Advertisement

Communicating “Success” with Research Students: Institutional Responsibilities in Encouraging a Culture of Research Higher Degree Completions

  • Mark Emmerson
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Education Research Methods book series (PSERM)

Abstract

The modern university is driven by an outcomes-based approach that stresses quality, impact and efficiency among its researchers. For newcomers still adapting to the alien lifestyle and rigorous demands of academia, such as Research Higher Degree (RHD) students, it is important that institutions are able to guide them adequately through the research journey, and to communicate not only what “research success” looks like, but also how to achieve it through information, partnerships and shared experiences. This chapter explores the important role of “communication as empowerment” in encouraging positive outcomes by enabling research students to complete their degrees with minimal problems and maximum satisfaction.

References

  1. Albion, P., & Erwee, R. (2011). Preparing for doctoral supervision at a distance: Lessons from experience. In C. Madeux, D. Gibson, B. Dodge, M. Kockler, P., Mishra, & C. Owens (Eds.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2011 (pp. 121–128). Chesapeake: Society for IT and Teacher Education (SITE).Google Scholar
  2. Conrad, L., & Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1996). Strategies for dealing with large numbers of postgraduate students. In O. Zuber-Skerrit (Ed.), Frameworks for postgraduate education (pp. 86–107). Lismore: Southern Cross University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cook, A. (2009). The roots of attrition. In A. Cook & B. Rushton (Eds.), How to recruit and retain higher education students: A handbook of good practice. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Craig, R. T. (2006). Communication as practice. In G. J. Shepherd, S. St John, & T. Striphas (Eds.), Communication as… perspectives on theory (pp. 223–231). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Deloitte Access Economics. (2011, July). Examining the full cost of research training (Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research report). Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/examining_the_full_cost_of_research_training.pdf.
  6. Denholm, C., & Evans, T. (2012). Doctorates Downunder: Keys to successful doctoral study in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. Camberwell, VIC: ACER Press.Google Scholar
  7. Eley, A., & Murray, R. (2009). How to be an effective supervisor. New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). (2015). Guide to funding 2015–16. Retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/HEFCE,2014/Content/Pubs/2015/201504/2015_04.pdf.
  9. Holmes, R. S. (1996). A successful environment and policy framework. In O. Zuber-Skerrit (Ed.), Frameworks for postgraduate education (pp. 35–47). Lismore: Southern Cross University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Laske, S., & Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1996). Frameworks for postgraduate research and supervision: An overview. In O. Zuber-Skerrit (Ed.), Frameworks for postgraduate education (pp. 10–31). Lismore: Southern Cross University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Litalien, D., & Guay, F. (2015). Dropout intentions in PhD studies: A comprehensive model based on interpersonal relationship and motivational resources. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 218–231.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sakurai, Y., Pyhältö, K., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2012). Factors affecting international doctoral students’ academic engagement, satisfaction with their studies, and dropping out. International Journal for Researcher Development, 3(2), 99–117.  https://doi.org/10.1108/17597511311316964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Semenza, G. (2010). Graduate study for the 21st century: How to build an academic career in the Humanities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Slack, J. D. (2006). Communication as articulation. In G. J. Shepherd, S. St John, & T. Striphas (Eds.), Communication as… perspectives on theory (pp. 223–231). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Smith, R. L., Maroney, K., Nelson, K., Abel, A., & Abel, H. (2006). Doctoral programs: Changing high rates of attrition. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education & Development, 45(1), 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stevens, K., & Asmar, C. (1999). Doing postgraduate research in Australia. Carlton South: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Taylor, S. E. (2012). Changes in doctoral education. International Journal for Researcher Development, 3(2), 118–138.  https://doi.org/10.1108/17597511311316973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thomson, P., & Walker, M. (2010). Doctoral education in context: The changing nature of the doctorate and doctoral students. In M. Walker & P. Thomson (Eds.), The Routledge doctoral supervisor’s companion: Supporting effective research in education and the social sciences. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Tynan, B. R., & Garbett, D. L. (2007). Negotiating the university research culture: Collaborative voices of new academics. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(4), 411–424.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701658617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wiley, D. E., & Mort, P. (2005). Inducting our PhD students: Changing the research culture and improving the student experience. In D. Radcliffe (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE/AaeE global colloquium on engineering education (pp. 766–776). Brisbane: Australasian Association of Engineering Education.Google Scholar
  21. Wright, T. R., & Cochrane, R. (2000). Factors influencing successful submission of PhD theses. Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 181–195.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070050051674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Emmerson
    • 1
  1. 1.Queensland Department of EducationToowoombaAustralia

Personalised recommendations