Advertisement

Intrinsically Motivated Autonomy in Human-Robot Interaction: Human Perception of Predictive Information in Robots

  • Marcus M. ScheunemannEmail author
  • Christoph Salge
  • Kerstin Dautenhahn
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11649)

Abstract

In this paper we present a fully autonomous and intrinsically motivated robot usable for HRI experiments. We argue that an intrinsically motivated approach based on the Predictive Information formalism, like the one presented here, could provide us with a pathway towards autonomous robot behaviour generation, that is capable of producing behaviour interesting enough for sustaining the interaction with humans and without the need for a human operator in the loop. We present a possible reactive baseline behaviour for comparison for future research. Participants perceive the baseline and the adaptive, intrinsically motivated behaviour differently. In our exploratory study we see evidence that participants perceive an intrinsically motivated robot as less intelligent than the reactive baseline behaviour. We argue that is mostly due to the high adaptation rate chosen and the design of the environment. However, we also see that the adaptive robot is perceived as more warm, a factor which carries more weight in interpersonal interaction than competence.

Keywords

Robotics Sustained interaction Human-robot interaction Autonomous human-robot interaction Robot behaviour Cognitive robotics Robot control Autonomous robots Intrinsic motivation Predictive information Information theory 

References

  1. 1.
    Adamides, G., Christou, G., Katsanos, C., Xenos, M., Hadzilacos, T.: Usability guidelines for the design of robot teleoperation: a taxonomy. IEEE Trans. Hum.-Mach. Syst. 45(2), 256–262 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2014.2371048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ay, N., Bertschinger, N., Der, R., Güttler, F., Olbrich, E.: Predictive information and explorative behavior of autonomous robots. Eur. Phys. J. B 63(3), 329–339 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2008-00175-0MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement Instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1(1), 71–81 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barto, A.G.: Intrinsic motivation and reinforcement learning. In: Baldassarre, G., Mirolli, M. (eds.) Intrinsically Motivated Learning in Natural and Artificial Systems, pp. 17–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32375-1_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blow, M., Dautenhahn, K., Appleby, A., Nehaniv, C.L., Lee, D.C.: Perception of robot smiles and dimensions for human-robot interaction design. In: ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 469–474, September 2006.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2006.314372
  6. 6.
    Carpinella, C.M., Wyman, A.B., Perez, M.A., Stroessner, S.J.: The robotic social attributes scale (RoSAS): development and validation. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction HRI 2017, pp. 254–262. ACM, New York (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020208
  7. 7.
    Cohen, J.: A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112(1), 155–159 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dautenhahn, K.: I could be you: the phenomenological dimension of social understanding. Cybern. Syst. 28(5), 417–453 (1997).  https://doi.org/10.1080/019697297126074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deci, E., Ryan, R.M.: Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Springer, New York (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Der, R., Martius, G.: The Playful Machine: Theoretical Foundation and Practical Realization of Self-Organizing Robots, Cognitive Systems Monographs, vol. 15. Springer, Berlin (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20253-7CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fukuda, H., Ueda, K.: Interaction with a moving object affects one’s perception of its animacy. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2(2), 187–193 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0045-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goodrich, M.A., Schultz, A.C.: Human-robot interaction: a survey. Found. Trends Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1(3), 203–275 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000005CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guckelsberger, C., Salge, C., Togelius, J.: New and surprising ways to be mean. In: 2018 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG), pp. 1–8 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1109/CIG.2018.8490453
  14. 14.
    Guckelsberger, C., Salge, C., Colton, S.: Intrinsically motivated general companion NPCs via coupled empowerment maximisation. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG), pp. 150–157, September 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1109/CIG.2016.7860406
  15. 15.
    Martius, G., Der, R., Ay, N.: Information driven self-organization of complex robotic behaviors. PLoS one 8(5), 1–14 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Merrick, K.E., Maher, M.L.: Motivated Reinforcement Learning. Curious Characters for Multiuser Games, 1st edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oudeyer, P.Y., Kaplan, F.: How can we define intrinsic motivation? In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Epigenetic Robotics: Modeling Cognitive Development in Robotic Systems. Lund University Cognitive Studies, Lund. LUCS, Brighton (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oudeyer, P.Y., Kaplan, F.: What is intrinsic motivation? A typology of computational approaches. Front. Neurorobotics 1, 6 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.12.006.2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ryan, R.M.: Agency and organization: Intrinsic motivation, autonomy, and the self in psychological development. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol. 40, pp. 1–56 (1993). Nebraska Symposium on MotivationGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25(1), 54–67 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scheunemann, M.M.: Intrinsically motivated autonomy in human-robot interaction: human perception of predictive information in robots (2019). https://mms.ai/TAROS2019-supplementary/. Supplementary material
  22. 22.
    Scheunemann, M.M., Dautenhahn, K., Salem, M., Robins, B.: Utilizing bluetooth low energy to recognize proximity, touch and humans. In: 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 362–367. IEEE, August 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745156

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HertfordshireHertfordshireUK
  2. 2.University of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations