Advertisement

The just in Time Application in the Surgical Box Supply Chain Management

  • Annibal Scavarda
  • Gláucya DaúEmail author
  • Rachna Shah
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

The surgical box supply chain management can be problematic through the surgical scheduling without an effective management control of the forecast, the stock, and the pulled demand. This research study analyzes just in time application with the use of the Kanban in the surgical box supply chain management. The researchers realized this study between December 2016 and July 2018. The main objective of the study is to apply the just in time as a management tool for the surgical boxes. The research has two periods: the observational and the tool management adoptions analysis periods. The results section presents three subsections: “the inventory,” “the integration among software, systems, and people,” and the “participative management.” The discussion brings two stages named: “the first stage-structuring the just in time delivery” and “the second stage-the just in time delivery.” The authors conclude that the supply chain can be dynamic and customized. The mass customization can be inserted and the industry can bring contributions with new opportunities like the Kanban to implement the just in time application.

Keywords

Just in time Supply chain management Surgical box 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present study was developed at the Health Economic and Technological Evaluation Laboratory of the Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro. The authors would like to acknowledge the support from the Rio de Janeiro State Foundation for Research Support, the Brazilian Network for Evaluation of Health Technologies, and the Brazilian National Scientific and Technological Development Council (Grant Number 3131812014-4).

References

  1. 1.
    Acquaye, A., Ibn-Mohammed, T., Genovese, A., Afrifa, G.A., Yamoah, F.A., Oppon, E.: A quantitative model for environmentally sustainable supply chain performance measurement. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 269, 188–205 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brabazon, P.G., MacCarthy, B., Woodcock, A., Hawkins, R.W.: Mass customization in the automotive industry production and operations management. Prod. Oper. Manag. Soc. 19(5), 489–502 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruce, M., Daly, L.: Lean or agile: a solution for supply chain management in the textiles and clothing industry? Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 24(2), 151–170 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cattani, K.D., Dahan, E., Schmidt, G.M.: Lowest cost may not lower total cost: using “spackling” to smooth mass-customized production. Prod. Oper. Manag. 19(5), 531–545 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Delmonico, D., Jabbour, C.J.C., Pereira, S.C.F., Jabbour, A.B.L.S., Renwick, D.W.S., Thomé, A.M.T.: Unveiling barriers to sustainable public procurement in emerging economies: evidence from a leading sustainable supply chain initiative in Latin America. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 134, 70–79 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ding, H., Huang, H., Tang, O.: Sustainable supply chain collaboration with outsourcing pollutant reduction service in power industry. J. Clean. Prod. 186, 215–228 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gualandris, J., Kalchschmidt, M.: Customer pressure and innovativeness: their role in sustainable supply chain management. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 20, 92–103 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hicks, C., McGovern, T., Prior, G., Smith, I.: Applying lean principles to the design of healthcare facilities. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 170, 677–686 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jakhar, S.K.: Performance evaluation and a flow allocation decision model for a sustainable supply chain of an apparel industry. J. Clean. Prod. 87, 391–413 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Juran Institute: The Juran Trilogy. Available at https://www.juran.com/webinars/the-juran-trilogy. Accessed 25 Aug 2018
  11. 11.
    Kolberg, D., Zühlke, D.: Lean Automation enabled by Industry 4.0 Technologies. IFAC-Papers OnLine 48(3), 1870–1875 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Machado, C.M.L., Scavarda, A., Vaccaro, G.: Lean healthcare supply chain management: minimizing waste and costs. Indep. J. Manag. Prod. (IJM&P) 5(4) (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Man, J.C., Strandhagen, J.O.: An Industry 4.0 research agenda for sustainable business models. Procedia CIRP 63, 721–726 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meixell, M.J., Luoma, P.: Stakeholder pressure in sustainable supply chain management: a systematic review. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 45(1/2), 69–89 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mustaffa, N.H., Potter, A.: Healthcare supply chain management in Malaysia: a case study. Supply Chain. Manag.: Int. J. 14(3), 234–243 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Padhi, S.S., Pati, R.K., Rajeev, A.: Framework for selecting sustainable supply chain processes and industries using an integrated approach. J. Clean. Prod. 184, 969–984 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turcu, C.E., Turcu, C.O.: Internet of things as key enabler for sustainable healthcare delivery. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 73, 251–256 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Goh, M.: Moderating the role of firm size in sustainable performance improvement through sustainable supply chain management. Sustainability 10, 1654 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Production Engineering SchoolFederal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro—UNIRIORio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Health Economic and Technological Evaluation LaboratoryFederal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro—UNIRIORio de JaneiroBrazil
  3. 3.Supply Chain and Operations Department, Carlson School of ManagementUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations