Advertisement

Testing the Format? Does Group-Centered Prevention Work? A Very Successful Year. The 2015–2016 Group Report

  • Shana Ingram
Chapter

Abstract

Our original goal when we started in 2009 was to develop a program that would help children who were failing in school learn to read at their age level. Most of the children who we work with have been retained multiple years by the time they arrive at the Reading Orienteering Club. We were seeing the fulfillment of our dream. We were seeing children move up to their age level in reading in just 1 year.

Keywords

Group-centered prevention Intrinsic motivation Individual learning differences Academic failure Reading failure Teaching method Small groups Group prevention Vowel clustering Teaching vowel sounds At-risk students 

Notes

Acknowledgements

  1. 1.

    Special appreciation to Keri Weed, Ph.D. and Meredith Elzy, Ph.D., University of South Carolina Aiken, for allowing their students to work on the project.

     
  2. 2.

    A special thank you to St. John’s United Methodist Church in Aiken for providing community volunteers, financial sponsorship, and allowing us to use classroom space for this project.

     
  3. 3.

    Portions of this research were presented at the 125th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association at Denver, Colorado. August 7, 2016.

     
  4. 4.

    Elaine Clanton Harpine, Ph.D., was the director of the Camp Sharigan Project for 8 years. She developed the Camp Sharigan and Reading Orienteering Club programs and created the program packets for both programs.

     
  5. 5.

    Shana Ingram has a B. A. in Psychology and English from the University of South Carolina Aiken and an M.A. in Clinical Psychology from Western Carolina University. She has been participating in adolescent research at West Virginia University since completing her master’s degree and plans to continue conducting research and providing clinical services with rural populations.

     

References

  1. Clanton Harpine, E. (2013). Erasing failure in the classroom, vol. 3: The Reading Orienteering Club, using vowel clustering in an after-school program. North Augusta, SC: Group-Centered Learning.Google Scholar
  2. Clanton Harpine, E. (2015). Group-centered prevention in mental health: Theory, training, and practice. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kazdin, A. E. (2008). Evidence-based treatment and practice: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist, 63, 146–159.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kazdin, A. E. (2010). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Macgowan, M. J., & Wong, S. E. (2014). Single-case designs in group work: Past applications, future directions. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 18, 138-158.Google Scholar
  6. Morris, D. (2005). The howard street tutoring manual: Teaching at-risk readers in the primary grades (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Morris, D., Tyner, B., & Perney, J. (2000). Early steps: Replicating the effects of a first-grade reading intervention program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 681.Google Scholar
  8. Perney, J., Morris, D., & Carter, S. (1997). Factorial and predictive validity of first grader’s scores on the early screening instrument. Psychological Reports, 81(1), 207–210.Google Scholar
  9. Rappaport, J., & Seidman, E. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of community psychology. New York: Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Royse, D., Thyer, B., & Padgett, D. (2016). Program evaluation: An introduction to an evidence-based approach (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Centage Learning.Google Scholar
  11. Shipman, S., & Wholey, J. (2011). Performance measurement and evaluation: Definitions and relationships (GAO-11-646SP). Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office.Google Scholar
  12. Smith, J. D. (2012). Single-case experimental designs: A systematic review of published research and current standards. Psychological Methods, 17, 510–550.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Tracey, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Norman, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., et al. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 171–181.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9174-zCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shana Ingram
    • 1
  1. 1.University of South Carolina AikenAikenUSA

Personalised recommendations