Advertisement

A Literature Review of the Research on Take-Over Situation in Autonomous Driving

  • Xin XinEmail author
  • Min Zhao
  • Moli Zhou
  • Siyao Lu
  • Yishan Liu
  • Daisong Guan
  • Qianyi Wang
  • Yuezhou Zhang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11585)

Abstract

In order to understand driver’s response time from automatic driving to manual driving and driving behavior after taking over in the complex traffic environment, and influencing factors of driver’s driving switching process, this paper systematically combs the common experimental situations in the research of the take-over situation in autonomous driving, and analyzes the characteristics of the take-over situation, driver’s behavior characteristic, take-over time and driving performance. We hope in the future, autonomous driving take-over procedure could balance safety and experience for drivers.

Keywords

Autonomous driving Take-over Situational awareness Driving behavior Driving workload 

References

  1. 1.
    Salmon, P.M., Regan, M.A., Johnston, I.: Human Error and Road Transport: Phase One – Literature Review. Highway Safety (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    SAE On-road Automated Vehicle Standards Committee: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems. SAE, Warrendale (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    《Road Traffic Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China》, Chap. II Sect. 2 Motor Vehicle Drivers (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Editorial Department of China Journal of Highway and Transport: Review on China’s Automotive Engineering Research Progress: 2017. China J. Highw. Transp. 30(6), 1–197 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Radlmayr, J., Gold, C., Lorenz, L., Farid, M., Bengler, K.: How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 2063–2067 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Russell, H.E.B., Harbott, L.K., Nisky, I., Pan, S., Okamura, A.M., Gerdes, J.C.: Motor learning affects car-to-driver handover in automated vehicles. Sci. Robot. 1(1), 1–10 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, Y.: Audi new A8 defining the future—analyzing Audi’s new generation A8 autopilot technology. World Automob. 09, 30–37 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Radlmayr, J., Gold, C., Lorenz, L., Farid, M., Bengler, K.: How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58th Annual Meeting, pp. 2063–2067. SAGE Publications (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gold, C., Dambock, D., Lorenz, L., Bengler, K.: “Take Over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 1938–1942. SAGE Publications (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Strand, N., Nilsson, J., Karlsson, M.A., Nilsson, L.: Semi-automated versus highly automated driving in critical situations caused by automation failures. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 27, 218–228 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lu, G., Zhao, P., Wang, Z., Lin, Q.: Impact of visual secondary task on young drivers’ take-over time in automated driving. China J. High. Transp. 31(04), 165–171 (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maurer, M., Gerdes, J.C., Lenz, B., Winner, H.: Autonomes Fahren: Technische, rechtliche und gesellschaftliche Aspekte. Springer Vieweg, Heidelberg (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45854-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hillel, A.B., Lerner, R., Levi, D., Raz, G.: Recent progress in road and lane detection: a survey. Mach. Vis. Appl. 25(3), 727–745 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meyer, G., Beiker, S.: [HRSG]: Road Vehicle Automation. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05990-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ziegler, J., et al.: Making Bertha drive—an autonomous journey on a historic route. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 6(2), 8–20 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1109/mits.2014.2306552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kuehn, M., Vogelpohl, T., Vollrath, M.: Takeover times in highly automated driving (level 3). In: 25th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Feng, C., Wanyan, X., Chen, H., Zhuang, D.: Situation awareness model based on multi-resource load theory and its application. J. Beijing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut. 44(07), 1438–1446 (2018)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang, Y.: Research on Human-Machine Interaction Strategy Design of Automated Driving Take-over System Based on User Experience, pp. 21–30. South China University of Technology (2018)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jamson, A., Meratn, N., Carsten, O., et al.: Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions. J. Transp. Res. Part C 30(5), 116–125 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Niu, J., Zhang, X., Sun, Y., Qin, H.: Analysis of the driving behavior during the takeover of automatic driving vehicles in dangerous traffic situations. China J. High. Transp. 31(06), 272–280 (2018)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Happee, R., Gold, C., Radlmayr, J., et al.: Take-over performance in evasive manoeuvres. J. Accid. Anal. Prev. 106, 211–222 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Coughlin, J., Reimer, B., Mehler, B.: Driver Wellness, Safety & the Development of an Aware Car. AgeLab, Boston (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Merat, N., Jamson, A., Lai, F., et al.: Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state. J. Hum. Factors 54(5), 762–771 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eriksson, A., Stanton, N., Davis, K.: Takeover time in highly automated vehicles: noncritical transitions to and from manual control. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 59(4), 689–705 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zeeb, K., Buchner, A., Schrauf, M.: Is take over time all that maters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving. J. Accid. Anal. Prev. 92, 230–239 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Seppelt, B., Lee, J.: Making Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) limits visible. J. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 65(3), 192–205 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xin Xin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Min Zhao
    • 2
  • Moli Zhou
    • 2
  • Siyao Lu
    • 1
  • Yishan Liu
    • 1
  • Daisong Guan
    • 2
  • Qianyi Wang
    • 1
  • Yuezhou Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.Beijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Baidu.com, Inc.BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations