Economics of Advanced Small Modular Reactors

  • Bahman Zohuri
  • Patrick McDaniel


Developments in the US economy that will affect the nuclear power industry in the coming years include the emergence of new nuclear technologies, waste disposal issues, proliferation concerns, the streamlining of nuclear regulation, a possible transition to a hydrogen economy, policies toward national energy security, and environmental policy. These developments will affect both the competitiveness of nuclear power and appropriate nuclear energy policies.


  1. 1.
    Zohuri, B. 2018. Hydrogen Energy: Challenges and Solutions for a Cleaner Future. 1st ed. Springer Publishing Company, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). 2004. FY 2005 DOE Budget Request, Energy and Walter Development Approximation, Vol. 3, Nuclear Energy, pp. 395–398.
  3. 3.
    Zohuri, B. Nuclear Energy for Hydrogen Generation through Intermediate Heat Exchangers: A Renewable Source of Energy. 1st ed. Springer Publishing Company, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pannier, C.P., and R. Skoda. 2014. Comparison of Small Modular Reactor and Large Nuclear Reactor Fuel Cost. Energy and Power Engineering 6: 82–94. Scholar
  5. 5.
    The Ux Consulting Company. 2011. UxC Prices.
  6. 6.
    Locatelli, G. 2010. SMR Economics Evaluation. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Asia-Pacific Nuclear Energy Forum on Small and Medium Reactors (SMRs): Benefits and Challenges, Berkeley, 17–19 June 2010.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Preliminary data for 2017. Includes utility-scale electricity generation, which is electricity generation from power plants with at least one megawatt (or 1,000 kilowatts) of total electricity generating capacity.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jones, C., and J. Jacob III. Economical and technical considerations for combined-cycle performance-enhancement options, GE Power Systems, GER 4200, October 2000.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Langston, Lee S., and George Opdyke. 1997. Introduction to Gas Turbine for Non-Engineers, Global Gas Turbine News, Volume 37, No. 2.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jones, Chuck, and John A. Jacobs III, ‘Economic and Technical Considerations for Combined-Cycle Performance-Enhancement Options’, GE Power Systems Schenectady, NY. GER-4200.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rolf, Kehlhofer, Frank Hannemann, Franz Stirnimann, and Bert Rukes. 2009. Combined-Cycle Gas & Steam Turbine Power Plants. 3rd ed. PennWell Publication.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thomas, S. Bradford, Froggatt, A., and Milborrow, D., “The Economics of Nuclear Power” Research Report 2007.
  13. 13.
    Zohuri, B., and McDaniel, P. “Combined Cycle Driven Efficiency for Next Generation Nuclear Power Plants: An Innovative Design Approach” Dec 8, 2017, Published by Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zohuri, B. 2018. Small Modular Reactors as Renewable Energy Sources. Springer Publishing Company, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    An Interdisciplinary MIT Study ‘The Future of Nuclear Power’, MIT, ISBN 0-615-12420-8, 2003.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Platt’s Nuclear News Flashes, 8 March 2005.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Generation IV International Forum (GIF), ‘A technology roadmap for Generation IV nuclear energy systems’ NERAC Review Version, September 2002.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nuclear power’s role in generating electricity. US Congressional Budget Office: May 2008. Quoted in Ingersoll, D. T. “Small Modular Reactors, Nuclear Power Fad or Future,” Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy, Number 90, Cambridge, UK, 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bahman Zohuri
    • 1
  • Patrick McDaniel
    • 2
  1. 1.Electrical and Computer Engineering DepartmentUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA
  2. 2.Chemical and Nuclear Engineering DepartmentUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations