Advertisement

Civil-Military Cooperation in the Mediterranean Sea: Lessons Not Learnt

  • Hernan del Valle
Chapter

Abstract

Between 2014 and 2018, several NGOs ran Search and Rescue (SAR) operations in the Mediterranean. Cooperating effectively with European naval assets, NGOs saved more than 110,000 asylum seekers and migrants from drowning at sea. Since 2017, however, European authorities grew increasingly wary of non-governmental SAR operations. As anti-immigration forces gained ground in European politics, the political imperative of stemming irregular entries into the EU led European governments to criminalise not only human smuggling, but also humanitarian activities. The criminalization of NGOs rescuing migrants undermined civil-military cooperation and dismantled an effective operation which had a critical role in reducing mortality at sea.

References

  1. Acosta, A., & Wiesbrock, A. (Eds.). (2015). Global Migration: Old Assumptions, New Dynamics. Denver: Praeger.Google Scholar
  2. Arsenijevic, J., Manzi, M., & Zachariah, R. (2017). Defending Humanity at Sea. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) Operational Research Unit (LuxOr). http://searchandrescue.msf.org/assets/uploads/files/170831-%20Report_Analysis_SAR_Final.pdf.
  3. Baird, T. (2017). Carrier Sanctions in Europe: A Comparison of Trends in 10 Countries. European Journal of Migration and Law, 19(3), 307–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bigo, D. (1994). The European Internal Security Field: Stakes and Rivalries in a Newly Developing Area of Police Intervention. In M. Anderson & M. den Boer (Eds.), Policing Across National Boundaries (pp. 161–173). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  5. Bourbeau, P. (2015). Migration, Resilience and Security: Responses to New Inflows of Asylum Seekers and Migrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(12), 1958–1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crawley, H., Duvell, F., Jones, K., McMahon, S., & Sigona, N. (2016). Destination Europe? Understanding the Dynamics and Drivers of Mediterranean Migration (MEDMIG Project Final Report). http://www.medmig.info/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/research-brief-destination-europe.pdf. Accessed 21 March 2019.
  7. Crepeau, F. (2015). From Enforced Closure to Regulated Mobility (RCIS Working Paper No. 2015/4).Google Scholar
  8. Cusumano, E. (2017). Straightjacketing Migrant Rescuers? The Code of Conduct on Maritime NGOs. Mediterranean Politics, 24(1), 106–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cusumano, E. (2019). Migrant Rescue as Organized Hypocrisy: EU Maritime Missions Offshore Libya Between Humanitarianism and Border Control. Cooperation and Conflict, 54(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cusumano, E., & Pattison, J. (2018). The Non-governmental Provision of Search and Rescue in the Mediterranean and the Abdication of State Responsibility. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 31(1), 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. del Valle, H. (2016). Search and Rescue in the Mediterranean Sea: Negotiating Political Differences. Humanitarianism and the Migration Crisis, Refugee Survey Quarterly, 35(2), 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. EU Commission. (2015, November 24). EU-Turkey Cooperation: A €3 Billion Refugee Facility for Turkey. Brussels: Press Release.Google Scholar
  13. EU Commission. (2016, September 8). EU Announces More Projects Under the Facility for Refugees in Turkey: €348 Million in Humanitarian Aid to Refugees in Turkey, Brussels.Google Scholar
  14. EU Council. (2016, June 20). Extension and Expansion of EUNAVFOR MED Operation Sophia Mandate.Google Scholar
  15. EUBAM Mandate (2013 and 2015). Council Decision 2013/233/CFSP of 22 May 2013 on the European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya (EUBAM Libya) (OJ L 138, 24.5.2013, p. 15) and Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/2276 of 7 December 2015 amending and extending Decision 2013/233/CFSP on the European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya (EUBAM Libya) (OJ L 322, 8.12.2015, p. 51).Google Scholar
  16. Euronews. (2017). Italy’s Code of Conduct for NGOs Involved in Migrant Rescue: Text. https://www.euronews.com/2017/08/03/text-of-italys-code-of-conduct-for-ngos-involved-in-migrant-rescue. Accessed 21 March 2019.
  17. European Commission. (2017, July 6). A Strategic Approach to Resilience in the EU’s External Action. Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council, Brussels.Google Scholar
  18. Faist, T. (1995). Boundaries of Welfare States: Immigrants and Social Rights in the National and Supranational Level. In R. Miles & D. Thranhardt (Eds.), Migration and European Integration: The Dynamics of Inclusion and Exclusion (pp. 177–195). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  19. France24. (2015, November 19). Paris Attack Terrorists Used Refugee Chaos to Enter France, Says PM Valls. https://www.france24.com/en/20151119-paris-attackers-slip-refugee-migrant-crisis-terrorism. Accessed 21 March 2019.
