Advertisement

The Global Innovation Index as a Measure of Triple Helix Engagement

  • Emanuela TodevaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 43)

Abstract

This paper reviews the leading scoring systems for measuring innovation capabilities on a global scale providing comparability across developed and developing countries. Each Index is introduced with its background, methodology, and how it reflects on different Triple Helix constituencies. The first OECD framework developed a methodology for measuring business-led innovation, justified with the mid-twentieth century scientific believe, that universities merely supply labour markets, and government is performing a regulatory role, influencing the environment. The World Bank framework on measuring the knowledge Economy brings in a stronger system view with the role of institutions and late 20th century believes. The EU Innovation Scoreboard, while using the OECD methodology and measures for R&D intensity, expands in the direction of enablers from the university education, public sector research, direct and indirect financial support, and the accumulation of broader economic effects from the innovation process. The Global Innovation Index adds little to this portfolio, but offers a simplified version of innovation inputs, outputs and intensity measure, enabling to extend the comparability across countries. Overall the evolution of innovation indexing is moving towards a recognition of the complex and dynamic realities of interactions between university science, business innovation and government investment in system-level policies and projects, but the measurement remains focused on individual helices.

Keywords

Global innovation index Triple helix framework Knowledge economy EU innovation scoreboard Competitiveness 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on the Key-Note presentation by Prof. Emanuela Todeva at the 2nd Triple Helix International Summit in Dubai, 10–13 November 2018, with the sponsorship of the British University of Dubai, Mohammed Bin Rashid School of Government, University of Dubai, Al-Maktoum College of Higher Education, American University of Ras Al Khaiman, Al Maktoum Foundation, Dubai Department of Tourism and Commerce Marketing, Dubai Supreme Council of Energy and Al Sahel Contracting Company.

References

  1. 1.
    Arvis J-F, Ojala L, Wiederer C, Shepherd B, Raj A, Dairabayeva K, Kiiski T (2018) Connecting to compete: trade logistics in the global economy. World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Byat AB, O du Sultan (2014) The United Arab Emirates: fostering a unique innovation ecosystem for a knowledge-based economy. In: Global Innovation index. INSEAD, Fontainebleau, pp 101–111Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen D, Dahlman C (2005) The knowledge economy, the KAM methodology and world bank operations. World Bank, Washington, DC. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/695211468153873436/The-knowledge-economy-the-KAM-methodology-and-World-Bank-operations
  4. 4.
    Cornell University, INSEAD, WIPO (2014). The Global Innovation Index 2014: the human factor in innovation, Fontainebleau, Ithaca, and GenevaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cornell University, INSEAD, WIPO (2015). The Global Innovation Index 2015: effective innovation policies for development, Fontainebleau, Ithaca, and GenevaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cornell University, INSEAD, WIPO (2018) The Global Innovation Index 2018: energizing the world with innovation, Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and GenevaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cornell University, INSEAD, WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) (2013) The Global Innovation Index 2013. In: Dutta S, Lanvin B (eds) The local dynamics of innovation. Cornell, INSEAD, and WIPO, Geneva, Ithaca, and FontainbleauGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    EC (2013) Innovation Union Competitiveness Report, 2013 edn. Presentation by Pierre Vigier Head of Unit Economic Analysis and IndicatorsGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Etzkowitz Henry (2003) Innovation in innovation: the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Soc Sci Inf 42(3):293–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (2000) The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations’. Res Policy 29:109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    European Commission (2014) Research and innovation performance in the EU: innovation union progress at country level. EC, DG for Research and Innovation, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eurostat and OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2005) Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, 3rd edn. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    UAE Government (2015) Science, technology & innovation policy in the United Arab EmiratesGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    INSEAD (2011) The Global Innovation Index 2011. In: Dutta S (ed) Accelerating growth and development. INSEAD, FontainebleauGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leydesdorff L (2016) Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Transl Sci 2016:1844–1852Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Milbergs E, Vonortas N (2004) Innovation metrics: measurement to insight. Center for Accelerating Innovation and George Washington University, National Innovation Initiative 21st Century Working Group, p 22Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    OECD (1992) Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data: Oslo Manual. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    OECD (1996) The knowledge-based economy. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    OECD (2013) Knowledge networks and markets. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 7, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k44wzw9q5zv-en
  20. 20.
    OECD (2013) OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013. OECD, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    OECD (2015) Frascati Manual 2015: guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development. The measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities. OECD Publishing, Paris, http://oe.cd/frascati
  22. 22.
    OECD/Eurostat (2018) Oslo Manual 2018: guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation, 4th edn. The measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities. OECD Publishing, Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
  23. 23.
    Omole D (2012) Harnessing information and communication technologies (ICTs) to address urban poverty: emerging open policy lessons for the open knowledge economy. Inf Technol Dev 19(1):03–21Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Prime Minister’s Office at the UAE (2015) UAE National Innovation Strategy. Ministry of Cabinet AffairsGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    The Millennium Project (2017) 15 global challenges. Accessed on the 27.01.2019 at http://www.millennium-project.org/projects/challenges/
  26. 26.
    Todeva E (2013) Governance of innovation and intermediation in the Triple Helix interactions. Ind High Educ 27(4):263–278.  https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    UNCTAD/UNDP (2010) Creative economy: Report 2010. UN, New York. Available at http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/ditctab20103_en.pdf
  28. 28.
    Vigier, Pierre (2013) Innovation Union Competitiveness Report 2013. Presentation by Pierre Vigier, Head of Unit Economic Analysis and Indicators, European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    WEF (2019) Mapping global transformations. Innovation. World Economic Forum. Accessed on the 27.01.2019 at https://toplink.weforum.org/knowledge/insight/a1Gb0000000LrSOEA0/explore/summary
  30. 30.
    World Bank (2006) Knowledge assessment methodology (updated Mar 2006). http://www.worldbank.org/kam
  31. 31.
    World Bank (2008) Measuring knowledge in the world’s economies: knowledge assessment methodology and knowledge economy index. Knowledge4Development ProgrammeGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    World Bank Institute (2007) Building knowledge economies: advanced strategies for development. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank (WBI)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    UAE Department of Economic Development (no date) The Abu Dhabi Innovation IndexGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business and SocietySt. Mary’s UniversityTwickenhamEngland, UK

Personalised recommendations