Advertisement

Approaches for Remediation of Sites Contaminated with Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons

  • Saranya Kuppusamy
  • Naga Raju Maddela
  • Mallavarapu Megharaj
  • Kadiyala Venkateswarlu
Chapter

Abstract

For more than a decade, the primary focus of environmental experts has been to adopt risk-based management approaches to clean-up the total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs)-polluted sites that pose potentially destructive ecological consequences. This attention led to the development of several physico-chemical, thermal, and biological technologies that are widely implementable. Established remedial options available for treating TPHs-contaminated sites are dig and dump, soil washing, soil vapor extraction, incineration, thermal desorption, natural attenuation, landfarming, slurry bioreactors, composting, bioaugmentation, biostimulation, biopiling, bioventing, and phytoremediation. Integrating physico-chemical, thermal, and/or biological technologies is also practiced for better clean-up of TPHs-contaminated environments. Bioelectrochemical system, nanoremediation, electrokinetic remediation, genetic engineering, and ultrasound technology-assisted remediation are still at the development stage. Though several treatment methods to remediate TPHs-polluted sites currently exist, a comprehensive overview of all the available remediation technologies to date is not available and is necessary so that the right technology for field-level success is chosen. Hence, this chapter presents a brief overview of all the traditional and newly emerging technologies for TPHs remediation.

Keywords

Bioremediation of TPHs Ex situ technologies for TPHs In situ technologies for TPHs Nanoremediation Phytoremediation Risk-based remediation 

References

  1. Abioye OP, Agamuthu P, Abdul Aziz AR (2012) Biodegradation of used motor oil in soil using organic waste amendments. Biotechnol Res Int 2012:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acevedo F, Pizzul L, del Pilar CM, Cuevas R, Diez MC (2011) Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by the Chilean white-rot fungus Anthracophyllum discolor. J Hazard Mater 185:212–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acharya P, Ives P (1994) Incineration at Bayou Bonfouca remediation project. Waste Manag 14:13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adewuyi YG (2001) Sonochemistry: environmental science and engineering applications. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:4681–4715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aelion CM, Kirtland BC (2000) Physical versus biological hydrocarbon removal during air sparging and soil vapor extraction. Environ Sci Technol 34:3167–3173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Agarry SE, Ogunleye OO (2012) Box-Behnken design application to study enhanced bioremediation of soil artificially contaminated with spent engine oil using biostimulation strategy. Int J Energy Environ Eng 3:31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Agarry SE, Owabor CN, Yusuf RO (2010) Bioremediation of soil artificially contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbon oil mixtures: evaluation of the use of animal manure and chemical fertilizer. Biorem J 14:189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ahmed F, Fakhruddin ANM (2018) A review on environmental contamination of petroleum hydrocarbons and its biodegradation. Int J Environ Sci Nat Resour 11:1–7Google Scholar
  9. Al-Baldawi IA, Abdullah SRS, Anuar N, Suja F, Mushrifah I (2015) Phytodegradation of total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) in diesel-contaminated water using Scirpus grossus. Ecol Eng 74:463–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Al-Kindi S, Abed RM (2016) Effect of biostimulation using sewage sludge, soybean meal, and wheat straw on oil degradation and bacterial community composition in a contaminated desert soil. Front Microbiol 7:240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Alleman BC, Leeson A (1999) Bioreactor and ex situ biological treatment technologies – File no. BATT-0140/XAB. Battelle, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  12. Al-Maamari RS, Hirayama A, Sueyoshi MN, Abdalla OAE, Al-Bemani AS, Islam MR (2009) The application of air-sparging, soil vapor extraction and pump and treat for remediation of a diesel-contaminated fractured formation. Energy Source 31:911–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Alvarez PJJ, Illman WA (2006) Bioremediation and natural attenuation of groundwater contaminants: process fundamentals and mathematical models. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  14. Anthony EJ, Wang J (2006) Pilot plant investigations of thermal remediation of tar-contaminated soil and oil-contaminated gravel. Fuel 85:443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. April TM, Foght JM, Currah RS (2000) Hydrocarbon- degrading filamentous fungi isolated from flare pit soils in northern and western Canada. Can J Microbiol 46:38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Baker RS, Tarmasiewicz D, Bierschenk JM, King J, Landler T, Sheppard D (2007) Completion of in situ thermal remediation of PAHs, PCP and dioxins at a former wood treatment facility. In: International conference on incineration and thermal treatment technologies, Orlando, pp 14–18Google Scholar
  17. Barac T, Taghavi S, Borremans B, Provoost A, Oeyen L, Colpaert JV, Vangronsveld J, van der Lelie D (2004) Engineered endophytic bacteria improve phytoremediation of water-soluble, volatile, organic pollutants. Nat Biotechnol 22:583–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Barnes DL, Laderach SR, Showers C (2002) Treatment of petroleum-contaminated soil in cold, wet, remote regions. USDA Forest Service, MissoulaGoogle Scholar
  19. Bento FM, Camargo FA, Okeke BC, Frankenberger WT (2005) Comparative bioremediation of soils contaminated with diesel oil by natural attenuation, biostimulation and bioaugmentation. Bioresour Technol 96:1049–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bezza FA, Chirwa EMN (2016) Biosurfactant-enhanced bioremediation of aged polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in creosote contaminated soil. Chemosphere 144:635–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Blyth W, Shahsavari E, Morrison PD, Ball AS (2015) Biosurfactant from red ash trees enhances the bioremediation of PAH contaminated soil at a former gasworks site. J Environ Manage 162:30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bonilla A, Cuesta P, Zubiaga R, Saenz de Baranda M, Iglesias J (2000) Electrokinetic remediation of contaminated soils using acid and alkaline media: laboratory experiments with synthetic soils. Land Contam Reclam 8:33–39Google Scholar
  23. Bossert I, Bartha R (1984) The fate of petroleum in soil ecosystem. In: Petroleum microbiology. Macmillan, New York, pp 435–473Google Scholar
  24. Bourdel G, Roy-Bolduc A, St-Arnaud M, Hijri M (2016) Concentration of petroleum-hydrocarbon contamination shapes fungal endophytic community structure in plant roots. Front Microbiol 7:685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Brown DM, Okoro S, van Gils J, van Spanning R, Bonte M, Hutchings T, Linden O, Egbuche U, Bruun KB, Smith JW (2017) Comparison of landfarming amendments to improve bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in Niger Delta soils. Sci Total Environ 596:284–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cai B, Ma J, Yan G, Dai X, Li M, Guo S (2016) Comparison of phytoremediation, bioaugmentation and natural attenuation for remediating saline soil contaminated by heavy crude oil. Biochem Eng J 112:170–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Calvo C, Martínez-Checa F, Toledo F, Porcel J, Quesada E (2002) Characteristics of bioemulsifiers synthesised in crude oil media by Halomonas eurihalina and their effectiveness in the isolation of bacteria able to grow in the presence of hydrocarbons. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 60:347–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cameselle C, Chirakkara RA, Reddy KR (2013) Electrokinetic-enhanced phytoremediation of soils: status and opportunities. Chemosphere 93:626–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Carmichael AB, Wong LL (2001) Protein engineering of Bacillus megaterium CYP102: the oxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Eur J Biochem 268:3117–3125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Chaillan F, Chaineau CH, Point V, Saliot A, Oudot J (2006) Factors inhibiting bioremediation of soil contaminated with weathered oils and drill cuttings. Environ Pollut 144:255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Chebbi A, Hentati D, Zaghden H, Baccar N, Rezgui F, Chalbi M, Chamkha M (2017) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation and biosurfactant production by a newly isolated Pseudomonas sp. strain from used motor oil-contaminated soil. Int Biodeter Biodegr 122:128–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Chen L, Chen Y, Chen L, Chen W (2009) Study on fungi–bacteria augmented remediation of petroleum contaminated soil from northwest of China. J Food Agric Environ 7:750–753Google Scholar
  33. Cherian S, Oliveira MM (2005) Transgenic plants in phytoremediation: recent advances and new possibilities. Environ Sci Technol 39:9377–9390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Chikere CB, Okpokwasili GC, Chikere BO (2011) Monitoring of microbial hydrocarbon remediation in the soil. 3 Biotech 1:117–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Chikere CB, Chikere BO, Okpokwasili GC (2012) Bioreactor-based bioremediation of hydrocarbon-polluted Niger Delta marine sediment, Nigeria. 3 Biotech 2:53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Cole GM (2018) Assessment and remediation of petroleum contaminated site. Taylor & Francis, RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Conley DM, Hansen KS, Stegemeier GR, Vinegar HJ, Fossati FR, Carl FG, Clough HF (2000). In situ thermal desorption of refined petroleum hydrocarbons from saturated soil. In: Second international conference on remediation of chlorinated and Racalcitrant compounds, Texas, pp 197–206Google Scholar
  38. Delille D, Delille B, Pelletier E (2002) Effectiveness of bioremediation of crude oil contaminated sub-Antarctic intertidal sediment: the microbial response. Microb Ecol 44:118–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Delille D, Pelletier E, Rodriguez-Blanco A, Ghiglione JF (2009) Effects of nutrient and temperature on degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in sub-Antarctic coastal seawater. Polar Biol 32:1521–1528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Demain AL, Vaishnav P (2009) Production of recombinant proteins by microbes and higher organisms. Biotechnol Adv 27:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. DEQ (2003) Risk-based decision making for the remediation of petroleum-contaminated sites. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon, pp 10–15Google Scholar
  42. De-qing S, Jian Z, Zhao-long G, Jian D, Tian-li W, Murygina V, Kalyuzhnyi S (2007) Bioremediation of oil sludge in Shengli oilfield. Water Air Soil Pollut 185:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Devinny J, Chang SH (2000) Bioaugmentation for soil bioremediation. In: Wise DL, Trantolo D (eds) Bioremediation of contaminated soils. Dekker, New York, pp 465–488Google Scholar
  44. Diab EA (2008) Phytoremediation of oil contaminated desert soil using the rhizosphere effects. Global J Environ Res 2:66–73Google Scholar
  45. Dong ZY, Huang WH, Xing DF, Zhang HF (2013) Remediation of soil co-contaminated with petroleum and heavy metals by the integration of electrokinetics and biostimulation. J Hazard Mater 260:399–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Dua M, Singh A, Sethunathan N, Johri AK (2002) Biotechnology and bioremediation: successes and limitations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. El Fantroussi S, Agathos SN (2005) Is bioaugmentation a feasible strategy for pollutant removal and site remediation? Curr Opin Microbiol 8:268–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ellis B, Balba T, Theile P (2012) Comparative bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil by biostimulation, bioaugmentation and surfactant addition. Indian J Environ Health 1:637–650Google Scholar
  49. Ellis DE, Lutz EJ, Odom JM, Buchanan RJ, Barlett CL, Lee MD, Harkness MR, DeWeerd KA (2000) Bioaugmentation for accelerated in-situ bioremediation. Environ Sci Technol 34:2254–2260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. EPD (2011) Practice guide for investigation and remediation of contaminated land. Environmental Protection Department (EPD), Hong Kong, pp 36–45Google Scholar
  51. Euliss K, Ho CH, Schwab A, Rock S, Banks MK (2008) Greenhouse and field assessment of phytoremediation for petroleum contaminants in a riparian zone. Bioresour Technol 99:1961–1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ezeji U, Anyadoh SO, Ibekwe VI (2007) Clean up of crude oil-contaminated soil. Terr Aquat Environ Toxicol 1:54–59Google Scholar
  53. Falciglia PP, Giustra MG, Vagliasindi FGA (2011) Low-temperature thermal desorption of diesel polluted soil: influence of temperature and soil texture on contaminant removal kinetics. J Hazard Mater 185:392–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Fann S, Pal D, Lory E, Karr L, Mathews AP, Price PA (1998) Hot air vapor extraction for remediation of petroleum contaminated sites. In: Eighth international offshore and polar engineering conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers Montréal, QuebecGoogle Scholar
  55. Fard MA, Aminzadeh B, Vahidi H (2013) Degradation of petroleum aromatic hydrocarbons using TiO2 nanopowder film. Environ Technol 34:1183–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Fingas M (2010) An overview of in-situ burning. In: Fingas M (ed) Oil spill science and technology. Gulf Professional Publishing, Burlington, pp 737–903Google Scholar
  57. Flores R, Blass G, Domínguez V (2007) Soil remediation by an advanced oxidative method assisted with ultrasonic energy. J Hazard Mater 140:399–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Frutos FJG, Escolano O, García S, Babín M, Fernández MD (2010) Bioventing remediation and ecotoxicity evaluation of phenanthrene-contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 183:806–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Galazka A, Krol M, Perzynski A (2012) The efficiency of rhizosphere bioremediation with Azospirillum sp. and Pseudomonas stutzeri in soils freshly contaminated with PAHs and diesel fuel. Pol J Environ Stud 21:345–353Google Scholar
  60. Gao G, Clare AS, Rose C, Caldwell GS (2017) Ulva rigida in the future ocean: potential for carbon capture, bioremediation, and biomethane production. GCB Bioenergy 2018:39–51Google Scholar
  61. Gao P, Li G, Dai X, Dai L, Wang H, Zhao L, Chen Y, Ma T (2013) Nutrients and oxygen alter reservoir biochemical characters and enhance oil recovery during biostimulation. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29:2045–2054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Garcia-Blanco S, Venosa AD, Suidan MT, Lee K, Cobanli S, Haines JR (2007) Biostimulation for the treatment of an oil-contaminated coastal salt marsh. Biodegradation 18:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Gargouri B, Karray F, Mhiri N, Aloui F, Sayadi S (2014) Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons-contaminated soil by bacterial consortium isolated from an industrial wastewater treatment plant. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 89:978–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Gentry TJ, Newby DT, Josephson KL, Pepper IL (2001) Soil microbial population dynamics following bioaugmentation with a 3-chlorobenzoate-degrading bacterial culture. Biodegradation 349:349–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Gentry TJ, Rensing C, Pepper IL (2004) New approaches for bioaugmentation as a remediation technology. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 34:447–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Germaine KJ, Byrne J, Liu X, Keohane J, Culhane J, Lally RD, Kiwanuka S, Ryan D, Dowling DN (2015) Ecopiling: a combined phytoremediation and passive biopiling system for remediating hydrocarbon impacted soils at field scale. Front Plant Sci 5:756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Germaine KJ, Liu X, Cabellos GG, Hogan JP, Ryan D, Dowling DN (2006) Bacterial endophyte-enhanced phytoremediation of the organochlorine herbicide 2,4- dichlorophenoxyacetic acid: bacterial endophyte-enhanced phytoremediation. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 57:302–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Gomez F, Sartaj M (2014) Optimization of field scale biopiles for bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil at low temperature conditions by response surface methodology (RSM). Int Biodeter Biodegr 89:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Gong XB (2012) Remediation of weathered petroleum oil-contaminated soil using a combination of biostimulation and modified Fenton oxidation. Int Biodeter Biodegr 70:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Gonzini O, Plaza A, Di Palma L, Lobo MC (2010) Electrokinetic remediation of gasoil contaminated soil enhanced by rhamnolipid. J Appl Electrochem 40:1239–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Gurska J, Wang W, Gerhardt KE, Khalid AM, Isherwood DM, Huang XD, Glick BR, Greenberg BM (2009) Three year field test of a plant growth promoting rhizobacteria enhanced phytoremediation system at a land farm for treatment of hydrocarbon waste. Environ Sci Technol 43:4472–4479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ha SA, You MY, Wang JP (2014) A study on the thermal desorption process of oil-contaminated soil by microwave. Mater Sci Forum 773:865–879Google Scholar
  73. He YM, Duan XG, Liu YS (2014) Enhanced bioremediation of oily sludge using co-culture of specific bacterial and yeast strains. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 89:1785–1792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Heinaru E, Merimaa M, Viggor S, Lehiste M, Leito I, Truu J, Heinaru A (2005) Biodegradation efficiency of functionally important populations selected for bioaugmentation in phenol- and oil-polluted area. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 51:363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Hejazi RF, Husain T, Khan FI (2003) Land farming operation of oily sludge in arid region – human risk assessment. J Hazard Mater 99:287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Holden PA, LaMontagne MG, Bruce AK, Miller WG, Lindow SE (2002) Assessing the role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa surface-active gene expression in hexadecane biodegradation in sand. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:2509–2518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Horel A, Schiewer S (2009) Investigation of the physical and chemical parameters affecting biodegradation of diesel and synthetic diesel fuel contaminating Alaskan soils. Cold Reg Sci Technol 58:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Hosokawa R, Nagai M, Morikawa M, Okuyama H (2009) Autochthonous bioaugmentation and its possible application to oil spills. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25:1519–1528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Hosseini MS (2006) In situ thermal desorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from lampblack impacted soils using natural gas combustion. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, UK, pp 1–144Google Scholar
  80. Hu H, Zhao Z, Gogotsi Y, Qiu J (2014) Compressible carbon nanotube-graphene hybrid aerogels with superhydrophobicity and superoleophilicity for oil sorption. Environ Sci Technol Lett 1:214–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Huang D, Xu Q, Cheng J, Lu X, Zhang H (2012) Electrokinetic remediation and its combined technologies for removal of organic pollutants from contaminated soils. Int J Electrochem Sci 7:4528–4544Google Scholar
  82. Huang XD, El-Alawi Y, Gurska J, Glick BR, Greenberg BM (2005) A multi-process phytoremediation system for decontamination of persistent total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) from soils. Microchem J 81:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Hultgren J, Pizzul L, Castillo MP, Granhall U (2009) Degradation of PAH in a creosote contaminated soil. A comparison between the effects of willows (Salix viminalis), wheat straw and a nonionic surfactant. Int J Phytoremediation 12:54–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Husain T (2004) Risk-based remediation of contaminated soil. In: Singh A, Ward OP (eds) Applied bioremediation and phytoremediation, soil biology, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, pp 255–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Isosaari P, Piskonen R, Ojala P, Voipio S, Eilola K, Lehmus E, Itavaara M (2007) Integration of electrokinetics and chemical oxidation for the remediation of creosote-contaminated clay. J Hazard Mater 144:538–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Iturbe R, Flores C, Chavez C, Bautista G, Torres LG (2004) Remediation of contaminated soil using soil washing and biopile methodologies at a field level. J Soil Sediment 4:115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Iturbe R, Torres LG, Flores CR, Chávez C, Bautista G (2003) Remediation of TPH/PAHs contaminated soil using soil washing. In: Tenth annual international petroleum environmental conference, TulsaGoogle Scholar
  88. Jacques RJS, Okeke BC, Bento FM, Teixeira AS, Peralba MCR, Comargo FAO (2008) Microbial consortium bioaugmentation of a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons contaminated soil. Bioresour Technol 99:2637–2643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Jameia MR, Khosravib MR, Anvaripoura B (2013) Degradation of oil from soil using nano zero valent iron. Sci Int 25:863–867Google Scholar
  90. Jiemvarangkul P, Zhang WX, Lien HL (2011) Enhanced transport of polyelectrolyte stabilized nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) in porous media. Chem Eng J 170:482–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Johnson OA, Affam AC (2018) Petroleum sludge treatment and disposal: a review. Environ Eng Res 24:191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Kamath R, Rentz JA, Schnoor JL, Alvarez PJJ (2004) Phytoremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils: principles and applications. Pet Biotechnol Dev Perspect 151:447–478Google Scholar
  93. Kang WH, Cheong JG, Kim K, Chae H, Chang CH (2012) Restoration of petroleum-contaminated soils by field-scale soil washing system. In: International conference on environmental science and technology, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  94. Kasai Y, Kishira H, Sasaki T, Syutsubo K, Watanabe K, Harayama S (2002) Predominant growth of Alcanivorax strains in oil-contaminated and nutrient-supplemented sea water. Environ Microbiol 4:141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Kirtland BC, Aelion CM (2000) Petroleum mass removal from low permeability sediment using air sparging/soil vapor extraction: impact of continuous or pulsed operation. J Contam Hydrol 41:367–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Kordel W, Bernhardt C, Derz K, Hund-Rinke K, Harmsen J, Peijnenburg W, Comans R, Terytze K (2013) Incorporating availability/bioavailability in risk assessment and decision making of polluted sites, Germany as example. J Hazard Mater 261:854–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Korolev VA, Romanyukha OV, Abyzova AM (2008) Electrokinetic remediation of oil-contaminated soils. J Environ Sci Health A43:876–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Kosaric N (2001) Biosurfactants and their application for soil bioremediation. Food Technol Biotechnol 39:295–304Google Scholar
  99. Kumari B, Singh DP (2016) A review on multifaceted application of nanoparticles in the field of bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons. Ecol Eng 97:98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Kuppusamy S, Palanisami T, Megharaj M, Venkateswarlu K, Naidu R (2016a) In-situ remediation approaches for the management of contaminated sites: a comprehensive overview. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 236:1–115Google Scholar
  101. Kuppusamy S, Palanisami T, Megharaj M, Venkateswarlu K, Naidu R (2016b) Ex-situ remediation technologies for environmental pollutants: a critical perspective. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 236:117–192Google Scholar
  102. Kuppusamy S, Thavamani P, Megharaj M, Naidu R (2016c) Bioaugmentation with novel microbial formula vs. natural attenuation of a long-term mixed contaminated soil – treatability studies in solid-and slurry-phase microcosms. Water Air Soil Pollut 227:25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Kuppusamy S, Thavamani P, Megharaj M, Naidu R (2016d) Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by novel bacterial consortia tolerant to diverse physical settings–assessments in liquid-and slurry-phase systems. Int Biodeter Biodegr 108:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Kuppusamy S, Thavamani P, Venkateswarlu K, Lee YB, Naidu R, Megharaj M (2017a) Remediation approaches for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) contaminated soils: technological constraints, emerging trends and future directions. Chemosphere 168:944–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Kuppusamy S, Venkateswarlu K, Megharaj M, Mayilswami S, Lee YB (2017b) Risk-based remediation of polluted sites: a critical perspective. Chemosphere 186:607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Kuyukina MS, Ivshina IB, Ritchkova MI, Philp JC, Cunningham CJ, Christofi N (2003) Bioremediation of crude oil-contaminated soil using slurry-phase biological treatment and land farming techniques. Soil Sediment Contam 12:85–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Li X, Wang X, Zhang Y, Cheng L, Liu J, Li F, Gao B, Zhou Q (2014) Extended petroleum hydrocarbon bioremediation in saline soil using Pt-free multianodes microbial fuel cells. RSC Adv 4:59803–59808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Li H, Zhao Q, Boufadel MC, Venosa AD (2007) A universal nutrient application strategy for the bioremediation of oil-polluted beaches. Mar Pollut Bull 54:1146–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Logan BE, Rabaey K (2012) Conversion of wastes into bioelectricity and chemicals by using microbial electrochemical technologies. Science 337:686–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Lu L, Huggins T, Jin S, Zuo Y, Ren ZJ (2014a) Microbial metabolism and community structure in response to bioelectrochemically enhanced remediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Environ Sci Technol 48:4021–4029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Lu L, Yazdi H, Jin S, Zuo Y, Fallgren PH, Ren ZJ (2014b) Enhanced bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil using pilot-scale bioelectrochemical systems. J Hazard Mater 274:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Lv H, Su X, Wang Y, Dai Z, Liu M (2018) Effectiveness and mechanism of natural attenuation at a petroleum-hydrocarbon contaminated site. Chemosphere 206:293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Ma XK, Ding N, Peterson EC (2015) Bioaugmentation of soil contaminated with high-level crude oil through inoculation with mixed cultures including Acremonium sp. Biodegradation 26:259–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Ma Y, Li X, Mao H, Wang B, Wang P (2018) Remediation of hydrocarbon–heavy metal co-contaminated soil by electrokinetics combined with biostimulation. Chem Eng J 353:410–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Maila MP, Cloete TE (2004) Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons through landfarming: are simplicity and cost-effectiveness the only advantages? Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 3:349–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Makadia TH, Adetutu EM, Simons KL, Jardine D, Sheppard PJ, Ball AS (2011) Re-use of remediated soils for the bioremediation of waste oil sludge. J Environ Manage 92:866–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Mandal AK, Sarma PM, Jeyaseelan CP, Channashettar VA, Singh B, Lal B, Datta J (2012) Large scale bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated waste at Indian oil refineries: case studies. Int J Life Sci Pharm Res 2:114–128Google Scholar
  118. Marcoux J, Déziel E, Villemur R, Lépine F, Bisaillon JG, Beaudet R (2000) Optimization of high-molecular-weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons degradation in a two-liquid-phase bioreactor. J Appl Microbiol 88:655–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. McCarthy K, Walker L, Vigoren L, Bartel J (2004) Remediation of spilled petroleum hydrocarbons by in situ landfarming at an arctic site. Cold Reg Sci Technol 40:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. McKew BA, Coulon F, Osborn AM, Timmis KN, McGenity TJ (2007) Determining the identity and roles of oil-metabolizing marine bacteria from the Thames estuary, UK. Environ Microbiol 9:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Meegoda JN, Veerawat K (2002) Ultrasound to decontaminate organics in dredged sediments. Soil Sediment Contam 11:91–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Memarian R, Ramamurthy AS (2012) Effects of surfactants on rhizodegradation of oil in a contaminated soil. J Environ Sci Health A 47:1486–1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Mench M, Lepp N, Bert V, Schwitzguebel JP, Gawronski W, Schroder P, Vangronsveld J (2010) Successes and limitations of phytotechnologies at field scale: outcomes, assessment and outlook from COST action 859. J Soil Sediment 10:1039–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Mendelssohn IA, Lin Q, Debusschere K, Penland S, Henry Jr CB, Overton EB, Portier RJ, Walsh MM, Rabalais NN (1995) Development of bioremediation for oil spill cleanup in coastal wetlands: products impacts and bioremediation potential. In: Proceedings of the international oil spill conference, Washington, DC, pp 97–100Google Scholar
  125. Mishra S, Sarma PM, Lal B (2004) Crude oil degradation efficiency of a recombinant Acinetobacter baumannii strain and its survival in crude oil-contaminated soil microcosm. FEMS Microbiol Lett 235:323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Mmom PC, Deekor T (2010) Assessing the effectiveness of land farming in the remediation of hydrocarbon polluted soils in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol 2:654–660Google Scholar
  127. Moretto L, Silvestri S, Ugo P, Zorzi G, Abbondanzi F, Baiocchi C, Iacondini A (2005) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons degradation by composting in a soot contaminated alkaline soil. J Hazard Mater 126:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Morris JM, Jin S, Crimi B, Pruden A (2009) Microbial fuel cell in enhancing anaerobic biodegradation of diesel. Chem Eng J 146:161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Morselli L, De Robertis C, Luzi J, Passarini F, Vassura I (2008) Environmental impacts of waste incineration in a regional system (Emilia Romagna, Italy) evaluated from a life cycle perspective. J Hazard Mater 159:505–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Murgueitio E, Cumbal L, Abril M, Izquierdo A, Debut A, Tinoco O (2018) Green synthesis of iron nanoparticles: application on the removal of petroleum oil from contaminated water and soils. J Nanotechnol 2018:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Nador F, Moglie Y, Vitale C, Yus M, Alonso F, Radivoy G (2010) Reduction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons promoted by cobalt or manganese nanoparticles. Tetrahedron 66:4318–4325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Naidu R, Pollard SJT, Bolan NS, Owens G, Pruszinski AW (2008) Chemical bioavailability in terrestrial environment. In: Hartemink AE, McBratney AB, Naidu R (eds) Developments in soil science, vol 32. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 53–72Google Scholar
  133. Naidu R, Wong MH, Nathanail P (2015) Bioavailability – the underlying basis for risk based land management. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:8775–8778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Nikolopoulou M, Kalogerakis N (2010) Biostimulation strategies for enhanced bioremediation of marine oil spills including chronic pollution. In: Timmis KN (ed) Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 2521–2529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Nikolopoulou M, Pasadakis N, Kalogerakis N (2013) Evaluation of autochthonous bioaugmentation and biostimulation during microcosm-simulated oil spills. Mar Pollut Bull 72:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Nwankwegu AS, Orji MU, Onwosi CO (2016) Studies on organic and in-organic biostimulants in bioremediation of diesel-contaminated arable soil. Chemosphere 162:148–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Omosiowho UE (2014) Comparative analysis of composting and landfarming as bioremediation techniques in hydrocarbon degradation. Int J Sci Environ 3:1977–1995Google Scholar
  138. Onwurah INE, Ogugua VN, Onyike NB, Ochonogor AE, Otitoju OF (2007) Crude oil spills in the environment, effects and some innovative clean-up biotechnologies. Int J Environ Res 1:307–320Google Scholar
  139. Orji FA, Ibiene AA, Dike EN (2012) Laboratory scale bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon–polluted mangrove swamps in the Niger Delta using cow dung. Malays J Microbiol 8:219–228Google Scholar
  140. Park G, Shin HS, Ko SO (2005) A laboratory and pilot study of thermally enhanced soil vapor extraction method for the removal of semi-volatile organic contaminants. J Environ Sci Health 40:881–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Pavía-Sanders A, Zhang S, Flores JA, Sanders JE, Raymond JE, Wooley KL (2013) Robust magnetic/polymer hybrid nanoparticles designed for crude oil entrapment and recovery in aqueous environments. ACS Nano 7:7552–7561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Pazos M, Iglesias O, Gómez J, Rosales E, Sanromán MA (2013) Remediation of contaminated marine sediment using electrokinetic–Fenton technology. J Ind Eng Chem 19:932–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Pilon-Smits E (2005) Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56:15–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Ramavandi B, Ghafarizadeh F, Alavi N, Babaei AA, Ahmadi M (2018) Biotreatment of total petroleum hydrocarbons from an oily sludge using co-composting approach. Soil Sediment Contam Int J 27:524–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Reddy KR, Ala PR, Sharma S, Kumar SN (2006) Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of contaminated manufactured gas plant soil. Eng Geol 85:132–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Riser-Roberts E (1998) Remediation of petroleum contaminated soils: biological, physical, and chemical processes. CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton, pp 1–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Ros M, Rodriguez I, Garcia C, Hernández T (2010) Microbial communities involved in the bioremediation of an aged recalcitrant hydrocarbon polluted soil by using organic amendments. Bioresour Technol 101:6916–6923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Roy A, Dutta A, Pal S, Gupta A, Sarkar J, Chatterjee A, Saha A, Sarkar P, Sar P, Kazy SK (2018) Biostimulation and bioaugmentation of native microbial community accelerated bioremediation of oil refinery sludge. Bioresour Technol 253:22–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Ruberto LA, Vazquez SC, Curtosi A, Mestre MC, Pelletier E, Mac Cormack WP (2006) Phenanthrene biodegradation in soils using an Antarctic bacterial consortium. Biorem J 10:191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Saien J, Shahrezaei F (2012) Organic pollutants removal from petroleum refinery wastewater with nanotitania photocatalyst and UV light emission. Int J Photoenergy 5:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Sandu C, Popescu M, Rosales E, Pazos M, Lazar G, Sanromán MÁ (2017) Electrokinetic oxidant soil flushing: a solution for in situ remediation of hydrocarbons polluted soils. J Electroanal Chem 799:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Sankaran S, Pandey S, Sumathy K (1998) Experimental investigation on waste heat recovery by refinery oily sludge incineration using fluidised-bed technique. J Environ Sci Health A 33:829–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Sanscartier D, Laing T, Reimer K, Zeeb B (2009) Bioremediation of weathered petroleum hydrocarbon soil contamination in the Canadian High Arctic: laboratory and field studies. Chemosphere 77:1121–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Sarkar D, Ferguson M, Datta R, Birnbaum S (2005) Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated soils: comparison of biosolids addition, carbon supplementation, and monitored natural attenuation. Environ Pollut 136:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Sayara T, Borràs E, Caminal G, Sarrà M, Sánchez A (2011) Bioremediation of PAHs-contaminated soil through composting: influence of bioaugmentation and biostimulation on contaminant biodegradation. Int Biodeter Biodegr 65:859–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Seth CS (2012) A review on mechanisms of plant tolerance and role of transgenic plants in environmental clean-up. Bot Rev 78:32–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Shearer TL (1991) A comparison of in situ vitrification and rotary kiln incineration for soils treatment. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 41:1259–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Sheppard PJ, Simons KL, Kadali KK, Patil SS, Ball AS (2012) The importance of weathered crude oil as a source of hydrocarbonoclastic microorganisms in contaminated seawater. J Microbiol Biotechnol 22:1185–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Shirdam R, Zand A, Bidhendi G, Mehrdadi N (2008) Phytoremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils with emphasis on the effect of petroleum hydrocarbons on the growth of plant species. Phytoprotection 89:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Silva IS, Grossman M, Durrant LR (2009) Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (2–7 rings) under microaerobic and very-low-oxygen conditions by soil fungi. Int Biodeter Biodegr 63:224–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Singh A, Nigam PS, Murphy JD (2011) Renewable fuels from algae: an answer to debatable land based fuels. Bioresour Technol 102:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Sinha RK, Bharambe G, Ryan D (2008) Converting wasteland into wonderland by earthworms – a low-cost nature’s technology for soil remediation: a case study of vermiremediation of PAHs contaminated soil. Environmentalist 28:466–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Soares AA, Albergaria JT, Domingues VF, Maria da Conceição M, Delerue-Matos C (2010) Remediation of soils combining soil vapor extraction and bioremediation: benzene. Chemosphere 80:823–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Soleimani M, Afyuni M, Hajabbasi MA, Nourbakhsh F, Sabzalian MR, Christensen JH (2010) Phytoremediation of an aged petroleum contaminated soil using endophyte infected and non-infected grasses. Chemosphere 81:1084–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Song W, Li J, Zhang W, Hu X, Wang L (2012) An experimental study on the remediation of phenanthrene in soil using ultrasound and soil washing. Environ Earth Sci 66:1487–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Sprocati AR, Alisi C, Tasso F, Marconi P, Sciullo A, Pinto V, Chiavarini S, Ubaldi C, Cremisini C (2012) Effectiveness of a microbial formula, as a bioaugmentation agent, tailored for bioremediation of diesel oil and heavy metal co-contaminated soil. Process Biochem 47:1649–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Stegemeier GL, Vinegar HJ (2001) Thermal conduction heating for in-situ thermal desorption of soils. In: Oh CH (ed) Hazardous and radioactive waste treatment technologies handbook, 1st edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–51Google Scholar
  168. Suja F, Rahim F, Taha MR, Hambali N, Razali MR, Khalid A, Hamzah A (2014) Effects of local microbial bioaugmentation and biostimulation on the bioremediation of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in crude oil contaminated soil based on laboratory and field observations. Int Biodeter Biodegr 90:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Taccari M, Milanovic V, Comitini F, Casucci C, Ciani M (2012) Effects of biostimulation and bioaugmentation on diesel removal and bacterial community. Int Biodeter Biodegr 66:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Thangavadivel K (2010) Development and application of ultrasound technology for treatment of organic pollutants. PhD thesis, University of South Australia, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  171. Throne-Holst M, Wentzel A, Ellingsen TE, Kotlas HK, Zotchev SB (2007) Identification of novel genes involved in long-chain n-alkane degradation by Acinetobacter sp. strain DSM 17874. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:3327–3332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Torres LG, Aguirre AL, Verdejo A, Iturbe R (2005) Enhanced soil-washing treatment for soils which are highly contaminated with crude oil. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 81:1–10Google Scholar
  173. Tratnyek PG, Johnson RL (2006) Nanotechnologies for environmental cleanup. Nano Today 1:44–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Tsutsumi H, Kono M, Takai K, Manabe T, Haraguchi M, Yamamoto I, Oppenheimer C (2000) Bioremediation on the shore after an oil spill from the Nakhodka in the sea of Japan. III. Field tests of a bioremediation agent with microbiological cultures for the treatment of an oil spill. Mar Pollut Bull 40:320–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Ueno A, Hasanuzzaman M, Yumoyo I, Okuyama H (2006) Verification of degradation of n-alkanes in diesel oil by Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain Wat G in soil microcosms. Curr Microbiol 52:182–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Van Aken B (2009) Transgenic plants for enhanced phytoremediation of toxic explosives. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20:231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Vecchioli GI, Dei Panno MT, Painceira MT (1990) Use of selected autochthonous soil bacteria to enhance degradation of hydrocarbons in soil. Environ Pollut 67:249–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Vervaeke P, Luyssaert S, Mertens J, Meers E, Tack F, Lust N (2003) Phytoremediation prospects of willow stand on contaminated sediment: a field trial. Environ Pollut 126:275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Vidonish JE, Zygourakis K, Masiello CA, Sabadell G, Alvarez PJ (2016) Thermal treatment of hydrocarbon-impacted soils: a review of technology innovation for sustainable remediation. Engineering 2:426–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Villemur R, Deziel E, Benachenhou A, Marcoux J, Gauthier E, Lépine F, Beaudet R, Comeau Y (2000) Two-liquid-phase slurry bioreactors to enhance the degradation of high-molecular-weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil. Biotechnol Prog 16:966–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Virkutyte J, Sillanpaa M, Latostenmaa P (2002) Electrokinetic soil remediation: critical overview. Sci Total Environ 289:97–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Walworth J, Pond A, Snape I, Rayner J, Ferguson S, Harvey P (2007) Nitrogen requirements for maximizing petroleum bioremediation in a sub-Antarctic soil. Cold Reg Sci Technol 48:84–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Wan C, Du M, Lee DJ, Yang X, Ma W, Zheng L (2011) Electrokinetic remediation of β-cyclodextrin dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil using multiple electrodes. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 42:972–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Wang H, Heil D, Ren ZJ, Xu P (2015) Removal mechanisms of trace organic compounds in microbial fuel cells. Chemosphere 125:94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Wang X, Cai Z, Zhou Q, Zhang Z, Chen C (2012) Bioelectrochemical stimulation of petroleum hydrocarbon degradation in saline soil using U-tube microbial fuel cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 109:426–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Wang H, Ren ZJ (2013) A comprehensive review of microbial electrochemical systems as a platform technology. Biotechnol Adv 31:1796–1807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Ward O, Singh A, Van Hamme J (2003) Accelerated biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbon waste. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 30:260–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Wood LA (2002) Overview of remediation technologies. Terra Resources Ltd., Aaska, p 6Google Scholar
  189. Wu M, Dick WA, Li W, Wang X, Yang Q, Wang T, Xu L, Zhang M, Chen L (2016) Bioaugmentation and biostimulation of hydrocarbon degradation and the microbial community in a petroleum-contaminated soil. Int Biodeter Biodegr 107:158–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Xu R, Yong LC, Lim YG, Obbard JP (2005) Use of slow-release fertilizer and biopolymers for stimulating hydrocarbon biodegradation in oil–contaminated beach sediments. Mar Pollut Bull 51:1101–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Yeung AT (2010) Remediation technologies for contaminated sites. In: Chen Y, Zhan L, Tang X (eds) Advances in environmental geotechnics. Zhejiang University Press, Hangzhou, pp 328–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. Ying T, Luo YM, Sun MM, Liu ZJ, Li ZG, Christie P (2010) Effect of bioaugmentation by Paracoccus sp. strain HPD-2 on the soil microbial community and removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from an aged contaminated soil. Bioresour Technol 101:3437–3443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Yuan Y, Zhou S, Zhuang L (2010) A new approach to in situ sediment remediation based on air-cathode microbial fuel cells. J Soil Sediment 10:1427–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. Zaida N, Piakong MT (2017) Effectiveness of single and microbial consortium in bioaugmentation of oil sludge contaminated soil at different concentration levels: a laboratory scale. J Bioremed Biodegr 9:430Google Scholar
  195. Zaida ZN, Piakong MT (2019) Bioaugmentation of petroleum hydrocarbon in contaminated soil: a review. In: Vivek K, Manoj K, Ram P (eds) Microbial action on hydrocarbons. Springer, Singapore, pp 415–439Google Scholar
  196. Zhang K, Hua XF, Han HL, Wang J, Miao CC, Xu YY, Huang ZD, Zhang H, Yang JM, Jin WB, Liu YM (2008) Enhanced bioaugmentation of petroleum-and salt-contaminated soil using wheat straw. Chemosphere 73:1387–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. Zhang W, Li J, Han Y, Song W (2010) Experimental study on the remediation of oil contaminated soil using ultrasound. Chin J Environ Eng, DOI:10.1109/ICBBE.2010.5516737Google Scholar
  198. Zhang Y, Wang X, Li X, Cheng L, Wan L, Zhou Q (2014) Horizontal arrangement of anodes of microbial fuel cells enhances remediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:2335–2341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. Zhu X, Tian S, Cai Z (2012) Toxicity assessment of iron oxide nanoparticles in zebrafish (Danio rerio) early life stages. PLoS One 7:e46286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. Ziolli RL, Jardim WF (2002) Photocatalytic decomposition of seawater-soluble crude-oil fractions using high surface area colloid nanoparticles of TiO2. J Photochem Photobiol A 147:205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Environmental StudiesAnna UniversityChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud y Departamento de investigaciónUniversidad Técnica de ManabíPortoviejoEcuador
  3. 3.Global Centre for Environmental RemediationThe University of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia
  4. 4.NelloreIndia

Personalised recommendations