Skip to main content

Orthogonal Bandit Learning for Portfolio Selection Under Cardinality Constraint

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2019 (ICCSA 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11621))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we address the portfolio selection problem and solve it by means of a machine learning approach. More precisely, we study portfolio optimization under cardinality constraint, which limits the number of assets in a portfolio. This problem is known to be NP-hard and, consequently, difficult to solve for some settings of the cardinality parameter. In order to solve the problem, we introduce a hybrid approach that combines effectively an existing bandit learning algorithm with a kernel search heuristic. The bandit learning algorithm is used for conducting online portfolio selections and the kernel search manages the cardinality constraint. In order to investigate the performance of our algorithm, we carried out computational experiments on real-world market data sets. According to the numerical results, we observe that, despite the presence of cardinality constraint, our hybrid algorithm shows good performance in solving the test instances in reasonable computation time and, in many cases, the algorithm provides portfolios with higher cumulative wealth than those obtained through the existing bandit learning algorithm, which is applied on classical portfolio selection problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bartholomew-Biggs, M.C.: Nonlinear Optimization with Financial Applications, 1st edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Berry, D.A., Fristedt, B.: Bandit Problems: Sequential Allocaton of Experiments. University of Minnesota: Chapman and Hall Ltd., London (1985)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, W., Wang, Y., Yuan, Y.: Combinatorial multi-armed bandit: general framework and applications. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 151–159 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fan, J., Fan, Y., Lv, J.: High dimensional covariance matrix estimation using a factor model (2007). http://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0701124v1

  5. Fernández, A., Gómez, S.: Portfolio selection using neural networks. Comput. Oper. Res. 34, 1177–1191 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Guastaroba, G., Speranza, M.G.: Kernel search: an application to the index tracking problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 217(1), 54–68 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gulpinar, N., Le Thi, H.A., Moeini, M.: Robust investment strategies with discrete asset choice constraints using DC programming. Optimization 59(1), 45–62 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffman, M.D., Brochu, E., de Freitas, N.: Portfolio allocation for bayesian optimization. In: The Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 327–336 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jobst, N., Horniman, M., Lucas, C., Mitra, G.: Computational aspects of alternative portfolio selection models in the presence of discrete asset choice constraints. Quant. Finance 1, 1–13 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Konno, H., Yamamoto, R.: Global optimization versus integer programming in portfolio optimization under nonconvex transaction costs. J. Glob. Optim. 32, 207–219 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lai, T.L., Robbins, H.: Asymptotically efficient adaptive allocation rules. Adv. Appl. Math. 6(1), 4–22 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Le Thi, H.A., Moeini, M.: Portfolio selection under buy-in threshold constraints using DC programming and DCA. In: International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (IEEE/SSSM 2006), pp. 296–300 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Le Thi, H.A., Moeini, M., Pham Dinh, T.: Portfolio selection under downside risk measures and cardinality constraints based on DC programming and DCA. Comput. Manag. Sci. 6(4), 477–501 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Le Thi, H.A., Moeini, M., Pham Dinh, T.: DC programming approach for portfolio optimization under step increasing transaction costs. Optimization 58(3), 267–289 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Le Thi, H.A., Moeini, M.: Long-short portfolio optimization under cardinality constraints by difference of convex functions algorithm. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 161(1), 199–224 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Markowitz, H.M.: Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7(1), 77–91 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Markowitz, H.M.: Portfolio Selection. Wiley, New York (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Meucci, A.: Risk and Asset Allocation. Springer, Dordrecht (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Moeini, M., Wendt, O., Krumrey, L.: Portfolio optimization by means of a \(\chi \)-armed bandit algorithm. In: Nguyen, N.T., Trawiński, B., Fujita, H., Hong, T.-P. (eds.) ACIIDS 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9622, pp. 620–629. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49390-8_60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Robbins, H.: Some aspects of the sequential design of experiments. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 58, 527–535 (1952)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Shen, W., Wang, J., Jiang, Y.-G., Zha, H.: Portfolio choices with orthogonal bandit learning. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2015), pp. 974–980 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thompson, W.R.: On the likelihood that one unknown probability exceeds another in view of the evidence of two samples. Biometrika 25, 275–294 (1933)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank the Chair of Business Information Systems and Operations Research (BISOR) at the Technische Universität Kaiserslautern (Germany), where the paper was written, for the financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdi Moeini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Moeini, M. (2019). Orthogonal Bandit Learning for Portfolio Selection Under Cardinality Constraint. In: Misra, S., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2019. ICCSA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11621. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24302-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24302-9_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24301-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24302-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics