Advertisement

Social Lab for Sustainable Logistics: Developing Learning Outcomes in Engineering Education

  • David Ernesto Salinas-NavarroEmail author
  • Ericka Zulema Rodríguez Calvo
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

A frequent problem in the education of engineering students refers to recognizing the relevance of learning outcomes beyond curriculum or academic content. This work explores students undertaking learning experiences within a Social Lab setting related to sustainable logistics to increase their appreciation and value of studies in the discipline.

Keywords

Sustainable logistics Social Lab Engineering education 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the NOVUS 2018 initiative of Tecnologico de Monterrey.

References

  1. 1.
    Accredition Board for Engineering and Technology: Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2016–2017. Available at: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2016-2017/ (2016)
  2. 2.
    Asoke, D., et al.: Building sustainability in logistics operations: a research agenda. Manage. Res. Rev. 34(11), 1237–1259 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bakshi, B., Biksel, J.: The quality for sustainability: challenges for systems process engineering. AIChE J. 49(6), 1350–1358 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ballou, R.: Business logistics management: planning, organizing, and controlling the supply chain. Prentice Hall College Div, USA (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown, M., Lippincott, J.: Learning spaces: more than meets the eye. Educ. Q. (1), 14–16 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bruner, J.: The Relevance of Education. W. W. Norton & Company, NY (1971)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Checkland, P., Scholes, J.: Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley, Chichester, UK (1990)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Vries, W. et al.: ¿Desertores o decepcionados? Distintas causas para abandonar los estudios universitarios. Revista de la Educación Superior Vol. XL (4), No. 160 October-December: 29–49 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Vries, W., Navarro, Y. ¿Profesionistas del futuro o futuros taxistas? Los egresados universitarios y el mercado laboral en México. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior Núm. 4 Vol. II, pp. 3–27 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Espejo, R.: Requirements for effective participation in self-constructed organizations. Eur. Manage. J. 14(4), 414–422 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gardner, L.: Teaching teachers about supply chain management to influence students’ career and education choices. Decis. Sci. J. Innov. Educ. 11(2), 185–192 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gibbons, M.: Higher education relevance in the 21st century. World Bank, Washington, D.C. (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hassan, Z.: The social labs revolution. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., San Francisco, CA (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hassan, Z.: The social labs fieldbook. Version 1.0 Draft. Available at https://bluesolutions.info/images/Social-Labs-Fieldbook-D11.pdf (2015). Accessed date 15 Sept 2018
  15. 15.
    Johnson, M.E., Pike, D.: A framework for teaching supply chain management. Prod. Oper. Manage. 9(1), 2–18 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Munkácsi, A., Kasai-Ónodi, A.: Challenges and methods of the 21st century in logistics education. Some Recent Research from Economics and Business Studies. International Research Institute. Slovakia, pp. 211–222 (2018)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Observatory of Educational Innovation Tecnologico de Monterrey 2015. Challenge based learning, EduTrends, October. Available at: https://observatory.itesm.mx/edutrends-cbe. Accessed date 15 Sept
  18. 18.
    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: In-depth Analysis of the Labour Market Relevance and Outcomes of Higher Education Systems. OECD, NY (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ozelkan, E., Rajamani, D.: An effective framework for teaching supply chain management. Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. USA. Available at https://peer.asee.org/1435.pdf (2006). Accessed date 26 March 2018
  20. 20.
    Rieckmann, M.: Future oriented higher education: Which key competencies should be fostered through university teaching and learning? In: Futures, vol. 44, Issue 2, pp. 127–135. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sarder, B.: Best practices of logistics & transportation graduate education. In: 122nd ASSE Annual Conference and Exposition. American Society for Engineering Education. Seattle (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stabback, P.: Qué hace a un currículo de calidad. UNESCO, NY (2016)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thomas, H.: Learning spaces, learning environments and the dis‘placement’ of learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 41(3), 502–511 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    United Nations General Assembly: Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations Organization, NY (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Ernesto Salinas-Navarro
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ericka Zulema Rodríguez Calvo
    • 1
  1. 1.Tecnologico de MonterreyMonterreyMexico

Personalised recommendations