Advertisement

Working with Asian Families, Infants, and Young Children

  • Kenichiro Okano
Chapter

Abstract

Given the vastness of the Asian continent, there is an enormous variety of cultures, languages, and practices not only between countries, but within countries like China, Russia, and India. The chapter addresses “in depth” the questions related to interdependence and connectedness between family members. The traditional practices in Japan are emphasized as an example of something that may be common to many Asian cultures: “living for others” while attempting also to live for oneself. Family relationships in traditional Japan emphasize paying attention to the needs of parents, siblings, and other family members, duty, filial piety, and interdependence, rather than self-reliance and individuation. The advantages and disadvantages of this are described emphasizing their clinical implications. Individuals learn very early on to please others and to monitor the mental state of parents and other relatives. Shame and saving face are important concerns, as a family may lose prestige if one of the members commits transgressions of often unspoken rules. There is a constant fear of offending others and to preserve harmony above all. This has very important consequences for the types of psychopathology observed in highly “filial” cultures and for the parenting practices that are commonly observed. Parents emphasize shame and guilt, rather than actual punishments, and children are eager to make their parents happy and proud. Open conflict is discouraged and more subtle messages are interpreted between parents and even very young children. Some culture-bound syndromes associated with the fear of shame and offending are briefly discussed, like taijin kyofusho, osmophobia, and hikikomori.

Keywords

Interdependence Losing face Amaé Misophobia Osmophobia Hikikomori Taijin kyofusho “Smelling the air” Fear of bragging Turning inward Shaming Interpersonal guilt Ancestor worship 

