Advertisement

Water Distribution for Victims of Drought: The Case of the Brazilian Semi-arid Region

  • Yesus Emmanuel Medeiros Vieira
  • Renata Albergaria de Mello BandeiraEmail author
  • Luiz Antônio Silveira Lopes
  • Leandro de Oliveira Silva
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

This paper proposes a procedure and a computational tool for helping the decision-making process regarding the water supply for beneficiaries in regions affected by drought, considering the transport and routing of water distribution. The proposed procedure was applied to a real case scenario in the Brazilian semi-arid region.

Keywords

Drought Disasters Operations management 

References

  1. 1.
    Alpino, T.A., Sena, A.R.M.D., Freitas, C.M.D.: Disasters related to droughts and public health–a review of the scientific literature. Ciencia & saude coletiva, 21(3), 809–820 (2016). https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015213.21392015
  2. 4.
    Brasil.: Inteministerial Ordinance n.1, July 25, 2012. Provides for the mutual technical and financial cooperation between the Ministries of National Integration and defense to carry out complementary actions to support the distribution of drinking water to the populations affected by drought and drought in the semi-arid region of the Northeast and the night region of the States of Mina Gerais and Espírito Santo, called Operação Carro Pipa. Diário Oficial da União, July 25, 2012. Acesso em 26/04/2018Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    CEPED UFSC.: Drought and drought in Brazil—know the data, References and other information (2015). Available in: http://www.ceped.ufsc.br/seca-e-estiagem-no-brasil-conheca-os-dados-ate-2012
  4. 5.
    CGE.: Desertification, land degradation and drought in Brazil—Brasília—Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos, p. 252. CGEE, Brasilia, DF (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Clark, G., Wright, J.W.: Scheduling of vehicles from a central deport to a number of delivery points. Oper. Res. 12, 568–581 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 2.
    Gutiérrez, A.P.A. et al.: Drought preparedness in Brazil. Weather Clim. Extremes 3, 95–106 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    International Emergency Disasters Database (EM-DAT).: The International Disaster Database [internet]. Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters-CRED. [acessado 2018 jul 26]. Disponível em: http://www.emdat.be/database
  8. 10.
    Kunz, N., Reiner, G.: A meta-analysis of humanitarian logistics research. J. Humanitarian Logistics Supply Chain Manag. 2(2), 116–147 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 8.
    Long, D.C., Wood, D.F.: The logistics of famine relief. J. Bus. Logistics 16(1), 213–230 (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    Mendonca, D., Beroggi, G.E.G., van Gent, D., Wallace, W.A.: Designing gaming simulations for the assessment of group decision support systems in emergency response. Saf. Sci. 44(6), 523–535 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Natarajarathinam, M., Capar, I., Narayanan, A.: Managing supply chains in times of crisis: a review of literature and insights. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logistics Manag. 39(7), 535–573 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pereira, L.S., Cordery, I., Iacovides, I.: Coping with water scarcity. IHP-VI, Technical Documents in Hidrology, p. 58. UNESCO, Paris (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stanke, C., et al.: Health effects of drought: a systematic review of the evidence. PLOS Curr. Disasters (2013, June 5). edn. 1Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Travassos, I.S., Souza, B.I., Silva, A.B.: Droughts, desertification and public policies in the Brazilian Northeastern Semiarid. Revista OKARA: Geografia em Debate, vol. 7, n. 1, pp. 147–164 (2013). ISSN: 1982–3878. João Pessoa, PB. DGEOC/CCEN/UFPB. Disponível em: http://www.okara.ufpb.br. Acesso em 25 Jul. 2018
  15. 15.
    Ultramari clovis, szuchman tami.: Natural disasters: altruism, interests and opportunities. Ambient. soc. [Internet]. 2017 June [cited 2018 Sep 10]; 20(2): 1–18. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2017000200001&lng=en. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc173r2v2022017
  16. 16.
    Walter, J. (ed.): World disasters report 2004: focus on community resilience. Kumarian, Bloomfield, Connecticut (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    World Bank.: Turn down the heat: why a 4 °C warmer world must be avoided. World Bank Group, Washington DC (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zamani, G.H., Gorgievski-Duijvesteijn, M.J., Zarafshani, K.: Hum Ecol 34, 677 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-006-9034-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    UN.: Especialistas da ONU colocam crise de água entre os maiores riscos globais (2018, March 22). Retrieved July 4, 2019, from ONU News website: https://news.un.org/pt/story/2018/03/1615411

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yesus Emmanuel Medeiros Vieira
    • 1
  • Renata Albergaria de Mello Bandeira
    • 1
    Email author
  • Luiz Antônio Silveira Lopes
    • 1
  • Leandro de Oliveira Silva
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto Militar de EngenhariaRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations