Advertisement

Control of Price Related Terms in Standard Form Contracts in the Netherlands: Exclusion of Clauses Pertaining to the Core of the Contract

  • Ewoud HondiusEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law book series (GSCL, volume 36)

Abstract

In the 1970s, most European countries adopted legislation on unfair contract terms. Clauses pertaining to the core of the contract were usually exempted from this control. The fear of a return to the ancient iustum pretium doctrine was behind this. Not every country has adopted this exception. The Nordic states, for example, have declined to do so. This paper will briefly study the Nordic system to highlight that excluding the price clauses is not a necessity. It will then focus on giving a closer look at the Dutch system of control. The freedom of contracts principle, as well as the Dutch control of both unfair contract terms and price terms will be presented. The most important Dutch cases will also be studied.

References

  1. Appenzeller C (2017) Die europäische AGB-Kontrolle. Nomos, Baden-Baden, p 347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asser/Hartkamp & Sieburgh 6-III, 2014/458-513Google Scholar
  3. Atamer YM (2017) Why judicial control of price terms in consumer contracts might not always be the right answer. Insights from behavioural law and economics. Modern Law Rev 80(4):624–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cherednychenko O (2007) Fundamental rights, contract law and the protection of the weaker party. A comparative analysis of the constitutionalisation of contract law, with emphasis on risky Financial transactions. Sellier, European Law Publishers, Utrecht, p 575Google Scholar
  5. De Laat S (2016) Naar zwarte, grijze en blauwe lijsten in het arbeidsrecht. Wolters Kluwer, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  6. Fervers M, Gsell B (2019) Control of price related terms in standard form contract in Germany. In Atamer YM, Pichonnaz P (eds) Control of price related terms in standard form contracts. Springer, Cham, pp X-XXGoogle Scholar
  7. Hage CA (2017) Handhaving van privaatrecht door toezichthouders. Wolters Kluwer, Leiden, p 511Google Scholar
  8. Hartkamp AS (2016) Chapter 10. Law of obligations. In: Chorus J, Hondius E, Voermans W (eds) Introduction to Dutch law, 5th edn. Wolters Kluwer, Deventer, pp 171–199Google Scholar
  9. Hijma J (2016) Algemene voorwaarden, 4th edn. Wolters Kluwer, DeventerGoogle Scholar
  10. Hondius E (1978a) Standaardvoorwaarden, PhD. Wolters Kluwer, Deventer, p 956Google Scholar
  11. Hondius E (1978b) Unfair terms in consumer contracts. Molengraaff Instituut voor Privaatrecht, Utrecht, p 283Google Scholar
  12. Hondius E (1998) Freedom of contract and constitutional law in the Netherlands. In: Mordechai Rabello A, Sarcevic P (eds) Freedom of contract and constitutional law. Hebrew University, Jerusalem, pp 201–227Google Scholar
  13. Hondius E (2017) Contract of rechtshandeling: weeffout in het BW? In: Van de Pol F et al (eds) Vijftig weeffouten in het BW. Ars Aequi, Nijmege, pp 77–81Google Scholar
  14. Lau Hansen J (2005) Anvendensen af Aftalelovens §36 på vedtaegter/U 1998.281 H (BYG). In: Flodgren B et al (eds) Avtalslagen 90 år/Aktuell nordisk rättspraxis. Norstedt Juridik AB, Stockholm, pp 267–279Google Scholar
  15. Loos M (2018) Algemene voorwaarden, 3rd edn. Boom, The Hague, p 493Google Scholar
  16. Pavillon CMDS (2011) Open normen in het Europees consumentenrecht: de oneerlijkheidsnorm in vergelijkend perspectief. Kluwer, GroningenGoogle Scholar
  17. Van Loo IH (2013) Vernietiging van overeenkomsten op grond van laesio enormis. Dwaling of misbruik van omstandigheden. Brave New Books, Rotterdam, p 341Google Scholar
  18. Van Wechem THM (2007) Toepasselijkheid van algemene voorwaarden. Wolters Kluwer, DeventerGoogle Scholar
  19. Vriesendorp-van Seumeren RM (2002) Algemene voorwaarden en verzekeringsrecht. Wolters Kluwer, Deventer, pp 177–208Google Scholar
  20. Warendorf H, Thomas R, Curry-Sumner I (eds) (2013) The Civil Code of the Netherlands. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, p 1301Google Scholar
  21. Wessels B, Pavillon CMDS (2017) Collectieve toetsing. In: Wessels B, Jongeneel RHC (eds) Algemene voorwaarden. Wolters Kluwer, Deventer, pp 469–485Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Utrecht University, Faculty of LawUtrechtNetherlands

Personalised recommendations