References

  1. Balint, M. (1936). The final goal of psycho-analytic treatment. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 17, 206–216.Google Scholar
  2. Behrens, K. Y. (2004). A multifaceted view of the concept of amae: Reconsidering the indigenous Japanese concept of relatedness. Human Development, 47(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benedict, R. (1946). The chrysanthemum and the sword: Patterns of Japanese culture. Oxford: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  4. Bornstein, M. H. (1989). Cross-cultural developmental comparisons: The case of Japanese-American infant and mother activities and interactions. What we know, what we need to know, and why we need to know. Developmental Review, 9(2), 171–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bornstein, M. H., & Cote, L. R. (2001). Mother-infant interaction and acculturation: I. Behavioural comparisons in Japanese American and South American families. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25(6), 549–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chao, R. and Tseng, V. (2002). “Parenting of Asians,” in Handbook of Parenting, M. H. Bornstein, Ed., vol. 4 of Social Conditions and Applied Parenting, pp. 59–93, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2002.Google Scholar
  7. Cho, N. (2002). “Amaé” and “Amayakashi” in mother-child relationship and the issue of independence in youth. Paper Presented at Japan Society of Youth and Adolescent Psychology.Google Scholar
  8. Doi, T. (1972). The anatomy of dependence: The key analysis of Japanese behavior (J. Bester, English Trans., 2nd ed.). Tokyo: Kodansha International.Google Scholar
  9. Elder, A., Gosling, R., & Stewart, H. (2003). In M. Balint (Ed.), Introduction (pp. 15–20). Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Ferenczi, S. (1931). Child-analysis in the analysis of adults. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 12, 468–482.Google Scholar
  11. Ferenczi, S. (1949). Confusion of the Tongues Between the Adults and the Child - The Language of Tenderness and of Passion. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 30, 225–230.Google Scholar
  12. Guedj-Bourdiau, M. J. (2011). Claustration à domicile de l’adolescent. Hikikomori [Being house-bound in adolescents]. Annales Medico Psychologiques, 169, 668–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Henshall, K. (1999). Dimensions of Japanese society: Gender, margins and mainstream. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holloway, S. D. (2010). Women and family in contemporary Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holloway, S. D., & Nagase, A. (2014). Child rearing in Japan. In H. Seline (Ed.), Parenting across cultures. Child-rearing, motherhood and fatherhood in non-Western cultures (pp. 59–75). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Isaac, R., Annie, I. K., & Prashanth, H. R. (2014). Parenting in India. In Parenting across cultures (pp. 39–45). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Iwase, M., Nakao, K., Takaishi, J., Yorifuji, K., Ikezawa, K., & Takeda, M. (2000). An empirical classification of social anxiety: Performance, interpersonal and offensive. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 54(1), 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iwata, Y., Suzuki, K., Takei, N., Toulopoulou, T., Tsuchiya, K. J., Matsumoto, K., Takagai, S., Oshiro, M., Nakamura, K., & Mori, N. (2011). Jiko-shisen-kyofu (fear of one’s own glance), but not taijin-kyofusho (fear of interpersonal relations), is an east Asian culture-related specific syndrome. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 45(2), 148–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. James, R. (2006). Culture-bound syndromes: Taijin Kyofusho. In Y. Jackson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of multicultural psychology (pp. 146–147). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Jolivet, M. (2005). Japan: The childless society?: The crisis of motherhood. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kato, T. A., Tateno, M., Shinfuku, N., Fujisawa, D., Teo, A. R., Sartorius, N., Akiyama, T., Ishida, T., Choi, T. Y., Balhara, Y. P. S., & Matsumoto, R. (2012). Does the ‘hikikomori’ syndrome of social withdrawal exist outside Japan? A preliminary international investigation. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 47(7), 1061–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim, J., Rapee, R. M., & Gaston, J. E. (2008). Symptoms of offensive type Taijin-Kyofusho among Australian social phobics. Depression and Anxiety, 25, 601–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kitayama, O. (1991). The wounded caretaker and guilt. International Review of Psychoanalysis, 18, 229–240.Google Scholar
  24. Klass, D. (1996). Ancestor worship in Japan: Dependence and the resolution of grief. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying, 33(4), 279–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee, S., & Oh, K. S. (1999). Offensive type of social phobia: Cross-cultural perspectives. International Medical Journal Tokyo, 6(4), 271–280.Google Scholar
  26. Okano, K. I. (1993). Shame and social phobia: A transcultural viewpoint. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 58(3), 323–338.Google Scholar
  27. Okano, K. (1997). A notion of “dissociogenic stress”. Dissociation, 10, 130–134.Google Scholar
  28. Okano, K. (2017). Passivity, non-expression and the Japanese Oedipus. Presented at IPA Asia-Pacific Conference, Taipei, 4–6 May 2017.Google Scholar
  29. Okonogi, K. (1983). The way to read and grasp others. PHP Institute.Google Scholar
  30. Okonogi, K. (1992). Amae as seen in diverse interpersonal interactions. Infant Mental Health Journal, 13(1), 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Patel, A., Badhoniya, N., Khadse, S., Senarath, U., Agho, K. E., Dibley, M. J., & South Asia Infant Feeding Research Network (SAIFRN)∗. (2010). Infant and young child feeding indicators and determinants of poor feeding practices in India: Secondary data analysis of National Family Health Survey 2005–06. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 31(2), 314–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sharpless, B. A., Balko, A., & Grom, J. L. (2016). Taijin Kyofusho. In Sharpless, B.A.(ed). Unusual and rare psychological disorders: A handbook for clinical practice and research (Vol. 177).Google Scholar
  33. Shwalb, D. W., Nakazawa, J., Yamamoto, T., & Hyun, J.-H. (2004). Fathering in Japanese, Chinese, and Korean Cultures: A Review of the Research Literature. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (pp. 146–181).Google Scholar
  34. Sonuga-Barke, E. J., & Mistry, M. (2000). The effect of extended family living on the mental health of three generations within two Asian communities. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39(2), 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sumida, M., & Fujii, M. (1998). A study on child-rearing anxiety of fathers. Research Bulletin, 1, 79–98. Graduate School of Human Environment Studies, Kyusyu University.Google Scholar
  36. Tatara, M. (1994). Clinical considerations of amorphous personality, Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Hiroshima University. Part 1, Psychology Division, Vol. 43, pp. 175–182.Google Scholar
  37. Tatara, M. (2005). Interpersonal characteristics of Japanese people seen through the linguistic style based on A. Mori’s Niko-kankei (Vol. 7, pp. 59–67). Reports from the Faculty of Human Studies, Kyoto Bunkyo University.Google Scholar
  38. Watanabe, H. (1992). Difficulties in amae: A clinical perspective. Infant Mental Health Journal, 13(1), 26–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Winnicott, D. W. (1945). Primitive emotional development. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 26, 137–143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Winnicott, D. W. (1958). The capacity to be alone. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 39, 416–420.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Winnicott, D. W. (1965). The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development. The International Psycho-Analytical Library (Vol. 64, pp. 1–276). London: The Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psychoanalysis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenichiro Okano
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EducationKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations