Advertisement

Intelligent Tutoring System for Negotiation Skills Training

  • Emmanuel JohnsonEmail author
  • Gale Lucas
  • Peter Kim
  • Jonathan Gratch
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11626)

Abstract

Intelligent tutoring systems have proven very effective at teaching hard skills such as math and science, but less research has examined how to teach “soft” skills such as negotiation. In this paper, we introduce an effective approach to teaching negotiation tactics. Prior work showed that students can improve through practice with intelligent negotiation agents. We extend this work by proposing general methods of assessment and feedback that could be applied to a variety of such agents. We evaluate these techniques through a human subject study. Our study demonstrates that personalized feedback improves students’ use of several foundational tactics.

Keywords

Negotiation training Individualized feedback Soft skills training 

References

  1. 1.
    Koedinger, K.R.: Cognitive tutors. In: The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pp. 61–78 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A., et al.: Cognitive tutors: technology bringing learning sciences to the classroom, na (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koedinger, K.R., Anderson, J.R., Hadley, W.H., Mark, M.A.: Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. (IJAIED) 8, 30–43 (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mills-Tettey, G.A., et al.: Improving child literacy in Africa: experiments with an automated reading tutor. In: 2009 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD) (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wijekumar, K., Meyer, B., Spielvogel, J.: Web-based intelligent tutoring to improve reading comprehension in elementary and middle schools: design, research, and preliminary findings. In: E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Olney, A., Bakhtiari, D., Greenberg, D., Graesser, A.C.: Assessing computer literacy of adults with low literacy skills. In: EDM (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guo, P.J.: Codeopticon: real-time, one-to-many human tutoring for computer programming. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chollet, M., Sratou, G., Shapiro, A., Morency, L.-P., Scherer, S.: An interactive virtual audience platform for public speaking training. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Graesser, A.C., Fiore, S.M., Greiff, S., Andrews-Todd, J., Foltz, P.W., Hesse, F.W.: Advancing the science of collaborative problem solving. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 19, 59–92 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Monahan, S., Johnson, E., Lucas, G., Finch, J., Gratch, J.: Autonomous agent that provides automated feedback improves negotiation skills. In: Penstein Rosé, C., et al. (eds.) AIED 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10948, pp. 225–229. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gratch, J., DeVault, D., Lucas, G.: The benefits of virtual humans for teaching negotiation. In: Traum, D., Swartout, W., Khooshabeh, P., Kopp, S., Scherer, S., Leuski, A. (eds.) IVA 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10011, pp. 283–294. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47665-0_25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim, J.M., et al.: BiLAT: a game-based environment for practicing negotiation in a cultural context. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 19, 289–308 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aleven, V., Ashley, K., Lynch, C., Pinkwart, N.: Intelligent tutoring systems for ill-defined domains: assessment and feedback in ill-defined domains. In: The 9th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, Promising Practices for Strengthening the Regional STEM Workforce Development Ecosystem. National Academies Press (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Forum, W.E.: The Future of Jobs: Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum, Geneva (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hernandez, M., Avery, D.R.: Getting the short end of the stick: racial bias in salary negotiations. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goldman, E.G.: Lipstick and labcoats: undergraduate women’s gender negotiation in STEM fields. NASPA J. Women High. Educ. 5, 115–140 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lin, R., Oshrat, Y., Kraus, S.: Investigating the benefits of automated negotiations in enhancing people’s negotiation skills. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 1 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kolb, A.Y., Kolb, D.A.: Experiential learning theory. In: Seel, N.M. (ed.) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, pp. 1215–1219. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_227
  20. 20.
    Mell, J., Gratch, J.: IAGO: interactive arbitration guide online. In: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Johnson, E., DeVault, D., Gratch, J.: Towards an autonomous agent that provides automated feedback on students’ negotiation skills. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mell, J., Gratch, J.: Grumpy and Pinocchio: answering human-agent negotiation questions through realistic agent design. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mell, J., Gratch, J., Baarslag, T., Aydoğran, R., Jonker, C.M.: Results of the first annual human-agent league of the automated negotiating agents competition. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, New York, NY, USA (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emmanuel Johnson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gale Lucas
    • 1
  • Peter Kim
    • 1
  • Jonathan Gratch
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations