Skip to main content

Follow-Up Consultations: Why?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Post-Intensive Care Syndrome

Part of the book series: Lessons from the ICU ((LEICU))

Abstract

The development of intensive care unit follow-up clinics has provided an opportunity to truly understand the complexities of recovering from critical illness from the patient perspective; they have shown us, as clinicians and researchers, that successful discharge from ICU is just the start of the journey of recovery for many patients. This chapter explores the history of ICU follow-up, the evidence supporting (and refuting) the potential benefits, and the patient perspective of ICU follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Griffiths R, Jones C. ABC of intensive care: recovery from intensive care. Clinical review. BMJ. 1999;219:427–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Broomhead LR, Brett SJ. Clinical review: intensive care follow-up – what has it told us? Review. Crit Care. 2002;6(5):411–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Puthucheary ZA, Rawal JR, McPhail M, Connolly B, Ratnayake G, et al. Acute skeletal muscle wasting in critical illness. JAMA. 2013;310(15):1591–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaukonen K-M, Bailey M, Suzuki S. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patient in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2012. JAMA. 2014;311(13):1308–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Herridge MS, Cheung AM, Tansey CM, Matte-Martyn A, Diaz-Granados N, Al-Saidi F, et al. One year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(8):683–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheung AM, Tansey CM, Tomlinson G, Diaz-Granados N, Matté A, Barr A. Two-year outcomes, health care use, and costs of survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174(5):538–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Herridge MS, Tansey CM, Matté A, Tomlinson G, Diaz-Granados N, et al. Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1293–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramsey P, Huby G, Rattray J, Salisbury LG, Walsh TS, Kean S. A longitudinal qualitative exploration of healthcare and informal support needs among survivors of critical illness: the RELINQUISH protocol. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Griffiths J, Hatch RA, Bishop J, Morgan K, Jenkinson C, Cuthbertson B, et al. An exploration of social and economic outcome and associated health related quality of life after critical illness in general intensive care unit survivors: a 12-month follow-up study. Crit Care. 2013;17:R100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Quinlan J, Gager M, Fawcett D. Sexual dysfunction after intensive care. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87:348.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pandharipande P, Girard TD, Jackson JC, Morandi A, Thompson JL, et al. Long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1306–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Parker AM, Sricharoenchai T, Raparla S, Schneck KW, Bienvenu J, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder in critical illness survivors: a metaanalysis. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(5):1121–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carver CS, Scheier MF. Scaling back goals and recalibration if the affect systems are processes in normal adaptive self-regulation: understanding ‘response shift’ phenomona. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:1715–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Löf L, Ahlström G. Severely ill ICU patients recall of factual events and unreal experiences of hospital admission and ICU stay – 3 an 12 months after discharge. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2006;22(3):154–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hefferon K, Grealy M, Mutrie N. Post-traumatic growth and life threatening physical illness: a systematic review of the qualitative literature. Br J Health Psychol. 2009;14(2):343–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Egerod I, Risom SS, Thomson T, Storli SL, Eskerud RS, et al. ICU-recovery in Scandinavia: a comparative study of intensive care follow-up in Denmark. Norway and Sweden: Intensive and Critical Care Nursing; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Griffiths JA, Barber VS, Cuthbertson BH, Young JD. A national survey of intensive care follow up clinics. Anesthesia. 2006;61(10):950–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Great Britain. Rehabilitation after critical illness Great Britain. Clinical Guideline 83. Available at: www.nice.org.uk; 2009.

  19. National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. Rehabilitation after critical illness in adults. Quality standard [QS158] Published date: Sept 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Connolly B, Douiri A, Steier J, Moxham J, Denehy L, Hart N. A UK survey of rehabilitation following critical illness: implementation of NICE Clinical Guidance 83 (CG83) following hospital discharge. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e004963.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Jensen JF, Thomsen T, Overgaard D, Bestle MH, Christensen D, Egerod I. Impact of follow-up consultations for ICU survivors on post-ICU syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:763–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cuthbertson BH, Rattray J, Campbell MK, Gager M, Roughton S, Smith A, et al. The PRaCTiCal study of nurse led, intensive care follow-up programmes for improving long term outcomes from critical illness: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2009;339:b3723.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Batterham AM, Bonner S, Wright J, Howell SJ, Hugill K, Danjoux G. Effect of supervised aerobic exercise rehabilitation on physical fitness and quality of life in survivors of critical illness: an exploratory minimized controlled trial (PIX study). Br J Anesth. 2014;113(1):130–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Walsh TS, Salisbury LG, Merriweather J, Boyd JA, Griffith DM, Huby G, et al. Increased hospital-based physical rehabilitation and information provision after intensive care unit discharge. The RECOVER randomized controlled clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 175(6):901–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mehlhorn J, Freytag A, Schmidt K, Brunkhorst FM, Graf J, Troitzsch U, et al. Rehabilitation interventions for post intensive care syndrome: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(5):1263–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ramsey P, Huby G, Merriweather J, Salibury L, Rattray J, Griffith D, et al. Patient and carer experience of hospital-based rehabilitation from intensive care to hospital discharge: mixed methods process evaluation of the RECOVER randomized controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e012041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Walker W, Wright J, Danjoux G, Howell SJ, Martin D, Bonner S. Project post intensive care eXercise (PIX): a qualitative exploration of intensive care unit survivors’ perceptions of quality of life post-discharge and experience of exercise rehabilitation. J Intensive Care Soc. 2015;16(1):37–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Field K, Prinjha S, Rowan K. ‘One amongst many’: a qualitative analysis of intensive care unit patients’ experiences of transferring to the general ward. Crit Care. 2008;12(1):R21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Jones C, Skirrow P, Griffiths R, Humphris G, Ingleby S, et al. Rehabilitation after critical illness: a randomised controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(10):2456–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Griffiths RD, Jones C. Seven lessons from 20 years of follow-up of intensive care unit survivors. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007;13:508–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Griffiths J, Fortune G, Barber V, Young JD. The prevalence of post traumatic stress disorder in survivors of ICU treatment: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(9):1506–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wade DM, Howell DC, Weinman JA, Hardy R, Mythens MG, Brewin CR. Investigating risk factors for psychological morbidity three months after intensive care: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2012;16:R192.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Royal College of Physicians. National clinical guideline for stroke. 5th ed. 2016. Available at: www.strokeaudit.org.

  34. Hopkinson N, Englebretsen C, Cooley N, Kennie K, Lim M, Woodcock T, et al. Designing and implementing a COPD discharge care bundle. Thorax. 2011;67(1):90–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lasiter S. Critical care follow-up clinics: a scoping review of interventions and outcomes. Clin Nurse Spec. 2016;30(4):227–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Haraldsson L, Christensson L, Conlon L, Henricson M. The experiences of ICU patients during follow up sessions – a qualitative study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2015;31:223–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Van der Schaaf M, Bakhshi-raiez F, Van der Steen M, Dongelmans DA, De Keizer NF. Recommendation for intensive care follow –up clinics; report from a survey of Dutch intensive cares. Minerva Anesthesiol. 2015;81(2):135–44.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Williams TA, Leslie GD. Beyond the walls: a review of ICU clinics and their impact on patient outcomes after leaving ICU. Aust Crit Care. 2008;21:6–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Prinijha A, Field K, Rowan K. What patients think about ICU follow up services: a qualitative study. Crit Care. 2009;13(2):R46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Haraldsson L, Christensson L, Conlon L, Henricson M. The experience of ICU patients during follow-up sessions – a qualitative study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2015;31(4):223–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schwartz CE, Andresen EM, Nosek MA, Krahn GL, the RRTC Expert Panel on Health Status Management. Response shift theory: important implications for measuring quality of life in people with disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:529–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evelyn J. Corner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Corner, E.J., Brett, S.J. (2020). Follow-Up Consultations: Why?. In: Preiser, JC., Herridge, M., Azoulay, E. (eds) Post-Intensive Care Syndrome. Lessons from the ICU. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24250-3_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24250-3_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24249-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24250-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics