PARIESA: Practice and Research in Enactive Sonic Art

  • Lauren HayesEmail author
Part of the Springer Series on Bio- and Neurosystems book series (SSBN, volume 10)


This research presents an overview of the extended applications of enactive and embodied music cognition within creative music and sonic art practice. Digital and haptic technologies, improvisation, and performance have been used to explore a range of interdisciplinary collaborations from pedagogy to health and wellbeing, as well as music perception.


Music Haptics Performance Digital instrument design Sound Touch 



Images courtesy of Craig Jackson and Jason Thrasher.

Supplementary material

Media Example 1

Excerpts from audio-haptic installation, Skin Music, 2012 (MOV 42744 kb)

476737_1_En_7_MOESM2_ESM.mp4 (28.7 mb)
Media Example 2Figurine-Operated String, 2012 (for piano and live electronics) (MP4 29419 kb)
Media Example 3

Improvising with the hybrid analogue-digital performance system (MP4 82148 kb)


  1. 1.
    Blacking, J.: How Musical Is Man?. University of Washington Press, Seattle (1974)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cadoz, C.: Instrumental gesture and musical composition. In: Proceedings of the 1988 International Computer Music Conference, San Francisco (1988)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davidson, P.W.: Haptic perception. In: S. of Pediatric Psychology (ed.) J. Pediatr. Psychol. 1(3), 21–25. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1976)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    DeNora, T.: Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Emmerson, S.: Music imagination technology. In: Proceedings of the 2011 International Computer Music Conference, Huddersfield (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferguson, J.R.: Imagined agency: technology, unpredictability, and ambiguity. Contemp. Music Rev. 32(2–3), 135–149. Taylor & Francis, London (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ferrari, P.F., Rizzolatti, G.: Mirror neuron research: the past and the future. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 369(1644), 20130169 (2014).
  8. 8.
    Gallagher, S., Hutto, D.D., Slaby, J., Cole, J.: The brain as part of an enactive system. Behav. Brain Sci. 36(4), 421–422 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glennie, E.: Hearing essay. (1993). Accessed 23 Nov 2018
  10. 10.
    Grote, F., Andersen, K., Knees, P.: Collaborating with intelligent machines: interfaces for creative sound. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Seoul, 18–23 April 2015 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hayes, L.: Practice and research in enactive sonic art. (n.d.). Accessed 23 Dec 2018
  12. 12.
    Hayes, L.: Vibrotactile feedback-assisted performance. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Oslo (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hayes, L., Michalakos, C.: Imposing a networked vibrotactile communication system for improvisational suggestion. Organ. Sound 17(1), 36–44. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hayes, L.: Haptic augmentation of the hybrid piano. Contemp. Music Rev. 32(5), 499–509. Taylor & Francis, London (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hayes, L.: Skin Music (2012): an Audio-haptic composition for ears and body. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. Glasgow, 2012 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hayes, L.: Enacting musical worlds: common approaches to using NIMEs within both performance and person-centred arts practices. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Baton Rouge (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hayes, L., Rajko, J.: Towards an aesthetics of touch. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing. ACM, London (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hayes, L.: Live electronic music performance: embodied and enactive approaches. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Movement Computing. ACM, Genoa (2018).
  19. 19.
    Hayman, G.: Mirror neurons, Husserl, and enactivism: an analysis of phenomenological compatibility. Perspectives 6(1), 13–23 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ingold, T.: The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. Routledge, London (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Loaiza, J.M.: From enactive concern to care in social life: towards an enactive anthropology of caring. Adapt. Behav. (2018).
  22. 22.
    Matyja, J.R., Schiavio, A.: Enactive music cognition: background and research themes. Constr. Found. 8(3), 351–357 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Merleau-Ponty, M.: Phénoménologie de la perception (1945). English edition: Merleau-Ponty, M.: Phenomenology of Perception (trans: Smith, C.). Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1962)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Molnar-Szakacs, I., Overy, K.: Music and mirror neurons: from motion to’e’motion. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 1(3), 235–241 (2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    O’Modhrain, S.: Playing by feel: incorporating haptic feedback into computer-based musical instruments. Ph.D. Dissertation. (2001). Accessed 23 Dec 2018
  26. 26.
    Paterson, M.: The Senses of Touch: Haptics, Affects and Technologies. Berg, Oxford (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rebelo, P., Coyne, R.: Resisting the smooth: time-based interactive media in the production of distressed space. In: Digital Design: 21st eCAADe Conference (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roebuck, J.: I am a deaf opera singer. (2007). Accessed 1 Dec 2018
  29. 29.
    Small, C.: Musicking: The Meanings of Performing and Listening. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., Rosch, E.: The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arts, Media and Engineering, Arizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations