limeira Municipal Committee for Eradication of Child Labor and Adolescent Work Protection (COMETIL). Ever since its creation, COMETIL met difficulties to develop an interinstitutional network of public services targeting child and adolescent protection. Intervention served to consolidate COMETIL and define a viable object within such diffuse and complex set of activities. For analysis, we had resource to notions such as runaway object, relational agency, and infrastructure. We conclude that the object develops as COMETIL actors’ agency escapes the rigid structure of the various institutions to enable the provision of assistance to families with children who work.

Keywords

Domestic labor 

References

  1. Bødker, S., Dindler, C., & Iversen, O. S. (2017). Tying knots: Participatory infrastructuring at work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 26(1–2), 245–273.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9268-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
  3. Engeström, Y. (2006). Development, movement and agency: Breaking away into mycorrhizae activities. In K. Yamazumi (Ed.), Building activity theory in practice: Toward the next generation (pp. 1–43). Osaka: Center for Human Activity Theory, Kansai University.Google Scholar
  4. Engeström, Y. (2009). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. Gutierrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 303–328). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. New York: Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
  6. Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J., & Poikela, R. (1996). The change laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 1(2), 10–17.Google Scholar
  7. Favret-Saada, J. (1990). Être affecté. Gradhiva: revue d’histoire et d’archives de l’anthropologie, 8, 3–9.Google Scholar
  8. Ferreira, M. A. L. (2005). Estudo de riscos à saúde do trabalhador e ao meio ambiente na produção de joias e bijuterias de Limeira–SP [dissertation]. Piracicaba: UNIMEP, Portuguese.Google Scholar
  9. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Haapasaari, A., Engeström, Y., & Kerosuo, H. (2016). The emergence of learners’ transformative agency in a Change Laboratory intervention. Journal of Education and Work, 29(2), 232–262.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2014.900168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lacorte, L. E. C. (2012). A construção de políticas públicas em rede intersetorial para a erradicação do trabalho infantil em Limeira-SP [dissertation]. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo, Portuguese. doi: https://doi.org/10.11606/D.6.2012.tde-10092012-162500.
  12. Lacorte, L. E. C., Vilela, R. A. G., Silva, R. C., Chiesa, A. M., Tulio, E. S., Franco, R. R., et al. (2013). Os nós da rede para erradicação do trabalho infanto-juvenil na produção de joias e bijuterias em Limeira – SP. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional, 38(128), 199–215.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0303-76572013000200009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Limeira, (2016). Decreto n° 399 de 22 de dezembro de 2016. Institui a comissão municipal de erradicação do trabalho infantil e proteção do adolescente no município de Limeira. Jornal Oficial do Município. 28 Dez 2016.Google Scholar
  14. Peixoto, M. A. (2014). Estrutura e agência em Anthony Giddens: uma análise crítica do estruturacionismo. Revista Sociologia em Rede, 4(4), 93–106.Google Scholar
  15. Rasmussen, M. B., Gade, A. N., & Rasmun Lund, J. (2017). A knotworking guideline for building projects: Bridging the gap between participants. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 7(6 (Part 4)), 24–40.  https://doi.org/10.9790/9622-0706042440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134.  https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vilela, R. A. G., & Ferreira, M. A. L. (2008). Nem tudo brilha na produção de joias de Limeira – SP. Production, 18(1), 183–194.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65132008000100014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Virkkunen, J., & Newnham, D. S. (2013). The Change Laboratory: A tool for collaborative development of work and education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra Donatelli
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rodolfo Andrade de Gouveia Vilela
    • 2
  • Marco Antonio Pereira Querol
    • 3
  • Sandra Francisca Bezerra Gemma
    • 4
  1. 1.Occupational Safety and Medicine Foundation Jorge Duprat Figueiredo – FUNDACENTROSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Environmental HealthSchool of Public Health, University of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Agronomic EngineeringFederal University of SergipeSão CristóvãoBrazil
  4. 4.School of Applied SciencesUniversity of CampinasLimeiraBrazil

Personalised recommendations