Advertisement

The Concept of Scrutiny

  • William Aspray
  • James W. Cortada
Chapter
Part of the History of Computing book series (HC)

Abstract

This introductory chapter considers the concept of scrutiny, which is a concept that underlies the analysis throughout the book. Scrutiny is an essential element of the methodological practices of science and philosophy. It is also essential to being a consumer in a world in which one is assaulted by advertising every place one turns, or in determining the authenticity of a cultural artifact such as a novel or play. The politics of honest election and fair governance are also a place where scrutiny is important. Scrutiny is what ties together the topics covered in this book (debunking of urban legends, political fact-checking, truth-or-fiction television programming, grade B horror movies, and sites that protect one from computer viruses) that have been prevalent in the years 1990 to 2015. This chapter looks in particular at scrutiny in online settings.

References

  1. Baumeister, R.F., et al., eds. 2007. Encyclopedia of Social Psychology, 109–110. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
  2. Beveridge, W.I.B. 1950. The Art of Scientific Investigation, 106. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  3. Corn, David. 2003. The Lies of George W. Bush: Mastering the Politics of Deception. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  4. Cortada, James, and William Aspray. 2019. Fake Facts Nation: The Long History of Lies and Misrepresentations in America. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  5. Kompf, Michael. 2004. The Legacy of Neil Postman. College Quarterly 7 (1): 20.Google Scholar
  6. Lord, C.G., L. Ross, and M.R. Lepper. 1979. Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (11): 2098–2109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nyhan, Brendan, and Jason Reifler. 2010. When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions. Political Behavior 32: 303–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Postman, Neil, and Charles Weingartner. 1969. Teaching as a Subversive Activity, 2. New York: Dell.Google Scholar
  9. Silverman, Craig. 2007. Regret the Error: How Media Mistakes Pollute the Press and Imperil Free Speech, 6. New York: Union Square Press.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2011. The Backfire Effect: More on the Press’s Inability to Debunk Bad Information. Columbia Journalism Review, June 17. https://archives.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_backfire_effect.php.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Aspray
    • 1
  • James W. Cortada
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Information ScienceUniversity of Colorado BoulderBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Charles Babbage InstituteUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations