Advertisement

Fragmented Solidarity

  • Jake Lin
Chapter
Part of the Politics and Development of Contemporary China book series (PDCC)

Abstract

This chapter discusses the third pillar of the psychic trap for labor movement—workers’ fragmented sense solidarity. It seeks to analyze several psychic factors underpinning a divided working class. Diminishing social trust amongst fellow workers is one of the fundamental obstacles that affect Chinese labor activism. The chapter goes on to examine, from a psychic perspective, why workers are risk-averse and unwilling to participate in collective industrial action. It then discusses workers’ unusual reaction to the loss of their leaders, as well as their sense of coalition building with other marginalized groups. Workers and activists’ differing sense of solidarity is highlighted throughout the chapter. Workers psychic state of solidarity is further explored in the case of Foowah factory in Shenzhen, where workers tried to organize a strike to protect their rights.

References

  1. Beckwith, K. (2000). Hinges in collective action: Strategic innovation in the Pittston coal strike. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 5(2), 179–199.Google Scholar
  2. Benson, M., & Rochon, T. R. (2004). Interpersonal trust and the magnitude of protest: A micro and macro level approach. Comparative Political Studies, 37(4), 435–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumer, H. (1969). Collective behavior. In A. M. Lee (Eds.), Principles of sociology (pp. 165–220). New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
  4. Chan, A. (2018). The relationship between labour NGOs and Chinese workers in an authoritarian regime. Global Labour Journal, 9(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crossley, N. (2002). Making sense of social movements. London: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  6. Deng, Y., & O’Brien, K. J. (2013). Relational repression in China: Using social ties to demobilize protesters. The China Quarterly, 215, 533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fu, D. (2017). Mobilizing without the masses: Control and contention in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ganz, M. (2009). Why David sometimes wins: Leadership, organization, and strategy in the California farm worker movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  9. Gries, P., & Rosen, S. (2010). Chinese politics: State, society and the market. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Hunt, S. A., & Benford, R. D. (2004). Collective identity, solidarity, and commitment. The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, 433, 57.Google Scholar
  11. Jasper, J. M., & Poulsen, J. D. (1995). Recruiting strangers and friends: Moral shocks and social networks in animal rights and anti-nuclear protests. Social Problems, 42(4), 493–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jenkins, J. C., & Perrow, C. (1977). Insurgency of the powerless: Farm worker movements (1946–1972). American Sociological Review, 42(2), 249–268.Google Scholar
  13. Lee, C. K., & Zhang, Y. (2013). The power of instability: Unraveling the micro foundations of bargained authoritarianism in China. American Journal of Sociology, 118(6), 1475–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McAdam, D. (1988). Freedom summer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Perry, E. J. (1993). Shanghai on strike: The politics of Chinese labor. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Tilly, C. (2007, March). Trust networks in transnational migration. In Sociological forum (Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 3–24). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tilly, C., & Wood, L. J. (2009). Social movements, 1768–2008 (2nd ed.). Boulder: Paradigm Publication.Google Scholar
  19. Walsh, E. J., & Warland, R. H. (1983). Social movement involvement in the wake of a nuclear accident: Activists and free riders in the TMI area. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 764–780. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jake Lin
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Global StudiesTokyo University of Foreign StudiesTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations