Advertisement

A Knowledge Based Self-Adaptive Differential Evolution Algorithm for Protein Structure Prediction

  • Pedro H. Narloch
  • Márcio DornEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11538)

Abstract

Tertiary protein structure prediction is one of the most challenging problems in Structural Bioinformatics, and it is a NP-Complete problem in computational complexity theory. The complexity is related to the significant number of possible conformations a single protein can assume. Metaheuristics became useful algorithms to find feasible solutions in viable computational time since exact algorithms are not capable. However, these stochastic methods are highly-dependent from parameter tuning for finding the balance between exploitation (local search refinement) and exploration (global exploratory search) capabilities. Thus, self-adaptive techniques were created to handle the parameter definition task, since it is time-consuming. In this paper, we enhance the Self-Adaptive Differential Evolution with problem-domain knowledge provided by the angle probability list approach, comparing it with every single mutation we used to compose our set of mutation operators. Moreover, a population diversity metric is used to analyze the behavior of each one of them. The proposed method was tested with ten protein sequences with different folding patterns. Results obtained showed that the self-adaptive mechanism has a better balance between the search capabilities, providing better results in regarding root mean square deviation and potential energy than the non-adaptive single-mutation methods.

Keywords

Protein structure prediction Self-Adaptive Differential Evolution Structural Bioinformatics Knowledge-based methods 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from FAPERGS [16/2551-0000520-6], MCT/CNPq [311022/2015-4; 311611/2018-4], CAPES-STIC AMSUD [88887.135130/2017-01] - Brazil, Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung (AvH) [BRA 1190826 HFST CAPES-P] - Germany. This study was financed in part by the Coordenacão de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brazil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001.

References

  1. 1.
    Anfinsen, C.B.: Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 181(4096), 223–230 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berman, H.M., et al.: The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235–242 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boas, F.E., Harbury, P.B.: Potential energy functions for protein design. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17(2), 199–204 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bonneau, R., Baker, D.: Ab initio protein structure prediction: progress and prospects. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30(1), 173–189 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borguesan, B., e Silva, M.B., Grisci, B., Inostroza-Ponta, M., Dorn, M.: APL: an angle probability list to improve knowledge-based metaheuristics for the three-dimensional protein structure prediction. Comput. Biol. Chem. 59, 142–157 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borguesan, B., Inostroza-Ponta, M., Dorn, M.: NIAS-server: neighbors influence of amino acids and secondary structures in proteins. J. Comput. Biol. 24(3), 255–265 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borguesan, B., Narloch, P.H., Inostroza-Ponta, M., Dorn, M.: A genetic algorithm based on restricted tournament selection for the 3D-PSP problem. In: 2018 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 1–8. IEEE, July 2018Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chaudhury, S., Lyskov, S., Gray, J.J.: PyRosetta: a script-based interface for implementing molecular modeling algorithms using Rosetta. Bioinformatics 26(5), 689–691 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Lima Corrêa, L., Borguesan, B., Krause, M.J., Dorn, M.: Three-dimensional protein structure prediction based on memetic algorithms. Comput. Oper. Res. 91, 160–177 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Corriveau, G., Guilbault, R., Tahan, A., Sabourin, R.: Review of phenotypic diversity formulations for diagnostic tool. Appl. Soft Comput. J. 13(1), 9–26 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Das, S., Mullick, S.S., Suganthan, P.N.: Recent advances in differential evolution - an updated survey. Swarm Evol. Comput. 27, 1–30 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dorn, M., e Silva, M.B., Buriol, L.S., Lamb, L.C.: Three-dimensional protein structure prediction: methods and computational strategies. Comput. Biol. Chem. 53(PB), 251–276 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Du, K.L.: Search and Optimization by Metaheuristics Techniques and Algorithms Inspired by Nature (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eiben, E., Hinterding, R., Michalewicz, Z.: Parameter control in evolutionary algorithms - evolutionary computation. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 3(2), 124–141 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guyeux, C., Côté, N.M.L., Bahi, J.M., Bienie, W.: Is protein folding problem really a NP-complete one? First investigations. J. Bioinformat. Comput. Biol. 12(01), 1350017(1)–1350017(24) (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kabsch, W., Sander, C.: Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22(12), 2577–2637 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ligabue-Braun, R., Borguesan, B., Verli, H., Krause, M.J., Dorn, M.: Everyone is a protagonist: residue conformational preferences in high-resolution protein structures. J. Comput. Biol. 25(4), 451–465 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Narloch, P.H., Parpinelli, R.S.: Diversification strategies in differential evolution algorithm to solve the protein structure prediction problem. In: Madureira, A.M., Abraham, A., Gamboa, D., Novais, P. (eds.) ISDA 2016. AISC, vol. 557, pp. 125–134. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53480-0_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Narloch, P., Parpinelli, R.: The protein structure prediction problem approached by a cascade differential evolution algorithm using ROSETTA. In: Proceedings - 2017 Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems, BRACIS 2017 (2018)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oliveira, M., Borguesan, B., Dorn, M.: SADE-SPL: a self-adapting differential evolution algorithm with a loop structure pattern library for the PSP problem. In: 2017 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 1095–1102 (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Parpinelli, R.S., Plichoski, G.F., Samuel, R., Narloch, P.H.: A review of techniques for on-line control of parameters in swarm intelligence and evolutionary computation algorithms. Int. J. Bio-inspired Comput. 13, 1–20 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Qin, A., Suganthan, P.: Self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm for numerical optimization. In: 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 2, 1785–1791 (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rohl, C.A., Strauss, C.E., Misura, K.M., Baker, D.: Protein Structure Prediction Using Rosetta, pp. 66–93 (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Storn, R., Price, K.: Differential evolution - a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J. Glob. Optim. 11(4), 341–359 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Venske, S.M., Gonçalves, R.A., Benelli, E.M., Delgado, M.R.: ADEMO/D: an adaptive differential evolution for protein structure prediction problem. Expert Syst. Appl. 56, 209–226 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Walsh, G.: Proteins: Biochemistry and Biotechnology. Wiley, Hoboken (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of InformaticsFederal University of Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations