Advertisement

Liquidity Risk Management in Islamic Banks: Evidences from Malaysia

  • Muhammed Habib DolgunEmail author
  • Adam Ng
Chapter

Abstract

The factors that affect liquidity risk management of Islamic banks in Malaysia are studied in this chapter by assessing the short-term and long-term determinants of these banks’ liquidity holdings. Monthly data is employed over the period of 2007–2015 based on the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model that incorporates Sukuk, interbank market rate, required reserves, inflation rate, and credit default swap rate. The ARDL cointegration test reveals that total assets, deposits, inflation, government bonds, capital adequacy, and interbank interest rate show positive significant relations with liquidity. However, it is found that the CDS rate of the country, statutory reserves, and Sukuk stocks show negative significant relations with the liquidity. These results are consistent with previous studies’ findings. Furthermore, the Granger causality tests reveal that Malaysian Islamic banks’ liquidity is related to interbank rate which signs that the change in government bond rate has causal effect on liquidity of Islamic banks. Moreover, total assets are related to liquidity and deposits, CDS, required reserves, and capital. As well as total assets, liquidity has causal effect on credit, deposit, CDS, and interbank rate. The main result is that market liquidity influences banks’ liquidity, and banks’ liquidity responds to the profitability of Islamic banks. Granger analysis and impulse response analysis show that these banks’ liquidity management has a direct causal relation with market liquidity and indirect causal relation with funding liquidity.

Keywords

Islamic banks Regulation Liquidity Malaysia ARDL 

JEL Classification

C32 E42 G21 G32 

References

  1. AbdulGaniyy, A., Ogunbado, A. F., & Ahmad, N. H. (2017). Islamic perspectives on liquidity risk management practices of Islamic banks in Malaysia and Bahrain. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies., 5(1), 100–108.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, N., Ahmed, Z., & Naqvi, I. H. (2011). Liquidity risk and islamic banks: Evidence from Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, 1(9), 99–102.Google Scholar
  3. Akhtar, S. (2007). Building an effective Islamic financial system. Global Islamic Financial Forum Governor’s: Financial Regulators Forum in Islamic Finance, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Google Scholar
  4. Akhtar, M. F., Ali, K., & Sadaqat, S. (2011). Factors influencing the profitability of Islamic banks of Pakistan. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics., 66, 117–124.Google Scholar
  5. Alam, N. (2013). Impact of banking regulation on risk and efficiency in Islamic banking. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 11(1), 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aldasoro, I., & Faia, E. (2016). Systemic loops and liquidity regulation. Journal of Financial Stability, 27, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Amin, S. I. M. (2016). Liquidity risk determinants: Are islamic banks different from conventional banks? Dissertation. Petaling Jaya: INCEIF.Google Scholar
  8. Arif, A., & Anees, A. N. (2012). Liquidity risk and performance of banking system. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 20(2), 182–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ariffin, N. M. (2012). Liquidity risk management and financial performance in Malaysia: Empirical evidence from Islamic banks. Aceh International Journal of Social Sciences, 1(2), 77–84.Google Scholar
  10. Banerjee, R. N., & Mio, H. (2014). The impact of liquidity regulation on banks. In BIS Working Papers No. 470. Basel: Bank of International Settlement.Google Scholar
  11. BIS, (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision-BCBS) (2013. Basel III: The liquidity coverage ratio and liquidity risk monitoring tools.Google Scholar
  12. Bonner, C. (2014). In Center for Economic Research (Ed.), Liquidity regulation and bank behaviour. Tilburg: CentER.Google Scholar
  13. Boudt, K., Paulus, E. C. S., & Rosenthal, D. W. R. (2017). Funding liquidity, market liquidity and TED spread: A two-regime model. Journal of Empirical Finance, 43, 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chong, B. S., & Liu, M. L. (2009). Islamic banking: Interest-free or interest-based? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 17, 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cucinelli, D. (2013). The relationship between liquidity risk and probability of default: Evidence from the Euro area. Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets and Institutions, 3(1), 42–50.Google Scholar
  16. Distinguin, I., Roulet, C., & Tarazi, A. (2013). Bank regulatory capital and liquidity: Evidence from US and European publicly traded banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(9), 3295–3317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Demirguc-Kunt, A., Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2004). Regulations, Market Structure, Institutions, and the Cost of Financial Intermediation, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36(3), 593–622.Google Scholar
  18. Ergec, E. H., & Aslan, B. G. (2013). Impact of Interest Rates on Islamic and Conventional Banks: The Case of Turkey. Applied Economics, 45(17), 2381–2388.Google Scholar
  19. Fuhrer, L. M., Müller, B., & Steiner, L. (2017). The liquidity coverage ratio and security prices. Journal of Banking and Finance, 75, 292–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gujarati, D. N. (2011). Basic Econometrics, Fifth Edition. The McGraw-Hill Companies.Google Scholar
  22. Haan, L. D., & End, J. W. (2013). Bank liquidity, the maturity ladder, and regulation. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(10), 3930–3950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hesse, H., Andreas, A. J., & Sole, J. (2008). Trend and changes in Islamic finance. World Economics, 9(2), 175–193.Google Scholar
  24. Hong, H., Huang, J. Z., & Wu, D. (2014). The information content of Basel III liquidity risk measures. Journal of Financial Stability, 15, 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. IFSB. (2015a). Islamic financial services industry stability report 2015. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Financial Services Board.Google Scholar
  26. IFSB. (2015b). Guidance note on quantitative measures for liquidity risk management in institutions offering Islamic financial services. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Financial Services Board-15.Google Scholar
  27. IFSB. (2017). Islamic financial services industry stability report 2017. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Financial Services Board.Google Scholar
  28. Ismal, R. (2010). Assessing the demand and supply of liquidity in Islamic banking (the case of Indonesia). ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 2(1), 85–110.Google Scholar
  29. Khediri, K. B., Charfeddined, L., & Youssef, S. B. (2015). Islamic versus conventional banks in the GCC countries: A comparative study using classification techniques. Research in International Business and Finance., 33, 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krasicka, O., & Nowak, S. (2012). What’s in it for me? A primer on differences between Islamic and conventional finance in Malaysia. In IMF Working Paper, WP/12/151. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  31. Kumar, T. V. (2008). Why liquidity is important for banks. GT News Global Treasury Intelligence, London: The Global Treasurer.Google Scholar
  32. Laštůvková, J. (2016). Liquidity determinants of the selected banking sectors and their size groups. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 64(3), 972–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leykun, F. (2016). Determinants of commercial banks’ liquidity risk: Evidence from Ethiopia. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 7(15), 47–61.Google Scholar
  34. Maghrebi, N., & Mirakhor, A. (2015). Risk sharing and shared prosperity in Islamic finance. Islamic Economic Studies, 23(2), 85–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mirakhor, A. (2012). Islamic finance, risk sharing and macroeconomic policies. MPRA Paper No., 56338, 1–42.Google Scholar
  36. Mohamad, A. A. S., Mohamad, M. T., & Samsudin, M. L. (2013). How Islamic banks of Malaysia managing liquidity? An emphasis on confronting economic cycles. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(7), 253–263.Google Scholar
  37. Mohammad, S. (2015). Liquidity risk Management in Islamic Banks: A survey. Afro Eurasian Studies, 1(2), 215–230.Google Scholar
  38. Mongid, A. (2015). Liquidity risk Management in the Islamic Rural Banking: Evidence from Indonesia. Banks and Bank Systems, 10(3), 61–67.Google Scholar
  39. Obiyathulla, I. P. (2008). The Islamic inter bank money market and a dual banking system: The Malaysian experience. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 1(3), 210–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ogilo, F., & Mugenyah, L. O. (2015). Determinants of liquidity risk of commercial banks in Kenya. The International Journal of Business and Management, 3(9), 256–265.Google Scholar
  41. Poorman, F., & Blake, J. (2005). Measuring and modelling liquidity risk: New ideas and metrics. FMS White Paper. Chicago: Financial Managers Society Inc.Google Scholar
  42. Praet, P., & Herzberg, V. (2008). In Financial Stability Review Banque de France (Ed.), Market liquidity and banking liquidity: Linkages, vulnerabilities and the role of disclosure (Vol. 11, pp. 95–109).Google Scholar
  43. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to The Analysis of Level Relationships, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.Google Scholar
  44. Rashid, A., & Jabeen, S. (2016). Analysing performance determinants: Conventional versus islamic banks in Pakistan. Borsa Istanbul Review., 16(2), 92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roman, A., & Sargu, A. C. (2015). The impact of bank-specific factors on the commercial banks liquidity: Empirical evidence from CEE countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 20(15), 571–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saeed, M., & Izzeldin, M. (2014). Examining the relationship between default risk and efficiency in Islamic and conventional banks. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 132.(Supplement, 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Verhoef, B., Azahaf, S., & Bijkerk, W. (2008). Islamic finance and supervision: An exploratory analysis. In DNB Occasional Studies 6(3). Amsterdam: de Netherlandsche Bank.Google Scholar
  48. Vodova, P. (2013). Determinants of commercial bank liquidity in Hungary. Financial Internet Quarterly, e-Finanse, 9(3), 64–71.Google Scholar
  49. Wagner, W. (2007). The liquidity of bank assets and banking stability. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(1, 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yaacob, S. F., Abdul Rahman, A., & Abdul Karim, Z. (2016). The determinants of liquidity risk: A panel study of Islamic banks in Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Issues and Thought, 6, 73–82.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Research and Training Institute 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.INCEIF, Selangor, Malaysia, and Central Bank of the Republic of TurkeyAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Research Management Centre, INCEIFPetaling JayaMalaysia

Personalised recommendations