At this time in medical history, we often see the complications of industrial silicone injections in patients who have undergone this procedure to augment the size of their breasts. This practice, long considered outside the ethical standards of good medical practice, commonly leads to adverse health effects and the physical and psychological trauma associated with them.
The primary objective of this chapter is to describe how the current authors have elected, in selected cases, to perform a conservative mastectomy, using an inverted “T” mammary-reduction pattern, which allows for immediate reconstruction with implants in ptotic and large breasts. Generally, those who undergo this procedure are young patients who, seeking to enhance their breast size, end up with significant future morbidity as a result of the multiple intramammary and subdermal cysts that are generated which, eventually, not only can fistulize but also migrate.
Concomitant with these cutaneous alterations, breast ptosis sometimes occurs that ranges from moderate to large, as a consequence of the increased weight that is generated. Notably, this cutaneous surplus in the lower pole will be the flap of skin that we will use in our procedure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Armstrong RW, Berkowitz RL, Bolding F. Infection following breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1989;23(4):284–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Barton FE Jr, English JM, Kingsley WB, Fietz M. Glandular excision in total glandular mastectomy and modified radical mastectomy: a comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;88(3):389–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Carlson GW. Skin sparing mastectomy: anatomic and technical considerations. Am Surg. 1996;62(2):151–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Deck KB, Kern WH. Local recurrence of breast cancer. Arch Surg. 1976;111(4):323–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Dickson MG, Sharpe DT. The complications of tissue expansion in breast reconstruction: a review of 75 cases. Br J Plast Surg. 1987;40(6):629–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Donegan WL, Perez-Mesa CM, Watson FR. A biostatistical study of locally recurrent breast carcinoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1966;122(3):529–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Dowden RV. Selection criteria for successful immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;88(4):628–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Gilliland MD, Barton RM, Copeland EM. The implications of local recurrence of breast cancer as the first site of therapeutic failure. Ann Surg. 1983;197(3):284–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Hartrampf CR Jr, Bennett GK. Autogenous tissue reconstruction in the mastectomy patient. A critical review of 300 patients. Ann Surg. 1987;205(5):508–19.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Kroll SS, Ames F, Singletary SE, Schusterman MA. The oncologic risks of skin preservation at mastectomy when combined with immediate reconstruction of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991;172(1):17–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Kroll SS, Baldwin B. A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90(3):455–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Kroll SS, Netscher DT. Complications of TRAM flap breast reconstruction in obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;84(6):886–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Lipshy KA, Neifeld JP, Boyle RM, Frable WJ, et al. Complications of mastectomy and their relationship to biopsy technique. Ann Surg Oncol. 1996;3(3):290–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
McCraw JB, Horton CE, Grossman JA, Kaplan I, McMellin A. An early appraisal of the methods of tissue expansion and the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap in reconstruction of the breast following mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 1987;18(2):93–113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Moore TS, Farrell LD. Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: long-term results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89(4):666–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Nava MB, Cortinovis U, Ottolengui J, et al. Skin reducing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 118(3): 603–10; Russell IS, Collins JP, Holmes AD, Smith JA. The use of tissue expansion for immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Med J Aust. 1990;152(12):632–5.Google Scholar
Scheflan M, Dinner MI. The transverse abdominal island flap: part I. indications, contraindications, results, and complications. Ann Plast Surg. 1983;10(1):24–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Schuster RH, Rotter S, Boonn W, Efron G. The use of tissue expanders in immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy for cancer. Br J Plast Surg. 1990;43(4):413–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Slavin SA, Colen SR. Sixty consecutive breast reconstructions with the inflatable expander: a critical appraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86(5):910–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Slavin SA, Love SM, Sadowsky NL. Reconstruction of the radiated partial mastectomy defect with autogenous tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90(5):854–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Toth BA, Lappert P. Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87(6):1048–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Vinton AL, Traverso LW, Jolly PC. Wound complications after modified radical mastectomy compared with tylectomy with axillary lymph node dissection. Am J Surg. 1991;161(5):584–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Ward J, Cohen IK, Knaysi GA, Brown PW. Immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;80(4):559–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Watterson PA, Bostwick J 3rd, Hester TR Jr, Bried JT, Taylor GI. TRAM flap anatomy correlated with a 10 – year clinical experience with 556 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;95(7):1185–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Schenone GE. Siliconomas Mamarios por Inyección: Clínica, Diagnóstico y Tratamiento. Buenos Aires: Ed Journal; 2017. p. 101–105.Google Scholar