Elinor Ostrom or the Revolution of the Commons

  • Fanny Verrax


Elinor Ostrom (1933–2012) is a revolutionary figure in the landscape of contemporary economics for several reasons. First, she is the first and still only woman ever to receive the “Nobel” Prize in Economics (or “the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel” to be entirely correct) in 2009. Secondly, she has developed innovative theoretical models that are deeply rooted in fieldwork in connection with even wider sustainability issues.


  1. Acheson, James. 2011. “Ostrom for Anthropologists.” International Journal of the Commons 5 (2): 319–39. Scholar
  2. Araral, Eduardo. 2014. “Ostrom, Hardin and the Commons: A Critical Appreciation and a Revisionist View.” Environmental Science & Policy 36 (February): 11–23. Scholar
  3. Block, Walter, and Ivan Jankovic. 2016. “Tragedy of the Partnership: A Critique of Elinor Ostrom.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 75 (2): 289–318. Scholar
  4. Blomqist, William, and Elinor Ostrom. 1985. “Institutional Capacity and the Resolution of a Commons Dilemma.” Policy Studies Review 5 (2): 383–93.Google Scholar
  5. Buchanan, James. 1977. “The Samaritan’s Dilemma.” In Freedom in Constitutional Contract, by James Buchanan, 169–80. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, Richmond. 1985. Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  7. Costanza, Robert, Bobbi Low, Elinor Ostrom, and James Wilson. 2000. Institutions, Ecosystems, and Sustainability. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  8. Cox, Michael, Gwen Arnold, and Sergio Villamayor Tomás. 2010. “A Review of Design Principles for Community-Based Natural Resource Management.” Ecology and Society 15 (4).
  9. Dresher, Melvin. 1981. The Mathematics of Games of Strategy. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Forsythe, Robert, Joel L. Horowitz, N. E. Savin, and Martin Sefton. 1994. “Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments.” Games and Economic Behavior 6 (3): 347–69. Scholar
  11. Gibson, Clark C., Krister Andersson, Elinor Ostrom, The late Elinor Ostrom, and Sujai Shivakumar. 2005. The Samaritan’s Dilemma: The Political Economy of Development Aid. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hardin, Garrett. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162 (3859): 1243–48.
  13. Hess, Charlotte, and Elinor Ostrom. 2007. Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hobbes, Thomas. 2004. De Cive. Whitefish: Kessinger Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Kahneman, Daniel. 2003. “Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics.” The American Economic Review 93 (5): 1449–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuhn, Steven. 2017. “The Prisoner’s Dilemma.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  17. Levi, Margaret. 1989. Of Rule and Revenue. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Malthus, T. R. 1992. An Essay on the Principle of Population. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Netting, Robert M. 1976. “What Alpine Peasants Have in Common: Observations on Communal Tenure in a Swiss Village.” Human Ecology 4 (2): 135–46. Scholar
  20. Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2009. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ostrom, Elinor, Thomas Dietz, Nives Dolsak, Paul C. Stern, Susan Stonich, and Elke U. Weber. 2002. The Drama of the Commons. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ostrom, Elinor, Roy Gardner, James Walker, and Jimmy Walker. 1994. Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ostrom, Elinor, and Vincent Ostrom. 2014. Choice, Rules and Collective Action: The Ostrom’s on the Study of Institutions and Governance. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  26. Polanyi, Mihály. 1951. The Logic of Liberty. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  27. Ruddle, Kenneth. 1996. “Back to First Principles: Clearly Defined Boundaries.” SPC Traditional Marine Resource Management and Knowledge Information Bulletin 6: 4–12.Google Scholar
  28. Whitehead, Alfred North. 1938. Science and the Modern World. Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fanny Verrax
    • 1
  1. 1.LyonFrance

Personalised recommendations