Digital Volunteers in Disaster Response: Accessibility Challenges

  • Jaziar Radianti
  • Terje GjøsæterEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11573)


The emergence of the Digital Humanitarian Volunteer (DHV) movements when disaster strikes have drawn the attention of researchers and practitioners in the emergency management and humanitarian domain. While there are established players in this rapidly developing field, there are still unresolved challenges, including accessibility of their digital tools and platforms. The purposes of this paper are twofold. First, it describes the background, impact and future potential of the DHV movement, and discusses the importance of universal design for the digital tools and platforms used for crowdsourcing of crisis information. Second, this paper shows how lack of concern for universal design and accessibility can have significant negative impact on the practical use of these tools, not only for people with disabilities, but also for anyone and in particular the DHVs who may be affected by situational disabilities in the field in an emergency situation. The insights from the findings serve as feedback on how to improve digital humanitarian response by broadening the base of potential volunteers as well as making the related tools and platforms more reliably usable in the field.


Crisis mapping Digital humanitarian volunteer Crowdsourcing Accessibility 


  1. 1.
    Crowley, J.: Connecting grassroots and government for disaster response. Commons Lab, Wilson Center (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alexander, D.: Globalization of disaster: trends, problems and dilemmas. J. Int. Affairs 59, 1–22 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferris, E.: Megatrends and the future of humanitarian action. Int. Rev. Red Cross 93, 915–938 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dymon, U.J., Winter, N.L.: Emergency mapping in grassroots America: a derailment evacuation case study. Geoforum 22, 377–389 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meier, P.: Crisis mapping in action: how open source software and global volunteer networks are changing the world, one map at a time. J. Map Geogr. Libr. 8, 89–100 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haworth, B.: Emergency management perspectives on volunteered geographic information: opportunities, challenges and change. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 57, 189–198 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ziemke, J.: Crisis mapping: the construction of a new interdisciplinary field? J. Map Geogr. Libr. 8, 101–117 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Whittaker, J., McLennan, B., Handmer, J.: A review of informal volunteerism in emergencies and disasters: definition, opportunities and challenges. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 13, 358–368 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sandvik, K.B.: The humanitarian cyberspace: shrinking space or an expanding frontier? Third World Q. 37, 17–32 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Plantin, J.C.: The politics of mapping platforms: participatory radiation mapping after the Fukushima Daiichi disaster. Media Cult. Soc. 37, 904–921 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    White, J.I., Palen, L.: Participatory mapping for disaster preparedness: the development & standardization of animal evacuation maps. In: Palen, L.A., Comes, T., Buscher, M., Hughes, A.L., Palen, L.A. (eds.) 12th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, ISCRAM 2015, pp. 214–224. Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, ISCRAM (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hung, K.-C., Kalantari, M., Rajabifard, A.: Methods for assessing the credibility of volunteered geographic information in flood response: a case study in Brisbane, Australia. Appl. Geogr. 68, 37–47 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Phillips, J.: Exploring the citizen-driven response to crisis in cyberspace, risk and the need for resilience. In: 2015 IEEE Canada International Humanitarian Technology Conference (IHTC 2015), pp. 1–6 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meier, P.: New information technologies and their impact on the humanitarian sector. Int. Rev. Red Cross 93, 1239–1263 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haklay, M., Singleton, A., Parker, C.: Web mapping 2.0: the neogeography of the GeoWeb. Geogr. Compass 2, 2011–2039 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hudson-Smith, A., Crooks, A., Gibin, M., Milton, R., Batty, M.: NeoGeography and Web 2.0: concepts, tools and applications. J. Location Based Serv. 3, 118–145 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rana, S., Joliveau, T.: NeoGeography: an extension of mainstream geography for everyone made by everyone? J. Location Based Serv. 3, 75–81 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Turner, A.: Introduction to neogeography. O’Reilly, Sebastopol (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baker, N.: Weed-at talk at the library. In: Brook, J., Carlsson, C., Peters, N.J. (eds.) Reclaiming San Francisco: History, Politics, Culture, pp. 35–50. City Lights Publishers (1998)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goodchild, M.F., Glennon, J.A.: Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: a research frontier. Int. J. Digit. Earth 3, 231–241 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meier, P., Brodock, K.: Crisis Mapping Kenya’s Election Violence: Comparing Mainstream News, Citizen Journalism and Ushahidi. Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, HHI. Harvard University, Boston (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Middleton, S.E., Zielinski, A., Necmioǧlu, Ö., Hammitzsch, M.: Spatio-temporal decision support system for natural crisis management with TweetComP1. In: Dargam, F., et al. (eds.) EWG-DSS 2013. LNBIP, vol. 184, pp. 11–21. Springer, Cham (2014). Scholar
  23. 23.
    Simon, T., Goldberg, A., Adini, B.: Socializing in emergencies—a review of the use of social media in emergency situations. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 35, 609–619 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cameron, M.A., Power, R., Robinson, B., Yin, J.: Emergency situation awareness from Twitter for crisis management. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 695–698. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mendoza, M., Poblete, B., Castillo, C.: Twitter under crisis: can we trust what we RT? In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics, Washington D.C., District of Columbia, pp. 71–79. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Terpstra, T., de Vries, A., Stronkman, R., Paradies, G.: Towards a realtime Twitter analysis during crises for operational crisis management. Simon Fraser University (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Imran, M., Castillo, C., Lucas, J., Meier, P., Vieweg, S.: AIDR: artificial intelligence for disaster response. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, Seoul, Korea, pp. 159–162. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lynch, M., Freelon, D., Aday, S.: Syria’s socially mediated civil war. United States Institute of Peace, vol. 91, pp. 1–35 (2014)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Coletto, M., et al.: Sentiment-enhanced Multidimensional Analysis of Online Social Networks: Perception of the Mediterranean Refugees Crisis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.01895 (2016)
  30. 30.
    Starbird, K.: Digital volunteerism during disaster: crowdsourcing information processing. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Starbird, K., Palen, L.: Voluntweeters: self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 1071–1080. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Madry, S.: The emerging world of crowd sourcing, social media, citizen science, and remote support operations in disasters. In: Madry, S. (ed.) Space Systems for Disaster Warning, Response, and Recovery. SSD, pp. 117–121. Springer, New York (2015). Scholar
  33. 33.
    Barbier, G., Zafarani, R., Gao, H., Fung, G., Liu, H.: Maximizing benefits from crowdsourced data. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 18, 257–279 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    UNOOSA: Space-based information for crowdsource mapping Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (2011)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Meier, P.: Next generation humanitarian computing. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, p. 1573. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gralla, E., Goentzel, J., de Walle, B.: Understanding the information needs of field-based decision-makers in humanitarian response to sudden onset disasters. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM), pp. 1–7 (2015)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kuusisto, T., Kuusisto, R., Yliniemi, T.: Information needs of strategic level decision-makers in crisis situations. In: ECIW, pp. 187–194 (2005)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gjøsæter, T., Radianti, J., Chen, W.: Universal design of ICT for emergency management. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) UAHCI 2018. LNCS, vol. 10907, pp. 63–74. Springer, Cham (2018). Scholar
  39. 39.
    Radianti, J., Gjøsæter, T., Chen, W.: Universal design of information sharing tools for disaster risk reduction. In: Murayama, Y., Velev, D., Zlateva, P. (eds.) ITDRR 2017. IAICT, vol. 516, pp. 81–95. Springer, Cham (2019). Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gjøsæter, T., Radianti, J.: Evaluating accessibility and usability of an experimental situational awareness room. In: Di Bucchianico, G. (ed.) AHFE 2018. AISC, vol. 776, pp. 216–228. Springer, Cham (2019). Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tunold, S., Gjøsæter, T., Chen, W., Radianti, J.: Perceivability of Map Information for Disaster Situations HCII 2019, Orlando, Florida, USA. Springer, Cham (2019, in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AgderGrimstadNorway
  2. 2.Oslo Metropolitan UniversityOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations