Advertisement

The Drafter’s Deontology

  • Virgilio Zapatero Gómez
Chapter
Part of the Legisprudence Library book series (LEGIS, volume 6)

Abstract

The nature of his work makes the drafter subjected to special duties towards his principal (the government or the legislators themselves), to parliament and to society. But the demands that derive from the respect for his profession are not always compatible with the demands of government, legislators, parliament and society. This chapter suggests some criteria for the resolution of conflicts arising from rivalling loyalties to which the drafter may be exposed. Among the duties which should be included in a code of conduct for legal drafters are the duty of professional competence, the duty to assist and advise the legislators who commission a draft norm (not to substitute them), the duty of loyalty to the institutional system and the duty of confidentiality. Legal drafting is a task with obvious political components, and the drafter therefore cannot avoid reflecting on his responsibility as a professional and as a citizen, as a member of society.

Keywords

Deontologic codes Drafter’s duties Assistance and counselling Confidentiality Loyalty Drafter’s conflicting loyalties Responsibility Politics of legislative drafting 

References

  1. American Bar Association (2004) ABA model rules of professional conduct (updated in 2018). ABA, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown DG, Cartin DL (1996) The attorney–client relationship and legislative lawyers: the state legislature as organizational client. J Am Soc Legis Clerks Secretaries 2(1):57–64Google Scholar
  3. Bundesministerium der Justiz (2008) Handbuch der Rechtsförmlichkeit, 3rd edn. Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz, Berlin. Published in the Bundesanzeiger 60, no. 160a, 22 September 2008. http://hdr.bmj.de/
  4. Burton IF, Drewry G (1970) Public legislation: a survey of the session 1966/1969. Parliament Aff 23:154–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burton IF, Drewry G (1981) Legislation and public policy: public bills in the 1970–74 parliament. Macmillan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark K (1999) The ethics of representing elected representatives. Law Contemp Probl 61(2):31–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cramton RC (1991) The lawyer as whistleblower: confidentiality and the government lawyer. Geo J Legal Ethics 5:291–315Google Scholar
  8. Donahoe KW (1989) The model rules and the government lawyer. A sword or shiel? A response to the DC Bar Special Committee on Government Lawyer and the Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Geo J Legal Ethics 2:897–1002Google Scholar
  9. Drewry G (1981) Legislation. In: Walkand SA, Ryle M (eds) The commons today. Fontana, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Drieger EA (1953) The preparation of legislation. Can Bar Rev 31:33–51Google Scholar
  11. Edwards C III, Wood BD (1999) Who influences whom? The president, congress and the media. Am Pol Sci Rev 93:327–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Griffith JA, Ryle M (1989) Parliament. Functions, practice and procedure. Sweet and Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Josephson W, Pearce R (1986) To whom does the government owe the duty of loyalty when clients are in conflict? How Law J 29:539–569Google Scholar
  14. La Spina A (1989) La decisione legislativa. Lineamenti di una teoria. Giuffrè, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  15. Lindblom CE (1991) El proceso de elaboración de políticas públicas. MAP, MadridGoogle Scholar
  16. Luhmann N (1981) Teoria politica nello Stato del Benessere. Franco Agnelli, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  17. Macnair D (2004) Ethics and drafting. Ottawa, Department of JusticeGoogle Scholar
  18. Marcello DA (1996) The ethics and politics of legislative drafting. Tul Law Rev 70:2437–2462Google Scholar
  19. Meny I, Thoenig J-C (1992) Las políticas públicas. Ariel, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  20. Office of Legislative Legal Services (State of Colorado) (2004) Guidelines for working with lobbysts. Revised version (updated in October 2008). Colorado General Assembly, DenverGoogle Scholar
  21. Pennell JN (1994) Representations involving fiduciary entities: who is the client? Fordham Law Rev 62:1320–1356Google Scholar
  22. Purdy R (1987) Professional responsibility for legislative drafters: suggested guidelines and discussion of ethics and role problems. Seton Hall Legis J 11(1):67–120Google Scholar
  23. Subirats J (1992) Un problema de estilo. La formación de las políticas públicas en España. Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, MadridGoogle Scholar
  24. Weinstein JB (1966) Some ethical and political problems of a government attorney. Melbourne Law Rev 18:155–172Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Virgilio Zapatero Gómez
    • 1
  1. 1.Facultad de DerechoUniversidad de Alcalá de HenaresAlcalá de HenaresSpain

Personalised recommendations