  20. Frontex—European Border and Coast Guard Agency. Risk Analysis F.Google Scholar
  21. Guardian. (2017, February 27). NGO Rescues off Libya Encourage Traffickers, Says EU Border Chief.Google Scholar
  22. Heller, C., & Pezzani, L. (2016). Death by Rescue. Forensic Architecture Agency.Google Scholar
  23. Heller, C., & Pezzani, L. (2017). Blaming the Rescuers. Forensic Architecture Agency.Google Scholar
  24. Huysmans, J. (2000). The European Union and the Securitization of Migration. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(5), 751–777.Google Scholar
  25. International Organization for Migration (IOM). (undated). Missing Migrants Project Data. https://missingmigrants.iom.int/region/mediterranean. Accessed 21 March 2019.
  26. Landau, L. (2018). A Chronotope of Containment Development: Europe’s Migrant Crisis and Africa’s Reterritorialisation. Antipode, 51(1), 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lentin, A. (2008). Europe and the Silence About Race. European Journal of Social Theory, 11(4), 487–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Menz, G. (2011). Neo-Liberalism, Privatization and the Outsourcing of Migration Management: A Five-Country Comparison. Competition & Change, 15(2), 116–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matthijs, K., Neels, K., Timmermann, C., Haers, J., & Mels, S. (Eds.). (2015). Population Change in Europe, the Middle-East and North Africa: Beyond the Demographic Divide. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  30. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF). (2009). Speech by MSF President Christophe Fournier at NATO’s Allied Rapid Reaction Corps Conference, Rheindahlen, Germany. https://www.msf.org/nato-speech-christophe-fournier. Accessed 21 March 2019.
  31. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF). (2016). MSF to No Longer Take Funds from EU Member States and Institutions.Google Scholar
  32. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF). (2018a, September 23). Italian Government Pressures Panama to Stop Aquarius’ Rescues on World’s Deadliest Maritime Route. MSF Press Release.Google Scholar
  33. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF). (2018b). Sinister Attacks by Italian Authorities on Life Saving Search and Rescue in the Mediterranean.Google Scholar
  34. NATO. (2012). CIMIC Field Handbook (4th Edition, 2016), Civil Military Cooperation Centre of Excellence (CCOE). Available at: https://www.cimic-coe.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/06/CFHB-4-0-CONTENT-1-5-E-Book-2.pdf (last accessed, June 2019).
  35. NATO—North Atlantic Treaty Organization. (2018). Resilience and Article 3.Google Scholar
  36. Papademetriou, D. (Ed.). (2006). Europe and Its Immigrants in the 21st Century: A New Deal or a Continuing Dialogue of the Deaf? Washington, DC and Lisbon: Migration Policy Institute and Luso-American Foundation.Google Scholar
  37. Powell, C. (2001, October 26). Remarks to the National Foreign Policy Conference for Leaders of Nongovernmental Organizations. National Foreign Policy Conference for Leaders of Nongovernmental Organizations, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  38. Reuters. (2016, June 17). MSF Spurns EU Funding Over ‘Shameful’ Turkey Migrant Deal.Google Scholar
  39. Reuters. (2017, February). Italian Court Investigates Whether Smugglers Finance Rescue Boats.Google Scholar
  40. Rodenhäuser, T. (2014). Another Brick in the Wall: Carrier Sanctions and the Privatization of Immigration Control. International Journal of Refugee Law, 26(2), 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. RT France. (2018). Les jeunes du Rassemblement National (ex-FN) et de la Ligue italienne unis contre la «submersion migratoire».Google Scholar
  42. Rudge, P. (1989). European Initiatives on Asylum. In D. Joly & R. Cohen (Eds.), Reluctant Hosts—Europe and Its Refugees. Avebury: Aldershot.Google Scholar
  43. Scholten, S. (2015). The Privatisation of Immigration Control Through Carrier Sanctions: The Role of Private Transport Companies in Dutch and British Immigration Control. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Steinhilper, E., & Gruijters, R. (2018). A Contested Crisis: Policy Narratives and Empirical Evidence on Border Deaths in the Mediterranean. Sociology, 52(3), 515–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). (2018). Desperate Journeys: Refugees and Migrants Arriving in Europe and at Europe’s Borders.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hernan del Valle
    • 1
  1. 1.Harvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations