Advertisement

Managing Projects in the Public Sector: From Fragility to Agility and Innovation

  • Morad L. Taqateqah
  • Khalid Al MarriEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 43)

Abstract

Innovation for all organisations is the lifeblood that provides them with the strength to adopt market changes by creating innovative business opportunities. For the past decade, service providers in the public sector have faced the impact of the transformations caused by the emerge of “the Fourth Industrial Revolution”, which led to almost make the followed Public Management processes and procedures obsolete. This study intends to provide insights into the relationship between innovation champions empowerment and innovation projects success. The aim of this study is to addresses the question: ‘How does the empowerment of Innovation champions influence the success of the innovation projects within the public sector?’. As a lesson-learned from private sector empowerment, this study applies the adopted empowerment approaches in order to prove a significance of extent the innovation champions’ empowerment in the public sector would encourage their line managers to perceive innovation risk as a viable one and become more innovative. The research method involves surveying 40 innovation champions from several public organisations. The outcomes show empowering innovation champions are contributing to making their organisations more innovative. However, there is a challenge caused by those line managers who are not accepting the innovation risk and just play a single role as supervisors, which grounds the fragility in innovation adoption through creating a resistance for innovation risk acceptance. Based on this study outcomes, it is suggested that public sector management should apply multiple managerial styles of sponsoring and supervising innovation project to facilitate innovation adoption and implementation. On the other hand, empowering innovation champions would support changes in the internal working environments and lead to encourage their line managers to accept innovation risk and play situational leadership (sponsor and supervisor); at the same time, such approach would make innovation champions more committed to the innovation success through a sense of ownership. Overall, innovation champions’ empowerment and management style are both relevant and related to innovation projects success in the public sector. This result also offers an academic value through recognising the direct relation between innovation champions’ empowerment, management role, and innovation project success in the public sector context.

Keywords

Empowerment Innovation champions Public sector innovation 

References

  1. 1.
    Bekkers V, Edelenbos J, Steijn B (2011) Innovation in the public sector. Linking capacity and leadership. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berry FS (1994) Innovation in public management: the adoption of strategic planning. Public Adm Rev 54(5):322–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhatti Y, Olsen A, Pedersen L (2011) Administrative professionals and the diffusion of innovations: the case of citizen service centres. Pub Admin 89(2):577–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borins S (2000) Loose cannons and rule breakers, or enterprising leaders? Some evidence about innovative public managers. Pub Adm Rev 60:498–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borins S (2000) What border? Public management innovation in the United States and Canada. J Policy Anal Manage: J Assoc Public Policy Anal Manag 19(1):46–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borins S (2001) Encouraging innovation in the public sector. J Intell Capital 2(3):310–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cross R, Cummings J (2004) Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Acad Manag J 47:928–937Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Damanpour F (1991) Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad Manag J 34(3):555–590Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Damanpour F, Aravind D (2011) Managerial innovation: conceptions, processes, and antecedents. Manag Org Rev 8(2):423–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Damanpour F, Schneider M (2009) Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: assessing the role of managers. J Pub Admin Res Theory 19(3):495–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Danneels E (2002) The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strateg Manag J 23:1095–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Vries H, Bekkers V, Tummers L (2016) Innovation in the public sector: a systematic review and future research agenda. Pub Adm 94(1):146–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dougherty D, Hardy C (1996) Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Acad Manag J 39(5):1120–1153Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fagerberg J, Mowery D, Nelson R (2005) The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Flynn N (2007) Public sector management, 5th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fakhrul I (2015) New public management (NPM): a dominating paradigm in public sectors. African J Polit Sci Int Relat 9(4):141–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Filippov S, Mooi H (2010) Innovation project management. J Innov Sustain. ISSN 2179-3565Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Foster J (2001) Data analysis using SPSS for windows versions 8–10. SAGE Publications, Limited, Thousand OaksCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Garud R, Van De Ven AH (1992) An empirical evaluation of the internal corporate venturing process. Strateg Manage J 13(S1):93–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Groot T, Budding T (2008) New Public Management’s current issues and future prospects. Financ Account Manag 24(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harrison JS, Freeman RE (2004) Special topic: democracy in and around organizations: is organizational democracy worth the effort? Acad Manag Exec 18(9):49–53Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hornsby JS, Kuratko DF, Zahra SA (2002) Middle managers’ perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale. J Bus Ventur 17:253–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kavanagh D, Naughton E (2009) Innovation and project management—exploring the links. PM World Today 11(4):1–7Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kelley D, Lee H (2010) Managing innovation champions: the impact of project characteristics on the direct manager role. Dev Manag Assoc 27:1007–1019Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kwak Y, Anbari F (2009) Analyzing project management research: perspectives from top management journals. Int J Project Manage 27(5):435–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lewis MW, Welsh MA, Dehler G, Green S (2002) Product development tensions: exploring contrasting styles of project management. Acad Manag J 45(3):546–564Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Maylor H (2005) Project management, 3rd revised media edn. Pearson Education Ltd, EssexGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McGrath RG (2001) Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Acad Manage J 44(1):118–131Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Meijer AJ (2014) From hero-innovators to distributed heroism: an in-depth analysis of the role of individuals in public sector innovation. Pub Manag Rev 16(2):199–216MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Parsons W (2006) Innovation in the public sector: spare tyres and fourth plinths. Innov J Pub Sect Innov J 11(2), Article1Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Potts J (2009) The innovation deficit in public services: the curious problem of too much efficiency and not enough waste and failure. Innov Manag Policy Practice 11(1):34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Quinn JB (1985) Managing innovation: controlled chaos. Harvard Bus Rev 63(3):73–84Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Roure L (2001) Product Champion characteristics in France and Germany. Hum Relat 54(5):663–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A (2016) Research methods for business students. Pearson, Harlow (Essex)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Strebel P (1992) Breakpoints: how managers exploit radical business change. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Townsend W (2013) Innovation and the perception of risk management in the public sector. Int J Org Innov 5(3):21Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tushman M, Nadler D (1986) Organizing for innovation. Calif Manage Rev 28(3):74–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Walker RM (2014) Internal and external antecedents of process innovation: a review and extension’. Pub Manag Rev 16(1):21–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business and LawThe British University in DubaiDubaiUnited Arab Emirates
  2. 2.Department of Engineering and ITThe British University in DubaiDubaiUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations