Advertisement

A Quantitative Retelling of Cades Cove’s Cemeteries

  • Gary S. FosterEmail author
  • William E. Lovekamp
Chapter
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

The same gravestone data that were transcribed as social variables to describe Cades Cove (in Chapter  6) are quantitatively analyzed to reveal patterns of statistical significance or dependence among the relationships of those variables. Empirical assessment relying on tests of significance and measures of association strengthens the veracity and the reliability of conclusions and social patterns observed among the variables, empowering the generalizations as typifying the community. Reconstructing and profiling community quantitatively enhances credibility and confidence in the findings, and more comprehensively presents community as dynamic, as opposed to static description. Cades Cove did not have a town hall or a mayor’s office, a library or a newspaper to tell its own story, but it has its cemeteries.

Keywords

Bivariate Quantitative analysis Social patterns Social variables Statistical significance 

References

  1. Agresti, Alan, and Barbara Finlay. 2009. Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Bean, Lee L., Geraldine P. Mineau, and Douglas L. Anderson. 1990. Fertility Change on the American Frontier: Adaptation and Innovation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Caudill, Harry M. 1962. Night Comes to the Cumberlands: A Biography of a Depressed Area. Boston: Atlantic-Little, Brown Books. Google Scholar
  4. Clark, A., A. Johnson, and D. Mathews. 2019. “The Gendered Language of Gravestones: A Comparative Study of Central and Northern Appalachian Cemeteries.” In Handbook of a Changing World Language Map, edited by S. Brunn, D. Gilbreath and R. Kehrein, 1–14. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Crowell, Elizabeth A., and Norman Vardney Mackie III. 1990. “The Funerary Monuments and Burial Patterns of Colonial Tidewater Virginia, 1607–1776.” Markers 7: 103–138.Google Scholar
  6. Dethlefsen, Edwin. 1969. “Colonial Gravestones and Demography.” American Journal of Physical Anthropology 31: 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dethlefsen, Edwin, and James Deetz. 1966. “Death’s Heads, Cherubs, and Willow Trees: Experimental Archaeology in Colonial Cemeteries.” American Antiquity 31 (4): 502–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunn, Durwood. 1988. Cades Cove: The Life and Death of a Southern Appalachian Community, 1818–1937. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fetterman, John. 1967. Stinking Creek: The Portrait of a Small Mountain Community in Appalachia. New York: E. P. Dutton and Company.Google Scholar
  10. Foster, Gary S. 1981. “Appalachian Isolation in Perspective.” Appalachian Heritage 8 (1): 34–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foster, Gary S., and Craig M. Eckert. 2003. “Up from the Grave: A Socio-Historical Reconstruction of an African-American Community from Cemetery Data in the Rural Midwest.” Journal of Black Studies 33 (4): 468–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foster, Gary S., and Richard L. Hummel. 1995. “The Adkins-Woodson Cemetery: A Sociological Examination of Cemeteries as Community.” Markers: Journal of the Association of Gravestone Studies 12: 92–117.Google Scholar
  13. Foster, Gary S., and Richard L. Hummel. 1997. “Wham, Bam, Thank You SAM: Critical Dimensions of the Persistence of Hillbilly Caricatures.” Sociological Spectrum 17 (2): 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foster, Gary S., Richard L. Hummel, and Donald J. Adamchak. 1998. “Patterns of Conception, Natality and Mortality from Midwestern Cemeteries: A Sociological Analysis of Historical Data.” Sociological Quarterly 39 (3): 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foster, Gary S., Richard L. Hummel, and Robert Whittenbarger. 1987. “Ethnic Echoes Through 100 Years of Midwestern Agriculture.” Rural Sociology 52, 365–378.Google Scholar
  16. Frome, Michael. 1966. Strangers in High Places: The Story of the Great Smoky Mountains. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday and Company.Google Scholar
  17. Frost, William Goodell. 1899. “Our Contemporary Ancestors in the Southern Mountains.” Atlantic Monthly 83 (March): 311–319.Google Scholar
  18. Giguere, Joy M. 2007. “Virtuous Women, Useful Men, and Lovely Children.” Markers 24: 1–23.Google Scholar
  19. Haveman, Melissa. 1999. “A Sociological Analysis of Children’s Gravestones.” Illness, Crisis, and Loss 7: 266–286.Google Scholar
  20. Kephart, Horace. 1922. Our Southern Highlanders: A Narrative of Adventure in the Southern Appalachians and a Study of the Life Among the Mountaineers. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Kim, Aukkoo. 2000. “Urban Development in the United States, 1690–1990.” Southern Economic Journal 66: 855–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kreusch, Erik, Sarah Lowry, and Benjamin Zank. 2010. “Geophysical and Archaeological Testing in Cades Cove: Cades Cove Primitive Baptist Church, Cades Cove Missionary Baptist Church at Hyatt Hill, Feezell Cemetery, and Browns’ Hill Cemetery in Cades Cove, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Blount County, Tennessee.” Unpublished Report Completed for the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Gatlinburg, TN.Google Scholar
  23. Leebrick, Rhiannon A., and James N. Maples. 2015. “Landscape as Arena and Spatial Narrative in the New River Gorge National River’s Coal Camps: A Case Study of the Elverton, West Virginia 1914 Strike.” Southeastern Geographer 55 (4): 474–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lott, Jacqueline A. 2000. “On the Hallowed Hill: An Analysis of Historic Cemeteries Within the Great Smoky Mountains National Park.” Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.Google Scholar
  25. Lowry, Sarah. 2009. “Report on Ground-Penetrating Radar Surveys: Cades Cove Cemeteries Within Great Smoky Mountains National Park, October 7.” Unpublished Report Submitted to Erik S. Kreusch, Park Archaeologist, Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Gatlinburg, TN.Google Scholar
  26. Matthews, Elmora Messer. 1965. Neighbor and Kin: Life in a Tennessee Ridge Community. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Maynard, Charles W. 2004. Churches of the Smokies. Gatlinburg, TN: Great Smoky Mountains Association.Google Scholar
  28. McGinnis, Robert. 2012. Cemeteries of the Blount County Portion of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. East Tennessee Cemetery Research.Google Scholar
  29. McGinnis, Robert. 2013. Cemeteries of the Tennessee Portion of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. East Tennessee Cemetery Research.Google Scholar
  30. Nolin, Catharina. 2018. “Framing Children’s Sections in Cemeteries.” In Heritage of Death: Landscapes of Emotion, Memory and Practice, edited by Mattais Frihammer and Helaine Silverman. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pierce, Daniel S. 1998. “The Barbarism of the Huns: Family and Community Removal in the Establishment of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park.” Tennessee Historical Quarterly 57 (1): 62–79.Google Scholar
  32. Pierce, Daniel S. 2013. Corn from a Jar: Moonshining in the Great Smoky Mountains. Gatlinburg, TN: Great Smoky Mountains Association.Google Scholar
  33. Raine, James Watt. 1924. The Land of Saddlebags: A Study of the Mountain People of Appalachia. Richmond: Presbyterian Committee of Publication.Google Scholar
  34. Richards, Brandon. 2014. “Hier Leydt Begraven: A Primer on Dutch Colonial Gravestones.” Northeast Historical Archaeology 43 (2): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roberts, Bruce, and Nancy Roberts. 1970. Where Time Stood Still: A Portrait of Appalachia. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
  36. Rule, La Reina, and William K. Hammond. 1973. What’s in a Name: Surnames of America. New York: Jove/HBJ Books.Google Scholar
  37. Sarris, Jonathan Dean. 2006. A Separate Civil War: Communities in Conflict in the Mountain South. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  38. Schwartzweller, Harry K., James S. Brown, and J. J. Mangalam. 1971. Mountain Families in Transition: A Case Study of Appalachian Migration. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Stephenson, John B. 1968. Shiloh: A Mountain Community. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
  40. Stone, Gaynell. 2009. “Sacred Landscapes: Material Evidence of Ideological and Ethnic Choice in Long Island, New York, Gravestones, 1680–1800.” Historical Archaeology 43: 142–159.Google Scholar
  41. Thornborough, Laura. 1937. The Great Smoky Mountains. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell. Reprinted 1962, Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
  42. Vincent, George E. 1898. “A Retarded Frontier.” American Journal of Sociology 4: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Walls, David S., and Dwight B. Billings. 1977. “The Sociology of Southern Appalachia.” Appalachian Journal 5 (Autumn): 131–144.Google Scholar
  44. Weber, Max. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Weller, James E. 1965. Yesterday’s People: Life in Contemporary Appalachia. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  46. Williams, Cratis D. 1961. “The Southern Mountaineer in Fact and Fiction.” Unpublished Dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
  47. Williams, Cratis D., 1972. “Who Are the Southern Mountaineers?” Appalachian Journal 1 (1): 48–55.Google Scholar
  48. Williamson, James W. 1995. Hillbillyland: What the Movies Did to the Mountains and What the Mountains Did to the Movies. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  49. Wrigley, E. A., and R. S. Schofield. 1981. The Population History of England, 1541–1871. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Yates, Frank. 1934. “Contingency Tables Involving Small Numbers and the X2 Test.” Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1: 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Young, Frank W. 1960. “Graveyards and Social Structure.” Rural Sociology 25: 446–450.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sociology, Anthropology, and CriminologyEastern Illinois UniversityCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations